Yield and agronomic performance of released Tef [Eragrostis tef (Zucc.) Trotter] varieties under irrigation at Dembia, Northweastrn, Ethiopia

Abstract

Tef is the major staple cereal crop in Ethiopia, mainly grown under rainfed condition but not very common under irrigation. Field experiment was conducted to select well adapted and high yielder tef varieties on vertisoil (blacks soil), at Dembia North weastrn Amhara, Ethiopia during 2017/2018 and 2018/2019 irrigation season. The experiment was arranged in a randomized complete block design with three replications having 36 tef varieties including local check with recommended water dept and intervals for each treatments. A seed rate of 15 kg ha⁻¹ was drilled in a row. The combined analysis over years showed that significant difference (p < 0.01) was observed among the varieties for most of the measured traits including grain yield over the farmer local vareities. Moreover, the combined analysis of variance over years indicated that three varieties, namely Dukem, Gibe and Gola, gave the highest grain yield (3079.7, 2993.2 and 2868.8 kg ha⁻¹, respectively), with yield advantage of 36%, 34.2% and 31.3% over the local check yield (1969.7 kg ha⁻¹), respectively. Therefore, we concluded that based on grain yield and other important traits, Dukem, Gibe and Gola varieties can be recommended for Dembia district and similar areas where irrigation is available.

Keywords:

• Dembia
• grain yield
• irrigation
• tef varieties

PUBLIC INTEREST STATEMENT

In recent years, tef is receiving global attention among cash crops and has been attracting an export market due to attention for its nutritional and health-related benefits due to the absence of gluten, a cause for celiac disease. Drought is one of the main challenges world agriculture is facing, but its effects may vary from region to region. Ethiopia is one of the sub-Saharan African countries facing recurrent droughts leading to low crop productivity or crop failure and food insufficiency. In addition, yield reduction of up to 77% has been reported to have occurred as a result of drought at the anthesis stage of tef. Therefore, produce tef both rainfed and irrigation season to alleviate food insecurity for Ethiopian Farmers in the study area.

Competing Interests

The authors declares no competing interests.

1. Introduction

Tef [Eragrostis tef (Zucc.) Trotter] is an indigenous staple cereal crop of Ethiopia, occupying about 2.6 million hectares (23% of the grain crop area) of land, which is more than any other major cereals such as maize (16%), sorghum (14%) and wheat (13%) (Central Statistical Agency [CSA], 2008). Ethiopians are the first domesticator of this unique cereal in the world. Ethiopia is the center of origin and diversity for tef (Seyfu, 1997). According to Seyfu (1997), it can be grown from sea level up to 2,800 m.a.s.l, under various rainfalls, temperature and soil regimes. However, he emphasized that for better performance, it requires an altitude of 1,800–2,100 m.a.s.l., annual rain fall of 750–850 mm, and a temperature range of 10–27°C. It is predominantly cultivated on sandy loam to black clay soils.

