580
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Some new Hermite–Hadamard type inequalities for differentiable co-ordinated convex functions

, & | (Reviewing Editor)
Article: 1092195 | Received 24 Feb 2015, Accepted 06 Sep 2015, Published online: 01 Oct 2015

Abstract

In the paper, the authors establish some new Hermite–Hadamard type inequalities for differentiable co-ordinated convex functions of two variables.

Public Interest Statement

In the paper, the authors establish some new Hermite–Hadamard type inequalities for differentiable co-ordinated convex functions of two variables.

1. Introduction

The following definitions are well known in the literature.

Definition 1.1.

A function f:IR=(-,+)R, iff(λx+(1-λ)y)λf(x)+(1-λ)f(y)

is valid for all x,yI and λ[0,1], then we say that f is a convex function on I.

Many important inequalities have been established for the class of convex functions, but the most famous is the Hermite–Hadamard inequality (see for instance Pečarić, Proschan, & Tong, Citation1991). This double inequality is stated asfa+b21b-aabf(x)dxf(a)+f(b)2,

where f:IRR a convex function, ab ∊ I with a < b.

A modification for convex functions on Δ, which are also known as co-ordinated convex functions, was introduced by Dragomir (Citation2001) and Dragomir and Pearce (Citation2000) as follows.

Definition 1.2.

A function f:ΔR is said to be convex on the co-ordinates on Δ = [ab] × [cd] R2 with a < b and c < d if the partial mappingsfy:[a,b]R,fy(u)=fy(u,y)andfx:[c,d]R,fx(v)=fx(x,v)

are convex where defined for all (xy) ∊ Δ.

A formal definition for co-ordinated convex functions may be stated as follows.

Definition 1.3.

A function f:ΔR is said to be convex on the co-ordinates on Δ = [ab] × [cd] R2 with a < b and c < d iff(tx+(1-t)z,λy+(1-λ)w)tλf(x,y)+t(1-λ)f(x,w)+(1-t)λf(z,y)+(1-t)(1-λ)f(z,w)

for all t,λ[0,1],(x,y),(z,w)Δ.

The following Hermite–Hadamard type inequality for co-ordinated convex functions on the rectangle form the plane R2 was also proved in Dragomir (Citation2001).

Theorem 1.1.

(Dragomir, Citation2001) Let f:Δ=[a,b]×[c,d]R2R be convex on the co-ordinates on Δ. Thenfa+b2,c+d2121b-aabfx,c+d2dx+1d-ccdfa+b2,ydy1(b-a)(d-c)abcdf(x,y)dydx141b-aabf(x,c)dx+abf(x,d)dx+1d-ccdf(a,y)dy+cdf(b,y)dy14f(a,c)+f(b,c)+f(a,d)+f(b,d).

Theorem 1.2.

(Ozdemir, Akdemir, Kavurmaci, & Avci, Citation2011) Let f:Δ=[a,b]×[c,d]R2R be a partial differentiable function on Δ. If 2fxy is convex on the co-ordinates on Δ, then19fa,c+d2+fb,c+d2+4fa+b2,c+d2+fa+b2,c+fa+b2,d+136f(a,c)+f(a,d)+f(b,c)+f(b,d)+1(b-a)(d-c)abcdf(x,y)dxdy-A5722(b-a)(d-c)2tλf(a,c)+2tλf(a,d)+2tλf(b,c)+2tλf(b,d),

whereA=1b-aabf(x,c)+4fx,c+d2+f(x,d)6dx+1d-ccdf(a,y)+4fa+b2,y+f(b,y)6dy.

Theorem 1.3.

(Latif & Dragomir, Citation2012) Let f:Δ=[a,b]×[c,d]R2R be a partial differentiable function on Δ. If 2fxy is convex on the co-ordinates on Δ, then1(b-a)(d-c)abcdf(x,y)dxdy+fa+b2,c+d2-A(b-a)(d-c)642xyf(a,c)+2xyf(a,d)+2xyf(b,c)+2xyf(b,d),

whereA=1b-aabfx,c+d2dx+1d-ccdfa+b2,ydy.

2. Main results

The following lemma is necessary and plays an important role in establishing our main results:

Lemma 2.1.

