621
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Mitogenome Announcement

Characterization of the first chloroplast genome of Tabebuia (Bignoniaceae)

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 2954-2956 | Received 08 Jun 2020, Accepted 20 Jun 2020, Published online: 23 Jul 2020

Abstract

The chloroplast genome of Tabebuia nodosa is described and characterized here. This species is endemic to the Chaco and the first species of Tabebuia to have its organelle genome sequenced, providing a genomic resource for phylogenetic inferences. The plastome of T. nodosa is 158,454 bp in length, with a large single-copy of 85,406 bp, a small single-copy of 12,785 bp, and inverted repeats of 30,116 bp each. It contains 131 genes, with 86 protein-coding genes, 37 tRNA, and 8 rRNA. Overall, the GC content is 38.2%. The T. nodosa plastome resembles the structural organization of plastomes commonly found in flowering plants, including those of other genera of Bignoniaceae. A phylogenetic analysis combining a subset of Bignoniaceae plastomes confirms the placement of T. nodosa within the Tabebuia alliance with maximum support.

Tabebuia Gomes ex DC. (Bignoniaceae) is a charismatic genus composed by trees and shrubs (Gentry Citation1992a; Grose and Olmstead Citation2007a). The genus currently includes approximately 67 species distributed throughout the Neotropics and centered in Central America and the Great Antilles (Grose and Olmstead Citation2007b). Tabebuia is included within the Tabebuia Alliance, which includes conspicuous members of several tropical forests that are often used as ornamentals due to its showy flowers (Gentry Citation1992a). The only phylogenetic study to date focusing on the Tabebuia Alliance sequenced the plastid regions trnL-F and ndhF of 15 species of Tabebuia (Grose and Olmstead Citation2007a).

Tabebuia nodosa (Griseb.) Griseb. is one of the few species of Tabebuia that occurs in the Chaco (Grose and Olmstead Citation2007b). This species is characterized by the reduced leaves (<4 cm in width) and yellow corollas (Gentry Citation1992b). T. nodosa has never been sampled in a phylogenetic study and its placement remains uncertain. Here, we present the complete plastome of T. nodosa (NCBI accession number MT447061), the first plastome available for the genus and use this information to provide its phylogenetic placement.

For this study, we selected the specimen J.M. Silva 4864, collected in Brazil, Mato Grosso do Sul, Porto Murtinho (long. −57.8824, lat. −21.699) and deposited at the herbarium SPF, from the Universidade de São Paulo (SPF178881). Total genomic DNA (gDNA) was extracted using the Invisorb® Spin Plant Mini Kit (Invitek, Berlin, Germany). Total gDNA was sequenced and the plastome edited and annotated following the steps detailed in Fonseca and Lohmann (Citation2017). In brief, libraries were assembled with insert size of 300 bp and sequenced using pair-end (2 × 100) on an Illumina HiSeq 2000 system (Illumina Inc., San Diego, CA, USA). A total of 12,712,835 paired-end reads were assembled de novo using the steps described in the Fast-Plast pipeline (https://github.com/mrmckain/Fast-Plast; McKain and Wilson, unpublished). Annotation was initially conducted using Chlorobox GeSeq (Tillich et al. Citation2017) and confirmed in Geneious version 7.1.9 (Kearse et al. Citation2012).

To infer the phylogenetic placement of T. nodosa within the Bignoniaceae, we used the 80 plastome genes used to infer the phylogeny of Angiosperms by Li et al. (Citation2019). DNA sequences were aligned in MAFFT version 7.309 (Katoh et al. Citation2017). Phylogenetic reconstructions were conducted using 17 plastome sequences, representing 14 species of Bignoniaceae and three outgroups. This dataset was complemented with plastid sequences from three Bignoniaceae species obtained from the OneKP Project (Li et al. Citation2019). Phylogenetic inferences were conducted using maximum likelihood (ML) with RAxML version 8.2.9 (Stamatakis Citation2014) and Bayesian criteria (BC) with MrBayes version 3.2 (Ronquist et al. Citation2012). Branch support was estimated for ML using 1000 bootstrap replicates (bs) and for BC using posterior probabilities (pp).