In recent years, tef is receiving global attention among the cash crops and has been attracting an export market due to attention for its nutritional and health-related benefits (Provost & Jobson, 2014), especially due to the absence of gluten, a cause for celiac disease, in its grain (Fikadu et al., 2019; Seyfu, 1997; Spaenij-Dekking et al., 2005). Most of Ethiopian farmers are motivated to cultivate tef because of its relative merits over the other cereals with respect to husbandry, utilization and economic benefits (Assefa et al., 2011). Moreover, a much higher content of fiber and other nutrients such as minerals, vitamins and bioactive phenolic compounds than most other cereals (Gebremariam et al., 2014). Tef in Ethiopia is mainly used to make a traditional fermented-circular soft bread called injera or flat bread (Tatham et al., 1996); the cultivated food crops grown in Ethiopia, tef ranks first, with an estimated production area of 2730272.95 ha and a mean productivity of 1.38 t ha⁻¹ (CSA, 2013). Tef has the genetic potential to yield up to 6 t ha⁻¹ (Seyfu, 1993). In North Gondar, it was covered an estimated total land area of 124473.41 ha and 2093570.75 ton with average productivity was 1.68 t ha⁻¹ which is less than the national average productivity of 1.97 t ha ⁻¹ in 2015/2016 cropping season (CSA, 2016). Currently, tef is mainly cultivated under rainfed agriculture with very low (1.7 t ha⁻¹) yield (CSA, 2016) compared to productivity under irrigation (3.3 t ha⁻¹) (Yenesew, 2015). The low productivity of tef in Ethiopia is mainly attributed to its susceptibility to lodging, its small seed size, poor pre- and post-harvest agronomic management practices, and moisture stresses (Seyfu, 1997). Similarly, Haileselassie et al. (2011) studied tef production constraints in Tigray Region of northern Ethiopia, and found that in the highlands, poor soil fertility, and in the lowlands, low moisture stress, were the major constraints affecting tef production. Drought is one of the main challenges facing world agriculture, but its effects may vary from region to region. Ethiopia is one of the sub-Saharan African countries facing recurrent droughts leading to low crop productivity or crop failure and food insufficiency (Deressa & Hassan, 2009). Declining levels and high variability of rainfall is among the main causes for low crop productivity in different parts of Ethiopia (Tilahun, 2006). Yield losses of tef due to low moisture are estimated to reach up to 40% during severe stress (Ayele, 1993). Furthermore, yield reduction of up to 77% has been reported to have occurred as a result of drought at the anthesis stage of tef (Takele, 2001). Most regions of Ethiopia are suffering from insufficient and unreliable rainfall. Thus food insecurity has remained the major problem that is a great concern to the country. Therefore, the objective of this study was to evaluate, select, recommend best performing tef varieties for irrigation at Northern Gondar Amhara and similar areas.

2. Material and methods

2.1. Description of the study area

The experiment was conducted in a region where tef production was dominantly cultivated at Dembia, Northweastrn Gondar, Ethiopia, for a continuous two years of 2017/18 and 2018/19 irrigation seasonto select best adaptive and high yielder tef varieties. Dembia irrigation scheme is located Northweastrn Gondar, Ethiopia, 40 km to Gondar town and 220 km to Bahir Dar city at 12°17ʹ42.18" Northing and 37° 13ʹ 25.39" Easting, an altitude of 1856 masl with an average annual rain fall of 1,095 mm. The soil type of the study area is characterized by well-drained verti-soil. The average maximum and minimum temperature is 29°C and 13°C, respectively with an average annual rainfall of about 1,067 mm (Akalu et al., 2009). The area is characterized as mild altitude agro-ecology.

2.2. Experimental setup

A total of 36 varieties including the local check (Table 1) were evaluated in a randomized complete block design (RCBD) with three replications having 2 m length. The seed rate was used for the experiment was 15 kg ha⁻¹ and the spacing between row was 20 cm and sowing was drilled in a row. All agronomic practices including weeding, pesticide and insecticide were done equally for all treatments. Fertilizer was applied at the rate of 41/46 kgha⁻¹ N and P₂O₅ in the form of urea and DAP, respectively. Half of the total nitrogen and total phosphorus was applied at planting while the remaining nitrogen was applied at tillering (Deckers et al., 1998). Irrigation water was applied every three days interval for the first intital stage, five days interval at vegetative stage and eight days interval after heading to early maturity with furrow irrigation method (Savva & Frenke, 2002). Grass hopper and shoot fly were found the most challenging pests on the trial, and controlled by spraying the recommended chemical (diazinon 60%). Important agronomic practices such as plowing and weeding were performed as per the recommendation.

Table 1. Passport data of the released varieties included in the study as adopted from variety registry booklet issues of Ministry of Agriculture (MoA) until 2014

