663
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Mitogenome Announcement

Complete chloroplast genome of Prunus rufa (Rosaceae), a wild flowering cherry endemic to the Himalayan region

, , &
Pages 160-161 | Received 12 Nov 2019, Accepted 23 Nov 2019, Published online: 13 Dec 2019

Abstract

Prunus rufa is a species of Prunus native to the Himalayan region. We determined the first complete chloroplast genome of P. rufa using a genome skimming approach. The cp genome was 157,723 bp long, with a large single-copy region (LSC) of 85,860 bp and a small single-copy region (SSC) of 19,081 bp separated by a pair of inverted repeats (IRs) of 26,391 bp each. It encodes 129 genes, including 84 protein-coding genes, 37 tRNA genes, and 8 ribosomal RNA genes. We also reconstructed the phylogeny of Prunus sensu lato using maximum-likelihood (ML) method, including our data and previously reported cp genomes of related taxa. The phylogenetic analysis indicated that P. rufa is closely related to Prunus cerasoides.

Prunus rufa Hook.f. is a wild cherry species of Prunus endemic to the Himalayan region, extending from Nepal, E Himalaya to Tibetan Plateau (Ohba and Akiyama Citation2010; Ohba et al. Citation2012). The classification of the Prunus sensu lato (Rosaceae) has long been problematic; phylogenetic studies using a limited set of markers have often not been able to fully resolve relationships within this genus, indicating that a higher number of molecular characters are required for an improved understanding of relationships within this group (Shi et al. Citation2013; Chin et al. Citation2014). By taking advantage of next-generation sequencing technologies that efficiently provide the chloroplast (cp) genomic resources of the species under study, we can rapidly access the abundant genetic information for phylogenetic research and conservation genetics (Liu et al. Citation2017, Citation2018). Therefore, we sequenced the whole chloroplast genome of P. rufa to elucidate its phylogenetic relationship with other P. sensu lato.

Total genomic DNA was extracted from silica-dried leaves collected from the living collections (accession no: 1987.0221) of the Sir Harold Hillier Gardens (Romsey, Hampshire, United Kingdom) using a modified CTAB method (Doyle and Doyle Citation1987). A voucher specimen (Clarke1805001) was collected and deposited in the Herbarium of Taizhou University. DNA libraries preparation and pair-end 125 bp read length sequencing were performed on the Illumina HiSeq 2500 platform. About 10.5 GB of clean data were trimmed and assembled into contigs using CLC Genomics Workbench 8. All the contigs were then mapped to the reference cp genome of Prunus speciosa (Koidz.) Nakai (MH998233; Sun et al. Citation2019) using BLAST (NCBI BLAST v2.2.31) search and the draft cp genome of P. rufa was constructed by connecting overlapping terminal sequences in Geneious R11 software (Biomatters Ltd., Auckland, New Zealand). Gene annotation was performed via the online program Dual Organellar Genome Annotator (DOGMA; Wyman et al. Citation2004).

The complete cp genome of P. rufa (GenBank accession MN648456) was 157,723 bp long consisting of a pair of inverted repeat regions (IRs with 26,391 bp) divided by two single-copy (SC) regions (Large SC[LSC] with 85,860 bp; small SC [SSC] with 19,081 bp). The overall GC contents of the total length, LSC, SSC, and IR regions were 36.7, 34.6, 30.2, and 42.5%, respectively. The genome contained a total of 129 genes, including 84 protein-coding genes, 37 tRNA genes, and 8 rRNA genes.

We used a total of 20 additional complete cp genomes of the P. sensu lato species to clarify the phylogenetic position of P. rufa. Prunus serotina Ehrh. (NC036133) and Prunus padus L. (NC026982) in Subg. Padus was used as the outgroup. We reconstructed a phylogeny employing the GTR + G model and 1000 bootstrap replicates under the maximum-likelihood (ML) inference in RAxML-HPC v.8.2.10 on the CIPRES cluster (Miller et al. Citation2010). The ML tree () was consistent with the most recent phylogenetic study on P. sensu lato (Shi et al. Citation2013; Chin et al. Citation2014). Prunus rufa exhibited the closest relationship with Prunus cerasoides D. Don.

Figure 1. Phylogenetic tree reconstruction of 21 taxa of Prunus sensu lato using maximum-likelihood (ML) method. Relative branch lengths are indicated. Numbers near the nodes represent ML bootstrap value. The scientific names of some species are debated.

Figure 1. Phylogenetic tree reconstruction of 21 taxa of Prunus sensu lato using maximum-likelihood (ML) method. Relative branch lengths are indicated. Numbers near the nodes represent ML bootstrap value. The scientific names of some species are debated.

Disclosure statement

The authors are grateful to the opened raw genome data from public database. The authors report no conflicts of interest and are responsible for the content and writing of the paper.

Additional information

Funding

This research was supported by Taizhou University Foundation [2017PY034], the Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province [LQ19C030001] and Public Welfare Projects of Zhejiang Province [2017C32082].

References

  • Chin SW, Shaw J, Haberle R, Wen J, Potter D. 2014. Diversification of almonds, peaches, plums and cherries – molecular systematics and biogeographic history of Prunus (Rosaceae). Molec Phylogen Evol. 76:34–48.
  • Doyle JJ, Doyle JL. 1987. A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochem Bull. 19:11–15.
  • Liu LX, Li R, Worth JRP, Li X, Li P, Cameron KM, Fu CX. 2017. The complete chloroplast genome of Chinese bayberry (Morella rubra, Myricaceae): implications for understanding the evolution of Fagales. Front Plant Sci. 8:968.
  • Liu LX, Li P, Zhang HW, Worth J. 2018. Whole chloroplast genome sequences of the Japanese hemlocks, Tsuga diversifolia and T. sieboldii, and development of chloroplast microsatellite markers applicable to East Asian Tsuga. J. Forest Res. 23(5):318–323.
  • Miller MA, Pfeiffer W, Schwartz T. 2010. Creating the CIPRES Science Gateway for inference of large phylogenetic trees. Gateway Comp Env Workshop. 14:1–8.
  • Ohba H, Akiyama S. 2010. Four new species of Himalayan Prunus subgenus Cerasus (Rosaceae-Prunoideae). Bull Nat Museum Nat Sci, Ser. B. 36(4):133–140.
  • Ohba H, Pendry CA, Rajbhandary S. 2012. Prunus. In: Watson MF, Akiyama S, Ikeda H, Pendry CA, Rajbhandari KR, Shrestha KK, editors. Flora of Nepal, Rosaceae: Webedition 2. Edinburgh (UK): Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh.
  • Shi S, Li J, Sun J, Yu J, Zhou S. 2013. Phylogeny and classification of Prunus sensu lato (Rosaceae). J Integr Plant Biol. 55(11):1069–1079.
  • Sun ZS, Katsuki T, Liu XH. 2019. Complete chloroplast genome of the wild Oshima Cherry (Prunus speciosa, Rosaceae) in Izu islands, Japan. Mitochondrial DNA Part B. 4(1):509–510.
  • Wyman SK, Jansen RK, Boore JL. 2004. Automatic annotation of organellar genomes with DOGMA. Bioinformatics. 20(17):3252–3255.