Let f:ΩR2R be a twice partial differentiable mapping on Ω° (the interior of Ω) and let Δ: = [ab] × [cd] ⊆ Ω° with a < b and c < d. If 2fxyL1(Δ), where L1(Δ) denotes the set of all Lebesgue integrable functions on Δ, thenI(f):=16(d-c)(b-a)fa+b2,c+d2-1d-ccdfa+b2,ydy-1b-aabfx,c+d2dx+1(d-c)(b-a)cdabf(x,y)dxdy=0101tλ2xyft2a+1-t2b,λ2c+1-λ2ddtdλ+0101tλ2xyf1-t2a+t2b,1-λ2c+λ2ddtdλ-0101tλ2xyft2a+1-t2b,1-λ2c+λ2ddtdλ-0101tλ2xyf1-t2a+t2b,λ2c+1-λ2ddtdλ.

Proof

By integration by parts, we have0101tλ2xyft2a+1-t2b,λ2c+1-λ2ddtdλ=4(b-a)(d-c)fa+b2,c+d2-01fa+b2,λ2c+1-λ2ddλ-01ft2a+1-t2b,c+d2dt+0101ft2a+1-t2b,λ2c+1-λ2ddtdλ=4(b-a)(d-c)fa+b2,c+d2-2d-cc+d2dfa+b2,ydy-2b-aa+b2bfx,c+d2dx+4(b-a)(d-c)c+d2da+b2bf(x,y)dxdy.

Similarly, we have0101tλ2xyf1-t2a+t2b,1-λ2c+λ2ddtdλ=4(b-a)(d-c)fa+b2,c+d2-2d-ccc+d2fa+b2,ydy-2b-aaa+b2fx,c+d2dx+4(b-a)(d-c)cc+d2aa+b2f(x,y)dxdy,0101tλ2xyft2a+1-t2b,1-λ2c+λ2ddtdλ=-4(b-a)(d-c)fa+b2,c+d2-2d-ccc+d2fa+b2,ydy-2b-aa+b2bfx,c+d2dx+4(b-a)(d-c)cc+d2a+b2bf(x,y)dxdy,

and0101tλ2xyf1-t2a+t2b,λ2c+1-λ2ddtdλ=-4(b-a)(d-c)fa+b2,c+d2-2d-cc+d2dfa+b2,ydy-2b-aaa+b2fx,c+d2dx+4(b-a)(d-c)c+d2daa+b2f(x,y)dxdy.

The proof of Lemma 2.1 is complete.

Theorem 2.1.

Let f:ΩR2R be a twice partial differentiable mapping on Ω° (the interior of Ω) and let Δ: = [ab] × [cd] ⊆ Ω° with a < b, c < d and 2fxyL1(Δ), where L1(Δ) denotes the set of all Lebesgue integrable functions on Δ. If 2fxyq is convex on the co-ordinates on Δ and q ≥ 1, then the following inequality holds:I(f)14191/qgq(1,2,2,4)+gq(4,2,2,1)+gq(2,1,4,2)+gq(2,4,1,2),

where fxy(x,y)=2fx,yxy andgq(r1,r2,r3,r4)=r1fxy(a,c)q+r2fxy(a,d)q+r3fxy(b,c)q+r4fxy(b,d)q1/q.

Proof.

Using Lemma 2.1, since 2fxyq is convex on the co-ordinates on Δ and Hölder inequality, thenI(f)0101tλ2fxyt2a+1-t2b,λ2c+1-λ2ddtdλ+0101tλ2fxy1-t2a+t2b,1-λ2c+λ2ddtdλ+0101tλ2fxyt2a+1-t2b,1-λ2c+λ2ddtdλ+0101tλ2fxy1-t2a+t2b,λ2c+1-λ2ddtdλ0101tλdtdλ1-1/q0101tλtλ4fxy(a,c)q+t21-λ2fxy(a,d)q+1-t2λ2fxy(b,c)q+1-2t1-2λfxy(b,d)qdtdλ1/q+0101tλ1-t21-λ2fxy(a,c)q+1-t2λ2fxy(a,d)q+t21-λ2fxy(b,c)q+tλ4fxy(b,d)qdtdλ1/q+0101tλt21-λ2fxy(a,c)q+tλ4fxy(a,d)q+1-t21-λ2fxy(b,c)q+1-t2λ2fxy(b,d)qdtdλ1/q+0101tλ1-t2λ2fxy(a,c)q+1-t21-λ2fxy(a,d)q+tλ4fxy(b,c)q+t21-λ2fxy(b,d)qdtdλ1/q14191/qgq(1,2,2,4)+gq(4,2,2,1)+gq(2,1,4,2)+gq(2,4,1,2)

Theorem 2.1 is proved.