No.	Variety	Year of release	Releasing research center	Altitude (masl)	Annual rainfall (mm)	Days to maturity	Productivity (t ha^−1) under rainfed conditions
							On farm	At research station
1	DZ-01-99 (Asgori)	1970	Debre Zeit	1,500–2,400	300–700	80–130	1.7–2.2	2.4–3
2	DZ-01-196 (Magna)	1970	Debre Zeit	1,500–2,400	200–700	80–113	1.4–1.6	1.8–2.2
3	DZ-01-354 (Enatit)	1970	Debre Zeit	1,600–2,400	300–700	85–130	1.7–2.2	2.4–3.2
4	DZ-01-787 (Walankomi)	1978	Debre Zeit	2,800–2,500	400–700	90–130	1.7–2.2	2.4–3.0
5	DZ-Cr-44 (Menagasha)	1982	Debre Zeit	1,800–2,500	400–700	125–140	1.7–2.2	2.4–3.0
6	DZ-Cr-82 (Melko)	1982	Debre Zeit	1,700–2,000	300–700	112–119	1.8–2.2	2.4–2.8
7	DZ-Cr-37 (Tseday)	1984	Debre Zeit	1,500–2,200	150–200	82–90	1.4–1.9	1.8–2.8
8	DZ-Cr-255 (Gibe)	1993	DebreZeit	1,700–2,000	300–700	114–126	1.6–2.2	2.0–3.0
9	DZ-01-974 (Dukem)	1995	Debre Zeit	1,400–2,400	150–700	76–138	2-2.5	2.4–3.4
10	DZ-Cr-358 (Ziqala)	1995	Debre Zeit	1,400–2,400	150–700	75–137	1.8–2.4	2.1–3.6
11	Dz-01-2053 (Holeta key)	1998	Holetta	1,900–2,700	700–800	124–140	2.5	− 3.4
12	Dz-01-1278 (Ambo toke)	1999	Holetta	2,200–2,400	700–800	125–140	2.7	3.6
13	DZ-01-1281 (Gerado)	2002	Debre Zeit	1,850	>600	73–95	1.6–2.0	2.0–2.2
14	DZ-01-1285 (Koye)	2002	Debre Zeit	1,900–2,200	300–700	104–118	1.8–2.5	2.4–3.6
15	DZ-01-1681 (Kay tena)	2002	Debrezeit	1,600–1,900	300–500	84–93	1.6–2.0	2.0–2.2
16	Dz-01-2054 (Gola)	2003	Sirinka	1,450–1,850	660–1,025	68–100	1.6	1.1
17	PGRC/E205396 (Ajora)	2004	Areka	Low–medium	900–1,200	85–110	1.0–1.4	1.0–3.1
18	Dz-01-2675 (Degatef)	2005	Debre Zeit	1,800–2,500	997–1,200	112–123	1.6–2.0	1.8–2.8
19	Dz-01-1868 (Yilmana)	2005	Adet	200–2,600	>600	108	1.63	2.32
20	Dz-01-2423 (Dima)	2005	Adet	2,000–2,600	>600	105	1.68	2.46
21	Dz-01-146 (Genete)	2005	Sirinka	1,450–1,850	660–1,025	78–85	1.55	2.17
22	Dz-01-1821 (Zobel)	2005	Sirinka	1,450–1,850	660–1,025	78–85	1.51	2.07
23	Ho-cr-136 (Amarach)	2006	Debre Zeit	1,600–1,700	500–850	63–87	1.2	1.3
24	DZ-Cr-387/RIL-355 (Quncho)	2006	Debre Zeit	1,500–2,500	300–700	80–113	2.0–2.2	2.4–2.8
25	Dz-01-1880 (Guduru)	2006	Bako	1,850–2,500	1,000–1,200	132	1.4–2.0	1.5–2.3
26	Acc.205953 (Mechere)	2007	Sirinka	1,450–1,850	660–1,025	79	1.79	2.06
27	Dz-cr-387 RIL#127 (Gamechis)	2007	Melkassa	1,450–1,695	690–965	62–83	1–1.4	1.3–2.0
28	Dz-01-3186 (Etsub)	2008	Adet	1,800–2,600	1,230	92–117	1.6–2.2	1.9–2.7
29	DZ-01-899 (Gimbichu)	2005	Debre Zeit	2,000–2,500	2,000–2,500	−118–137	1.6–1.8	1.8–2.0
30	23-tafi-adi-72 (Kena)	2008	Bako	1,850–2,400	1,000–1,200	110–134	1.3–2.3	1.7–2.7
31	Dz-Cr-385 RIL295 (Simada)	2009	Debre Zeit	Low	300–700	88	1.7–2.0	1.8–2.2
32	SR-RIL-273 (Laketch)	2009	Sirinka	1,450–1,850	660–1,025	90	1.3–1.8	2.24
33	DZ-Cr-409/RIL50d (Boset)	2012	Debre Zeit	1,500–1,750	500–900	75–86	1.6–2.0	1.9–2.8
34	Dz-Cr-438 (Kora)	2014	Debre Zeit	1,700–2,400	700–1,200	−110–117	18–22	25–28
35	Acc. 21476A (Workiye)	2014	Sirinka	1,450–2,220	505–1,025	94	16	−22.2
36	Local	-	-	-	-	-	-	-

