This article analyzes knowledge-intensive business services (KIBS) clustering and location patterns in Greater Mexico City. Although there is evidence of the importance of KIBS clustering as a factor that precedes innovation, no empirical work has applied point pattern analysis methods to identify intrametropolitan patterns. Little is known about KIBS firms clustering in Mexico and emerging economies in general. This study responds to both challenges, using the M and m functions, point pattern analysis methods that allow capturing concentration intensity and overdensity of same-type KIBS firms, respectively. Firm-level data are taken from Mexico’s National Statistics and Geography Institute’s (INEGI) open-source databases for 2010 and 2020. Results suggest different clustering patterns given our proposed KIBS classification. Overall, the clustering intensity of KIBS firms by class has increased during the analyzed period (2010–2020). Also, although central Greater Mexico City is the main clustering pole of attraction, urban subcenters display KIBS firms clustering depending on proposed KIBS classes. Clustering patterns are explained given existing intrametropolitan infrastructure and value-added differences, but also within- and between-class concentration variations. Despite the lack of firm-level economic data, results allow inferring possible agglomeration mechanisms behind clustering patterns.
1 Knowledge spillovers are monetary and productive benefits stemming from proximity and collaboration between firms, expressed by the use of “partially non-rival” (e.g., workforce education) and exclusive human capital, such as patents (Henderson Citation2007, 497).
2 For a definition of the medium-high and high-technology industrial sector, see OECD (2011), and Shearmur et al. (Citation2015).
3 The concept of territorial servitization refers to the geographical proximity between KIBS and manufacturing given their productive integration in the search for new monetization flows (see Lafuente, Vaillant, and Vendrell-Herrero Citation2017, Citation2019).
4 Urbanization economies of agglomeration refers to pecuniary and nonpecuniary benefits accrued through labor market sharing or pooling, propensity to reach out to more clients (city size), and diversity of economic activity (for discussions, see Brunow, Hammer, and McCann Citation2020; Peng et al.Citation2022).
5 It should be noted that most studies concerning KIBS in Mexico do not follow a spatial approach (see Arroyo-López and Cárcamo-Solís Citation2009; López and Ramos Citation2013; Pérez-Campuzano, Sánchez-Zárate, and Cuadrado-Roura Citation2018; Romero-Amado, López-Toache, and Sánchez-Daza Citation2018; Garrido-Rodríguez and Pérez-Campuzano Citation2019). There are, however, case studies that present city- and industry-specific findings (see Carrillo and Matus Citation2020; Graizbord and Santiago Citation2021).
6 In Mexico, the municipio is the smallest political administrative division of the country’s territory.
7 Acronym for North American Industrial Classification System (see INEGI Citation2018b). A five-digit NAICS level is used in this study (see ).
8 This is an important fact of the M and m functions as there are no edge corrections to be made to estimations (e.g., in Ripley’s K; see Ripley Citation1977). The total area of analysis is determined by firms’ locations and not administrative area sizes (Marcon and Puech Citation2017).
9 But also, of similar point pattern methods in general; see Gómez-Antonio and Alañón-Pardo (Citation2020) for a thorough review of these methods.
10 AGEB is the Spanish acronym for Area Geoestadística básica (Basic Geostatistical Area).
Henderson, J. V. 2007. Understanding knowledge spillovers. Regional Science and Urban Economics37 (4):497–508. doi: 10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2006.11.010.
Shearmur, R., C. Garrocho, J. A. Álvarez-Lobato, and T. Chávez-Soto. 2015. Hacia una geografía de las actividades económicas en la Ciudad de México: Métodos, conceptos, cultura y subjetividad [Towards a geography of economic activities in Mexico City: Methods, concepts, culture and subjectivity]. In Geografía aplicada en Iberoamérica: Avances, retos y perspectivas, ed. C. Garrocho and G. Buzai, 431–72. El Colegio Mexiquense, Zinacantepec, México.
