249
Views
8
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Evaluation of governing heat and mass transfer resistance in membrane-based energy recovery ventilators with internal support structures

&
Pages 912-922 | Received 28 Sep 2016, Accepted 18 Apr 2017, Published online: 26 May 2017
 

Abstract

Energy recovery ventilators are an effective way to reduce energy consumption in buildings while satisfying ventilation standards. As membrane technology and manufacturing methods improve, membrane-based energy recovery ventilators are seeing increased market penetration. In the present study, the feasibility of membrane energy recovery ventilators designed to fit in a commercial building wall cavity is investigated. A heat and mass transfer resistance and pressure drop model is developed for a low aspect ratio (width/height) exchanger and is used to evaluate the sensible and latent effectiveness of a counter-flow energy recovery ventilator with internal support structures. The performance of strip-fin and pin-fin structures are compared and dominant heat and mass transfer resistances are investigated. It is shown that for all cases the sensible heat transfer is dominated by the convective resistance while the dominant mass transfer resistance shifted to the membrane at smaller hydraulic diameters. The results suggest that as membrane technology improves, enhancements to the airside heat and mass transfer coefficients will be required to continue to realize performance gains.

Nomenclature

A=

area (m2)

AR=

aspect  ratio ( − )

C=

concentration (mol · m− 3)

cp=

heat  capacitance (J · kg− 1 · K− 1)

d=

pin  diameter (m)

D=

diffusivity (m2 · s− 1)

DH=

hydraulic  diameter (m)

f=

friction  factor ( − )

F=

header  correction  factor ( − )

h=

heat  transfer  coefficient (W · m− 2 · K− 1)

hch=

channel  height (m)

i=

enthalpy (J · kg− 1)

j=

Colburn  j  factor ( − )

k=

thermal  conductivity (W · m− 1 · K− 1)

K=

overall  transfer  coefficient (m · s− 1)

l=

segment  length (m)

Lp=

pin  length (m)

m=

mass (kg)

MW=

molecular  weight (kg · mol− 1)

n=

number  of  moles ( − )

N=

quantity ( − )

Nu=

Nussult  number ( − )

P=

pressure (Pa)

=

perimeter (m)

Pr=

Prandtl  number ( − )

Q=

heat  transfered (J)

R=

resistance (K · W− 1, s · m− 3)

Re=

Reynolds  number ( − )

Sp=

streamwise  center-to − center  pin  spacing (m)

St=

Stanton  number ( − )

T=

temperature (K)

Tp=

transverse  center-to − center  pin  spacing (m)

U=

overall  transfer  coefficient (W · m− 2 · K− 1)

V=

velocity (m · s− 1)

W=

width (m)

Greek symbols
α=

thermal  diffusivity (m2 · s− 1)

β=

convective  mass  transfer  coefficient (m · s− 1)

δ=

membrane  thickness (m)

ϵ=

effectiveness (%)

θ=

ERV  header  angle (°)

ρ=

density (kg · m− 3)

φ=

relative  humidity (%)

ω=

absolute  humidity ( − )

Subscripts and superscripts
a=

dry air

c=

cross section

ch=

channel

d=

duct

e=

exhaust air stream

f=

fresh air stream

fg=

vaporization

HT=

heat transfer

i=

inlet

l=

latent

LM=

log-mean

m=

membrane

MT=

mass transfer

o=

outlet

p=

pin

s=

sensible

sat=

saturation

t=

transverse direction

v=

vapor

w=

wall

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 61.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 78.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.