If taking q = 1 in Theorem 2.1, we can derive the following corollary.

Corollary 2.1.1.

Under the conditions of Theorem 2.1, when q = 1, we haveI(f)14fxy(a,c)+fxy(a,d)+fxy(b,c)+fxy(b,d).

Theorem 2.2.

Let f:ΩR2R be a twice partial differentiable mapping on Ω° (the interior of Ω) and let Δ: = [ab] × [cd] ⊆ Ω° with a < b, c < d and 2fxyL1(Δ), where L1(Δ) denotes the set of all Lebesgue integrable functions on Δ. If 2fxyq is convex on the co-ordinates on Δ and q > 1, then the following inequality holds:I(f)1164(q-1)2q-12(1-1/q)gq(1,3,3,9)+gq(9,3,3,1)+gq(3,1,9,3)+gq(3,9,1,3),

where g(r1, r2, r3, r4) is defined in Theorem 2.1.

Proof.

Using Lemma 2.1, and 2fxyq is convex on the co-ordinates on Δ and Hölder’s inequality, we haveI(f)0101(tλ)q/(q-1)dtdλ1-1/q0101tλ4fxy(a,c)q+t21-λ2fxy(a,d)q+1-t2λ2fxy(b,c)q+1-t21-λ2fxy(b,d)qdtdλ1/q+01011-t21-λ2fxy(a,c)q+1-t2λ2fxy(a,d)q+t21-λ2fxy(b,c)q+tλ4fxy(b,d)qdtdλ1/q+0101t21-λ2fxy(a,c)q+tλ4fxy(a,d)q+1-t21-λ2fxy(b,c)q+1-t2λ2fxy(b,d)qdtdλ1/q+01011-t2λ2fxy(a,c)q+1-t21-λ2fxy(a,d)q+tλ4fxy(b,c)q+t21-λ2fxy(b,d)qdtdλ1/q=1164(q-1)2q-12(1-1/q)gq(1,3,3,9)+gq(9,3,3,1)+gq(3,1,9,3)+gq(3,9,1,3).

Theorem 2.2 is proved.

Theorem 2.3.

Let f:ΩR2R be a twice partial differentiable mapping on Ω° (the interior of Ω) and let Δ: = [ab] × [cd] ⊆ Ω° with a < b, c < d and 2fxyL1(Δ), where L1(Δ) denotes the set of all Lebesgue integrable functions on Δ. If 2fxyq is convex on the co-ordinates on Δ and q > 1, then the following inequality holds:I(f)q-12(2q-1)2q-112(q-1)1/qgq(1,3,2,6)+gq(6,2,3,1)+gq(3,1,6,2)+gq(2,6,1,3),

where g(r1, r2, r3, r4) is defined in Theorem 2.1.

Proof.

By Lemma 2.1, since 2fxyq is convex on the co-ordinates on Δ and Hölder’s inequality, we getI(f)0101tλq/(q-1)dtdλ1-1/q0101ttλ4fxy(a,c)q+t21-λ2fxy(a,d)q+1-t2λ2fxy(b,c)q+1-t21-λ2fxy(b,d)qdtdλ1/q+0101t1-t21-λ2fxy(a,c)q+1-t2λ2fxy(a,d)q+t21-λ2fxy(b,c)q+tλ4fxy(b,d)qdtdλ1/q+0101tt21-λ2fxy(a,c)q+tλ4fxy(a,d)q+1-t21-λ2fxy(b,c)q+1-t2λ2fxy(b,d)qdtdλ1/q+0101t1-t2λ2fxy(a,c)q+1-t21-λ2fxy(a,d)q+tλ4fxy(b,c)q+t21-λ2fxy(b,d)qdtdλ1/q=q-12(2q-1)2q-112(q-1)1/qgq(1,3,2,6)+gq(6,2,3,1)+gq(3,1,6,2)+gq(2,6,1,3).

Theorem 2.3 is proved.

Theorem 2.4.