2.3. Data collection

Days to flowering: the number of days from 50% of the plots showing seedling emergence up to 50% of the plants in the plot flower. Days to maturity: the number of days from 50% of the plots showing seedling emergence up to 50% of the plants in the plot reaching phonological maturity stage (as evidenced by eye-ball judgment of the plant stands when the color is changed from green to color of straw). Plant height (cm): measured as the distance from the base of the stem of the main tiller to the tip of the panicle at maturity. Panicle length (cm): the length from the node where the first panicle branch starts up to the tip of the main panicle at maturity. Total biomass (t ha⁻¹): the weight of all the harvestable area including tillers harvested at the level of the ground. Grain yield (kg ha⁻¹): the weight of grain yield for all the harvestable area of plot.

2.4. Data analysis

All the collected data on yield and yield parameters were analyzed for variance as suggested by (Gomez & Gomez, 1984) using SAS software Version 9.0 (SAS Institute, 2002). Combined analysis of variance over years were carried out and Duncan’s Multiple Range Test (DMRT) test was used to compare the mean separations at 5% significance level.

3. Results and discussion

3.1. Analysis of variance

The combined analysis variance genotypes by year interaction showed highly significant (p < 0.01) difference for biomass yield, whereas significant for days to flowering, plant height and grain yield. However, the interaction exhibited also non-significant for days to maturity and panicle length while highly significant differences (p < 0.05) were observed among tasted genotypes for days to heading, days to maturity, plant height panicle length and grain yield and significant (p < 0.05) difference was observed for biomass yield (Table 2). Such considerable variations would provide a good opportunity for yield selection and improvement. Bakala et al. (2018) also conducted performance evaluation and adaptation trial of tef genotypes for moisture stress areas of Borena, Southern Oromia. They reported considerable variation in the days to flowering, plant height and grain yield of different tef varieties when planted over years. Moreover, similar result reported by Girma et al. (2019), genotypes by year interaction showed highly significant (P < 0.01) difference for days to heading, plant height and grain yield. While the interaction exhibited also non-significant for traits days to maturity and panicle length at Raya valley, Northern Ethiopia under irrigation season. They also reported that highly significant differences (P < 0.01) were observed among genotypes for panicle length and grain yield and significant (P < 0.05) difference were observed for days to heading, days to maturity and shoot biomass. Furthermore, this result is inline with different findings for the presence of significant variation among tef varieties for the traits days to heading, days to maturity, plant height, panicle length and grain yield (Basha et al., 2018). However, this result is in disagreement based on interaction significant difference for days to maturity and spike length were observed by Molla et al. (2012).

Table 2. Combined mean squares of days to heading, days to maturity, plant height, panicle length, grain yield and dry shoot biomass yield in Dembia district in 2017/18 and 2018/19 under irrigated seasons

Source of variation	DF	Days to heading	Days to maturity	Plant height (cm)	Panicle length (cm)	Grain yield (kg ha^−1)	Drybiomass(t h^−1)
Variety (V)	35	34.64**	46.55**	326.03**	51.01**	792773.3**	11.30**
Replication	2	4.31^ns	3.35^ns	537.12**	17.41^ns	17059.2^ns	51.52*
Year (Y)	1	133.80**	1628.0**	2699.47**	1059.57*	10455843.3*	3182.36**
V*Y	35	9.23*	12.55^ns	38.46*	10.94^ns	327126.9**	5.36*
Error	140	5.05	11.14	20.44	8.25	10625.5	3.55

Where, ns: non-siginificant, * and **: siginificant and highly siginificant, respectively.

