Abstract
Background: Intrathoracic tuberculous (TB) lymphadenitis is a diagnostic challenge to the clinician. Although endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) can obtain a sample from the affected lymph node, the diagnosis of TB lymphadenitis by cytopathology remains inaccurate.
Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of EBUS-TBNA rinse fluid TB polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay for the diagnosis of intrathoracic TB lymphadenitis.
Methods: A retrospective study was conducted on 102 patients who underwent EBUS-TBNA for diagnostic evaluation of intrathoracic lymphadenopathy. EBUS-TBNA specimens were evaluated by cytopathological examination. Rinse fluid of the needle was routinely submitted for acid-fast bacillus (AFB) staining, mycobacterial culture, and TB-PCR using the AnyplexTM MTB/NTM real-time detection kit.
Results: Of 102 patients, 16 were diagnosed with intrathoracic TB lymphadenitis by either microbiology, cytopathology, or on clinical grounds. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of rinse fluid TB PCR assay were 56.2%, 100.0%, 100.0%, and 92.5%, respectively. Using the area under the ROC curve (AUC) as a measure of a diagnostic performance, TB-PCR had the highest AUC, compared with mycobacterial culture, AFB smear, and finding of necrotizing granulomatous inflammation (0.78, 0.75, 0.56, and 0.72, respectively). A combination of TB PCR, mycobacterial culture, and finding of necrotizing granulomatous inflammation provided the best diagnostic performance (sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and AUC of 75.0%, 100.0%, 100.0%, 95.6%, and 0.88, respectively).
Conclusions: EBUS-TBNA rinse fluid TB-PCR is useful in the diagnosis of intrathoracic TB lymphadenitis. Combining TB-PCR with mycobacterial culture and cytopathological findings improved the diagnosis performance.
Disclosure statement
All of us declare that we do not have a conflict of interest and that we do not have a financial relationship with a commercial entity that has an interest in the subject of this manuscript.
All of the authors have seen, approved and agreed to submit this paper. This work is not under active consideration for publication, has not been accepted for publication, nor has it been published, in full or in part. If you accept this paper, it will not be published elsewhere in the same form, in English or in any other language, without written consent of the copyright holder.