Let f:ΩR2R be a twice partial differentiable mapping on Ω° (the interior of Ω) and let Δ: = [ab] × [cd] ⊆ Ω° with a < b, c < d and 2fxyL1(Δ), where L1(Δ) denotes the set of all Lebesgue integrable functions on Δ. If 2fxyq is convex on the co-ordinates on Δ and q ≥ 1 and q ≥ rs > 0 then the following inequality holds:I(f)14(r+2)(s+2)1/q(q-1)2(2q-r-1)(2q-s-1)1-1/q×gq1,s+3s+1,r+3r+1,(r+3)(s+3)(r+1)(s+1)+gq(r+3)(s+3)(r+1)(s+1),r+3r+1,s+3s+1,1+gqs+3s+1,1,(r+3)(s+3)(r+1)(s+1),r+3r+1+gqr+3r+1,(r+3)(s+3)(r+1)(s+1),1,s+3s+1.

where g(r1r2r3r4) is defined in Theorem 2.1.

Proof.

Using Lemma 2.1, and 2fxyq is convex on the co-ordinates on Δ and Hölder inequality, we haveI(f)0101t(q-r)/(q-1)λ(q-s)/(q-1)dtdλ1-1/q×0101trλstλ4fxy(a,c)q+t21-λ2fxy(a,d)q+1-t2λ2fxy(b,c)q+1-t21-λ2fxy(b,d)qdtdλ1/q+0101trλs1-t21-λ2fxy(a,c)q+1-t2λ2fxy(a,d)q+t21-λ2fxy(b,c)q+tλ4fxy(b,d)qdtdλ1/q+0101trλst21-λ2fxy(a,c)q+tλ4fxy(a,d)q+1-t21-λ2fxy(b,c)q+1-t2λ2fxy(b,d)qdtdλ1/q+0101trλs1-t2λ2fxy(a,c)q+1-t21-λ2fxy(a,d)q+tλ4fxy(b,c)q+t21-λ2fxy(b,d)qdtdλ1/q14(r+2)(s+2)1/q(q-1)2(2q-r-1)(2q-s-1)1-1/q×gq1,s+3s+1,r+3r+1,(r+3)(s+3)(r+1)(s+1)+gq(r+3)(s+3)(r+1)(s+1),r+3r+1,s+3s+1,1+gqs+3s+1,1,(r+3)(s+3)(r+1)(s+1),r+3r+1+gqr+3r+1,(r+3)(s+3)(r+1)(s+1),1,s+3s+1.

Theorem 2.4 is proved.

If taking r = s = q in Theorem 2.4, we can derive the following corollary.

Corollary 2.4.1.

Under the conditions of Theorem2.4, when r = s = q, we haveI(f)14(q+2)(q+2)1/qgq1,q+3q+1,q+3q+1,(q+3)2(q+1)2+gq(q+3)2(q+1)2,q+3q+1,q+3q+1,1+gqq+3q+1,1,(q+3)2(q+1)2,q+3q+1+gqq+3q+1,(q+3)2(q+1)2,1,q+3q+1.

where g(r1r2r3r4) is defined in Theorem 2.1.

Acknowledgements

The authors appreciate the anonymous referees for their careful corrections to and valuable comments on the original version of this paper.

Additional information

Funding

This work was partially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation (NNSF) [grant number 11361038] of China; the Foundation of the Research Program of Science and Technology at Universities of Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region [grant number NJZY14192]; NSF of Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region [grant number 2014BS0106], [grant number 2015BS0123]; the Scientific Innovation Project for Graduates at the Inner Mongolia University for Nationalities [grant number NMDSS1419] China.

Notes on contributors

Xu-Yang Guo

Xu-Yang Guo is being a graduate for master degree of science in applied mathematics at Inner Mongolia University for Nationalities. Her supervisor is the third author, Professor Bo-Yan Xi. Currently, her research interests are in the areas of mathematical inequalities and convex analysis.

References

  • Dragomir, S. S. (2001). On Hadamard inequality for convex functions on the co-ordinates in a rectangle from the plane. Taiwanese Journal of Mathematics, 5, 775–788.
  • Dragomir, S. S., & Pearce, C. E. M. (2000). Selected topics on Hermite–Hadamard inequalities and applications (RGMIA Monographs). Victoria University. Retrieved from http://rgmia.org/monographs/hermite_hadamard.html
  • Latif, M. A., & Dragomir, S. S. (2012). On some new inequalities for differentiable co-ordinated convex functions. Journal of Inequalities and Applications, 2012, 28. doi:10.1186/1029-242X-2012-28
  • Ozdemir, M. E., Akdemir, A. O., Kavurmaci, H., & Avci, M. (2011). On the Simpson’s inequality for co-ordinated convex functions. arXiv:1101.0075.
  • Pečarić, J. E., Proschan, F., & Tong, Y. L. (1991). Convex functions, partial ordering and statistical applications. New York, NY: Academic Press.