3.2. Mean performance of genotypes phenological characters

3.2.1. Days to heading

In days to flowering, significant difference was observed in 2017 and 2018 irrigation seasons. The variation among varieties for days to heading ranged from 50.1 to 61.5 days. About 91.7% genotypes had mean performances lower than the local check for character days to heading, indicating those genotypes were early heading as compared to the others while two new varieties, namely Quncho and lakech, showed late heading over the others for days to heading (Table 3). This implied that the higher chance of selecting early varieties which can escape the terminal moisture stress which is one of the tef production problems in the study area. The longest (61.5) days to heading was recorded on local variety while the shortest/early (50.1 days) was recorded on Simada varieties (Table 3). Molla et al. (2012) also reported significant difference among the tested varieties for days to flowering in East Belessa, north western Ethiopia. Similarly, Girma et al. (2019) reported that significant difference among the tested tef varieties for days to flowering at Raya Valley, Northern, Ethiopia.

Table 3. Combined mean performance of released tef varieties for grain yield and other agronomic traits in Dembia district over 2017 and 2018 irrigation seasons

Variety	Days to heading	Days to to maturity	Plant height (cm)	Panicle length (cm)	Grain yield (kg ha^−1)	Dry shoot biomass (t ha^−1)
Enatit	57.5^c^–^g	94.67^a^–^e	88.07^f^–^j	35.67^a^–^h	2360.1^d^–^i	10.76^a^–^f
Asgori	59^a^–^e	90.83^d^–^h	81.47^kl	33.7^c^–^j	2184.5^e^–^l	9.48^b^–^j
Walankomi	58.5^a^–^e	90^e^–^h	94.7^b^–^e	37.27^abc	2627.6^b^–^e	11.88^abc
Magna	57.33^a^–^g	93.83^a^–^f	92.2^c^–^g	32.8^e^–^k	1948.2^i^–^n	10.18^a^–^h
Menagesha	58.83^a^–^e	94.5^a^–^f	90.9^c^–^g	36.4^a^–^f	1876.4^j^–^n	9.08^d^–^j
Melko	56.5^e^–^h	94.33^a^–^f	86.43^g^–^k	33.33^c^–^k	1796.2^k^–^n	10.80^a^–^f
Gibe	56.33^e^–^h	95.17^a^–^d	90.73^c^–^g	34.67^b^–^i	2993.3^ab	10.25^a^–^g
Dukem	61.17^ab	95^a^–^d	96.07^bc	37.23^abc	3079.7^a	11.85^abc
Ziqala	60.83^ab	91.83^b^–^g	86.1^g^–^k	32.77^e^–^k	1726.2^mn	7.59^h^–^j
Koye	57.33^c^–^g	95^a^–^d	82.4^jkl	32.9^e^–^k	1961.9^i^–^n	9.35^c^–^j
Quncho	60.33^abc	93^a^–^f	99.73^ab	37.83^ab	2164.2^f^–^m	10.35^a^–^g
Tseday	53^i	86.67^hi	75.37^m	30.3^j^–^m	1555.3^n	7.5133^ij
Gerado	57.17^efg	95.17^a^–^d	86.07^g^–^k	33.5^c^–^j	2532.1^c^–^g	11.45^a^–^e
Kaytena	57.17^c^–^g	92.5^a^–^g	82.6^i^–^l	32.7^e^–^k	2065.7^h^–^m	8.495^f^–^j
Kora	60^a^–^d	90.17^e^–^h	99.77^ab	37.07^a^–^d	2484.7^c^–^h	11.70^a^–^d
Simada	50.17^i	83.67^i	66.13^m	25.2^n	2071.3^h^–^m	7.22^j
Boset	54.5^ghi	88.17^gh	83.9^h^–^l	31.17^i^–^m	2619.7^b^–^f	8.88^e^–^j
Gimbichu	56.17^e^–^h	94.67^a^–^e	86.5^g^–^k	33.63^c^–^j	2653.3^bcd	10.38^a^–^g
Amarach	55.17^ghi	89.83^fgh	79.97^lm	32.33^f^–^m	2225^d^–^l	9.38^b^–^j
Holeta Key	57.67^a^–^f	91.67^b^–^g	79.07^lm	29.4^k^–^m	2109.7^g^–^m	9.59^b^–^j
Ambotoke	58.83^a^–^e	95.17^a^–^d	86.03^g^–^k	33.07^d^–^k	2368^d^–^i	9.40^b^–^j
Gamechis	57.17^c^–^g	91.17^c^–^g	95.37^bcd	35.33^a^–^h	2394.8^d^–^i	11.15^a^–^f
Gola	58.67^a^–^e	94.17^a^–^f	93.07^c^–^f	37.03^a^–^d	2868.8^abc	12.57^a
Genete	57.5^c^–^g	94.33^a^–^f	89.83^d^–^h	36.1^a^–^g	2533.9^c^–^g	11.15^a^–^f
Zobel	59^a^–^e	95.17^abc	88.63^e^–^i	34.43^b^–^i	2210.4^d^–^l	10.39^a^–^g
Mechare	57^d^–^h	94.33^a^–^f	89.17^e^–^h	35.6^a^–^h	2247.1^d^–^k	11.66^a^–^d
Lakech	61.17^ab	96.33^ab	93.03^c^–^f	33.27^c^–^k	2541.1^c^–^g	11.79^a^–^c
Yilmana	57.33^c^–^g	95.67^abc	84.33^h^–^l	32.3^g^–^m	1961.7^i^–^n	10.07^a^–^i
Etsub	58.17^b^–^f	94^a^–^f	93.97^b^–^f	36.47^a^–^e	2619.8^b^–^f	11.83^a^–^c
Dima	57.5^c^–^g	93.33^a^–^f	82.2^jkl	28.83^m	1978.5^i^–^n	8.05^g^–^j
Guduru	59^a^–^e	94.5^a^–^f	104.8^a	38.87^a	1781.8^l^–^n	9.84^b^–^j
Kena	60.83^ab	94.5^a^–^f	88.1^f^–^j	31.77^h^–^m	1828.9^j^–^n	10.59^a^–^g
Ajora align="center"	54^hi	92.67^a^–^g	88.03^f^–^j	33.5^c^–^j	2257^d^–^j	9.74^b^–^j
Degatef	56.67^e^–^h	94.17^a^–^f	90.57^f^–^j	34.83^b^–^i	2392.3^d^–^i	12.07^ab
Workiye	55.83^e^–^i	93.83^a^–^f	91.43^c^–^g	36.4^a^–^f	2479.6^c^–^h	9.52^b^–^j
Local	61.5^a	96.83^a	79.6^lm	29.07^lm	1969.7^i^–^n	10.61^a^–^j
Mean	57.62	93.07	87.95	33.8	2263	10.18
CV (%)	3.9	3.59	5.14	8.5	14.4	18.51
R-square(%)	70	70.02	85.06	73.56	76.7	88.32

