Higher accuracy of genotypic identification compared to phenotyping in the diagnosis of coagulase-negative staphylococcus infection in orthopedic surgery

Abstract

Purpose

To determine whether Repetitive Extragenic Palindromic PCR (rep-PCR) genotyping can improve the diagnosis of coagulase-negative staphylococcal (CoNS) orthopaedic infections in comparison to phenotyping.

Methods

Prospective study comparing the results of phenotypic/genotypic (rep-PCR) testing in patients with suspected CoNS infection. Each strain was analysed using both methods. Strains identified as identical in ≥2 samples were considered as pathogenic.

Results

255 CoNS strains from 52 surgical episodes were included. Infection was diagnosed by phenotyping in 38(73%) cases and by genotyping in 40(77%). The Kappa index was 0.59. Sensitivity, Specificity, Positive Predictive Value (PPV) and Negative Predictive Value (NPV) for phenotyping (vs. rep-PCR) were: 88%, 75%, 92%, and 64%. 5/14(36%) of cases not considered as true infections by phenotyping were diagnosed as infections with genotyping. In a subgroup of 203 strains from 41 surgical procedures with orthopaedic implants, the kappa index was 0.68. Sensitivity, Specificity, PPV, and NPV for phenotyping were: 93%, 73%, 90% and 80%. Again, 2/10 episodes in which CoNS were considered non-infective by phenotyping were diagnosed as infected by genotyping.

Conclusions

Rep-PCR genotyping can identify identical CoNS strains that differ in their phenotype and should be used as a complementary technique. One-third of infected cases may be misdiagnosed without genotypic analysis.

Keywords:

• Orthopaedic infection
• coagulase-negative staphylococci infection
• genotyping
• molecular diagnostic techniques
• Bone and joint infection

Ethical approval

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee for Clinical Research of the Hospital.

Disclosure statement

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.