Abstract
Background
The prevalence of hepatitis C (HCV) among psychiatric patients is elevated compared to the background population in many studies, but the prevalence among Danish psychiatric patients is unknown. The aim of the study was to determine the HCV prevalence and the proportion of the psychiatric patient population that remains to be diagnosed and treated in a Danish setting.
Methods
During a 5-month period, patients attending the psychiatric emergency room in Vejle, Denmark, were offered point-of-care anti-HCV testing. Previous hepatitis C tests for all patients attending the Psychiatric Department in the study period were extracted from the national laboratory database (DANVIR). We combined the survey and register data in a capture–recapture estimate of undiagnosed patients with HCV.
Results
During the study 24.9% (589 of 2364) patients seen at the psychiatric department attended the emergency room. The prevalence of anti-HCV among those tested in the emergency room was 1.6%. The laboratory register identified 595/2364 patients previously tested for anti-HCV with a positive prevalence of 6.1%. The undiagnosed anti-HCV positives among the 1483 never tested was estimated to 1.1%. Thus the total estimated prevalence of anti-HCV was 2.3% (54/2364, 95% CI 1.7%–3.0%) in the population, of whom 70.4% had been diagnosed, and 72.2% of diagnosed patients had received treatment or cleared HCV.
Conclusion
Combining survey and register data showed that the WHO target of 90% diagnosed and 80% treated was not met. To eliminate HCV in the psychiatric population, both undiagnosed and untreated patients must be targeted.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank all staff in Psychiatric Emergency Room (PAM) in Vejle, Denmark, for the great effort of testing patients, and all the patients who were willing to participate in this study. We thank MD Martin Petri Bækby, Department of Infectious Diseases, Aarhus University Hospital, for thoughtful review of the manuscript.
Disclosure statement
P.B.C. has received grants and/or travel support from Gilead, BMS, Merck, Abbvie, Echosens and Roche. ALHØ has received research grants from Gilead Sciences and Medivir, speaker and consultancy fees from Abbvie, Gilead and BMS and travel support from Gilead Sciences, Abbvie, Merck and BMS. SD has received travel support and speaker fees from Gilead, Abbott, and AbbVie, and research grants from Gilead, all unrelated to the current study.
TVR PH, LWM, JFH, GBH and BTR have no conflict of interest.