Where, treatments (varieties) with the same letters are not significantly different.

3.2.2. Days to maturity

As the study result indicates, significant difference was observed among the tested genotypes for days to maturity, but it was non-significant difference for the interaction over year. The tasted varieties variation for days to maturity ranged from 83.7 to 96.8 days. The varieties Simada (83.7 days) had short period for maturity while local variety (96.8 days followed by Lakech (96.3 days) had long period for maturity. As compared to the overall varieties days to maturity, among 36 varieties, 35 exhibited lower days to maturity while as compared to the late maturing local check variety. This suggested that the higher chance of selecting early varieties for future breeding (Table 3). These results are in harmony with working on germplasm evaluation; Kebebew et al. (1999) and Girma et al. (2019) reported that days to maturity ranged from about 87 to 113 at Raya valley, Northern Ethiopia under Irrigation season.

3.2.3. Plant height

Plant height is an important feature that positively contribute to yield. The variation of tasted varieties for plant height ranged from 66.13.2 to 104.8 cm. Variety Guduru (104.8 cm) was recorded the highest plant height while the lowest plant height was recorded on variety Simada (61.13 cm) (Table 3). This finding in line with Girma et al. (2019) reported that highly significant differences (P < 0.01) among tasted varieties for plant height at Raya valley, Northern Ethiopia under Irrigation season. Moreover, this results in line with Abel (2005) reported that plant height varied from 41 to 95 cm. While this finding is not in line with Molla et al. (2012), which reported non-significant difference in plant height among tef varieties over years.

3.2.4. Panicle length

Variety Guduru (38.8 cm) shows maximum panicle length followed by varieties Quunco (37.9 cm) and Dukem (37.23 cm), whereas variety Simada (25.2 cm) shows minimum panicle length (Table 3). This results in line with Abel (2005) reported that panicle length varied from 17 to 42 cm. Similar result was also reported by Aliyi et al. (2016) who observed the tasted tef varieties for panicle length across the study locations, which was ranged from 29.56 to 41.18. Moreover, Girma et al. (2019) studied that tasted tef genotypes for panicle length ranged from 22.7 to 39.5 cm at Raya valley, Northern Ethiopia under irrigation season.

