Correction

This article refers to:

Too busy or too far away? The importance of subjective constraints and spatial factors for sports frequency

Article title: “Too busy or too far away? The importance of subjective constraints and spatial factors for sports frequency”

Authors: Deelen, I., Ettema, D., & Dijst, M.

Journal: Managing Sport and Leisure

Bibliometrics: Volume 21, Number 4, pages 239–264

DOI: 10.1080/23750472.2016.1255563

When the above article was published online and in print, the following sentence in the Measures was not included: “Higher scores on these dimensions of liveability should be interpreted as better neighbourhood liveability. For instance, a higher score on safety means less reported demolitions, crime and theft.”

When the above article was published online and in print, the following sentence in the Result was written incorrectly: “Better neighbourhood safety was associated with the experience of more accessibility constraints, whereas a more liveable neighbourhood housing stock was related to fewer accessibility constraints.”

The corrected sentence should be as follows: “Better neighbourhood safety, as well as a more liveable neighbourhood housing stock were associated with the experience of fewer accessibility constraints.”

When the above article was published online and in print, the following sentence in the Result was written incorrectly: “Whereas a higher score on housing stock liveability was associated with fewer skills/knowledge constraints, a higher score on safety led to more skills/knowledge constraints.”

The corrected sentence should be as follows: “Both a higher score on housing stock liveability and a higher score on safety were associated with fewer skills/knowledge constraints.”

When the above article was published online and in print, the following sentence in the Discussion was written incorrectly: “Furthermore, our results showed that living in a safer neighbourhood was associated with the experience of more partner and skills/knowledge constraints. Because our data showed that a higher score on neighbourhood safety was correlated with rural environments, it is likely that it is more difficult for rural participants to find likeminded sports partners and sports opportunities in their neighbourhood.”

The corrected sentence should be as follows: “Furthermore, our results showed that living in a safer neighbourhood was associated with the experience of fewer partner and skills/knowledge constraints. Because our data showed that a higher score on neighbourhood safety was correlated with rural environments, it is likely that it is less difficult for rural participants to find likeminded sports partners and sports opportunities in their neighbourhood.”

This article is available both online and in print. The online version has been corrected.