56
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

Retrospective cohort study comparing two versus three blood culture sets in people who inject drugs

, , &
Pages 183-192 | Received 19 Jun 2023, Accepted 13 Nov 2023, Published online: 22 Nov 2023
 

Abstract

Background

The current standard of drawing two vs three blood culture sets lacks adequate guidance. Because people who inject drugs are at higher risk for bacteraemia and life-threatening infection, consideration of a third blood culture becomes more important.

Aim

To investigate the risks and benefits of obtaining two versus three blood culture sets.

Methods

Retrospective cohort study of adults who inject drugs at a multicentre catch-net hospital system from 2017–2022.

Findings

998 people who inject drugs and 2278 blood culture sets were analysed. There were 1618 episodes with two blood culture sets and 660 episodes with three. A potential benefit of adding a third blood culture was seen in 30 (4.5%) episodes. However, only 13 (2.0%) episodes showed pathogen-identifying benefit, as 17 (2.6%) involved known inadequately treated infections or the same pathogen in another culture. The number of blood culture sets needed to achieve diagnostic benefit was 51. There were more contaminants for three blood culture sets (65, 9.8%) than for two (114, 7.0%) (p < 0.00001). By adding a third blood culture, the risk of a contaminant increased by 39.7%; the number of blood culture sets needed to find a contaminant was 36. Of 122 episodes with only contaminants and available for analysis, 111 (91.0%) experienced at least one complication. 33 (27.0%) patients experienced either prolonged admission, readmission, or unnecessary antibiotic administration.

Conclusions

The benefits of possibly isolating a pathogen from a third blood culture set do not universally outweigh the risks for contaminant growth for people who inject drugs. A third blood culture should be considered in specific clinical scenarios (i.e. inadequately treated endocarditis and osteomyelitis).

Acknowledgements

We wish to thank Beth P. Landry, MHA, MT (ASCP) of University Medical Center New Orleans/Pathology for her help with providing information on the laboratory management and processing of blood culture sets.

Presentations

An abstract of this study was presented as a poster presentation at ID Week 2023 in Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

Disclosure statement

The authors have no financial or other incentives to disclose related to this project.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 174.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.