Lafuente, E., Y. Vaillant, and F. Vendrell-Herrero. 2017. Territorial servitization: Exploring the virtuous circle connecting knowledge-intensive services and new manufacturing businesses. International Journal of Production Economics192:19–28. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2016.12.006.
Lafuente, E., Y. Vaillant, and F. Vendrell-Herrero. 2019. Territorial servitization and the manufacturing renaissance in knowledge-based economies. Regional Studies53 (3):313–19. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2018.1542670.
Brunow, S., A. Hammer, and P. McCann. 2020. The impact of KIBS’ location on their innovation behaviour. Regional Studies54 (9):1289–1303. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2019.1684463.
Peng, D., R. Li, C. Shen, and Z. Wong. 2022. Industrial agglomeration, urban characteristics, and economic growth quality: The case of knowledge-intensive business services. International Review of Economics & Finance81:18–28. doi: 10.1016/j.iref.2022.05.001.
Arroyo-López, P., and L. Cárcamo-Solís. 2009. El desarrollo de KIBS en México: El sector servicios en el contexto de la economía del conocimiento [The development of KIBS in Mexico: The services sector in the context of the knowledge economy]. Economía y sociedad 14 (23):65–78.
López, A., and D. Ramos. 2013. ¿Pueden los servicios intensivos en conocimiento ser un nuevo motor de crecimiento en América Latina? [Can knowledge-intensive services in Latin America be a new engine for growth?]. Revista Iberoamericana de Ciencia, Tecnología y Sociedad-CTS 8 (24):81–113.
Pérez-Campuzano, E., A. Sánchez-Zárate, and J. Cuadrado-Roura. 2018. Distribución espacial del sector servicios en México, 1999-2009 [Spatial distribution of the services sector in Mexico, 1999–2009]. EURE (Santiago)44 (131):215–38. doi: 10.4067/S0250-71612018000100215.
Romero-Amado, J., V. López-Toache, and G. Sánchez-Daza. 2018. Las condiciones laborales en la industria de los servicios empresariales intensivos en conocimiento (SEIC) en México en el nuevo siglo [Labor conditions in the knowledge-intensive business services (KIBS) industry in Mexico in the new century]. Análisis Económico33 (83):145–75. doi: 10.24275/uam/azc/dcsh/ae/2018v33n83/romero.
Garrido-Rodríguez, L. A., and E. Pérez-Campuzano. 2019. Situación del empleo en el sector servicios del México Metropolitano [The situation of employment in the services sector in metropolitan Mexico]. Papeles de población 25 (101):83–111.
Carrillo, J., and M. Matus. 2020. Will the Mexican auto parts maquilas be able to transit to I4.0? Paradigma económico. Revista de economía regional y sectorial12 (2):39–61. doi: 10.36677/paradigmaeconomico.v12i2.14372.
Graizbord, B., and L. E. Santiago. 2021. La industria cultural en las ciudades de México: Los servicios simbólicos intensivos en conocimiento (SIC-simbólicos) [The cultural industry in Mexico’s cities: The knowledge-intensive symbolic services (symbolic-SIC)]. EURE47 (141):27–47. doi: 10.7764/EURE.47.141.02.
INEGI. 2018b. Sistema de clasificación Industrial de América del Norte 2018 (SCIAN 2018) [North American Industrial Classification System 2018 (SCIAN 2018)]. National Statistics and Geography Institute (INEGI), Mexico City, Mexico. Accessed March 12, 2022. https://www.inegi.org.mx/app/scian/.
Ripley, B. D. 1977. Modelling spatial patterns. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B Methodological39 (2):172–92. doi: 10.1111/j.2517-6161.1977.tb01615.x.
Marcon, E., and F. Puech. 2017. A typology of distance-based measures of spatial concentration. Regional Science and Urban Economics62:56–67. doi: 10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2016.10.004.
Gómez-Antonio, M., and Á. Alañón-Pardo. 2020. Point pattern methods for analyzing industrial location. Investigación Económica79 (314):51–74. doi: 10.22201/fe.01851667p.2020.314.75474.