3.3. Yield and yield component

3.3.1. Shoot biomass yield

The highest shoot biomass tone per hectare were recorded at variety Gola (12.57 t ha⁻¹), Degetaef (12.03 t ha⁻¹), Dukem (11.887 t ha⁻¹) and Kora (11.7 t ha⁻¹) while the lowest shoot biomass was recorded at variety Simada (7.22 t ha⁻¹) (Table 3). This result in line with Girma et al. (2019) studied that, among tasted tef genotypes for biomass yield ranged from 8.0 to 14.25 ton per hectare at Raya valley, Northern Ethiopia under irrigation season and significant difference among tasted genotypes.

3.3.2. Grain yield

Variation in grain yield tone per hectare among genotypes extrapolated from yield per hectare is presented in Table 3. Accordingly, highly significant variability was observed among varieties for grain yield, which ranged from 1558 to 3078 kg ha⁻¹ with the mean value of 2261 kg ha⁻¹ and coefficient of variation of 14.4%. Based on the mean performances, varieties such as Dukem (3078 kg ha⁻¹), Gibe (2990.2 kg ha⁻¹) and Kora (2868 kg ha⁻¹) had mean performances higher than the local check variety (1969.7 kg ha⁻¹) for grain yield (Table 3). In addition, these varieties (Dukem, Gibe and Gola) showed yield advantage of 36.05%, 34.4% and 31%, respectively, over the local check (Table 3). This result in line with Molla et al. (2012) who studied farm performance evaluation of improved tef varieties in East Belessa, north western Ethiopia during main cropping season (July–September), and reported the stable and high yielding performance of Dukem variety. They also reported that significant grain yield among different tef varieties. Moreover, this result in line with Girma et al. (2019) studied that, among tasted tef genotypes for biomass yield ranged from 1.65 to 3.4 ton per hectare at Raya valley, Northern Ethiopia under irrigation season and significant difference among tasted genotypes. This finding was not in line with Aliyi et al. (2016), who observed that among the tested varieties across the testing locations for grain yield t/ha, which was ranged from 1.04 to 1.58 t ha⁻¹ with the mean value of 1.32 t ha⁻¹ under rain feed condition.

4. Conclusion and recommendations

From this study, the combined analysis of variance revealed that were observed that each of the tested varieties shows different performance for different characters such as, days to heading, days to maturity, panicle length, plant height and grain yield. Grain yield is an important trait to be emphasized for genotype selection to address the objective of the conducted activity. Despite the difference in performance of varieties for different parameters across years, varieties, namely Dukem, Gibe and Gola, had consistent performance for grain yield and gave yield advantage of 36.0%, 34.4% and 31% over the local check, respectively. Generally, the cultivation of improved tef varieties using both rainfied and irrigation seasons is unquestionable solution for food security and income for farmers by enhanced tef production and productivity, crop yield as compared to farmer local varieites. Therefore, these three varieties can be recommended for Dembia district and similar areas under irrigated production system.

correction

This article has been republished with minor changes. These changes do not impact the academic content of the article.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the Amhara Agricultural Research Institute, Gondar Agricultural Research Center for financing and providing working facility. We would like also to Dembia district bureau of agriculture for allowing their land to accomplish the activity.

Additional information

Funding

The authors received no direct funding for this research.

Notes on contributors

Asaye Birhanu

Asaye Birhanu is assistance researcher at Gondar Agricultural Research Center, Ethiopia. He had done research activities including Breeding, Agronomy, and related issues. He has the interest to conduct research focus on plant breeding and field crop management.

Yismaw Degenet

Yismaw Degenet is assistance researcher at Gondar Agricultural Research Center, Ethiopia. He had done research activities including Breeding, Agronomy, and related issues. He has the interest to conduct research focus on plant breeding and field crop management.

Zeyinu Tahir

Zeyinu Tahir is associate researcher at Gondar Agricultural Research Center, Ethiopia. He had done research activities including Breeding, Agronomy, and related issues. He has the interest to conduct research focus on plant breeding and field crop management.