The T. nodosa plastome recovered has the typical quadripartite structure, including a single monomer of 158,454 bp in length, with a large single-copy region of 85,406 bp and a small single-copy region of 12,785 bp, separated by two inverted repeat regions of 30,116 bp each. The genome contains 131 genes, including 86 protein-coding genes, 37 tRNA, and 8 rRNA. The plastome structure, gene content, and gene order of T. nodosa resembles that of other Bignoniaceae (Fonseca and Lohmann Citation2017, Citation2018; Ma et al. Citation2020). Like several other Bignoniaceae, T. nodosa also shows a total inclusion of the gene ycf1 in the inverted repeated region (Fonseca and Lohmann Citation2017, Citation2018; Ma et al. Citation2020). The overall GC content is 38.2%, while the GC content of the individual plastome regions is 36.5% for the LSC, 33.4% for the SSC, and 41.7% for each of the IR regions.

The topologies inferred by ML and BC are identical and concordant with the currently available phylogeny of the Bignoniaceae (Olmstead et al. Citation2009). Tabebuia nodosa is strongly supported (bs = 100, pp = 1) as sister to a clade composed of Handroanthus umbellatus (Sond.) Mattos and Crescentia cujete L. (). This topology corroborates the informally named Tabebuia Alliance clade, which includes Crescentia, Handroanthus, Tabebuia, and eight other genera (Olmstead et al. Citation2009). This phylogeny also corroborates the narrower circumscription of Tabebuia, excluding Handroanthus (Grose and Olmstead Citation2007a; Olmstead et al. Citation2009).

Figure 1. Bayesian mcc tree derived from the analysis of 80 plastid genes. Values above branches denote posterior probabilities and bootstrap values, respectively. 

Figure 1. Bayesian mcc tree derived from the analysis of 80 plastid genes. Values above branches denote posterior probabilities and bootstrap values, respectively. 

Acknowledgments

We thank the Core Facility for Scientific Research from the Universidade de São Paulo (CEFAP-USP/GENIAL) for allowing us to use the Covaris S2 sonicator, Qubit, and the SEAL server.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Data availability statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available in GenBank of NCBI at https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov, reference number MT447061.

Additional information

Funding

L.H.M.F. is supported by a CAPES (Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior) postdoctoral fellowship, and L.G.L. is supported by a Pq-1B grant [310871/2017-4] from CNPq [Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico].

References

  • Fonseca LHM, Lohmann LG. 2017. Plastome rearrangements in the “Adenocalymma-Neojobertia” clade (Bignonieae, Bignoniaceae) and its phylogenetic Implications. Front Plant Sci. 8:1875.
  • Fonseca LHM, Lohmann LG. 2018. Combining high-throughput sequencing and targeted loci data to infer the phylogeny of the “Adenocalymma-Neojobertia” clade (Bignonieae, Bignoniaceae). Mol Phylogenet Evol. 123:1–15.
  • Gentry AH. 1992a. A synopsis of Bignoniaceae ethnobotany and economic botany. Ann Missouri Bot. 79(1):53–64.
  • Gentry AH. 1992b. Bignoniaceae – part II (tribe Tecomeae). Flora Neotropica. Vol. 25. Bronx (NY): New York Botanial Garden.
  • Grose SO, Olmstead RG. 2007a. Evolution of a charismatic neotropical clade: molecular phylogeny of Tabebuia s.l., Crescentieae, and allied genera (Bignoniaceae). Syst Bot. 32(3):650–659.
  • Grose SO, Olmstead RG. 2007b. Taxonomic revisions in the polyphyletic genus Tabebuia s.l. (Bignoniaceae). Syst Bot. 32(3):660–670.
  • Katoh K, Rozewicki J, Yamada KD. 2017. MAFFT online service: multiple sequence alignment, interactive sequence choice and visualization. Brief Bioinform. 20:1160–1166.
  • Kearse M, Moir R, Wilson A, Stones-Havas S, Cheung M, Sturrock S, Buxton S, Cooper A, Markowitz S, Duran C, et al. 2012. Geneious basic: an integrated and extendable desktop software platform for the organization and analysis of sequence data. Bioinformatics. 28(12):1647–1649.
  • Li HT, Yi TS, Gao LM, Ma PF, Zhang T, Yang JB, Gitzendanner MA, Fritsch PW, Cai J, Luo Y, et al. 2019. Origin of angiosperms and the puzzle of the Jurassic gap. Nat Plants. 5(5):461–470.
  • Ma Q, Zhang J, Zhang J. 2020. The complete chloroplast genome of Catalpa ovata G. Don. (Bignoniaceae). Mitochondr DNA B. 5(2):1800–1801.
  • Olmstead RG, Zjhra ML, Lohmann LG, Grose SO, Eckert AJ. 2009. A molecular phylogeny and classification of Bignoniaceae. Am J Bot. 96(9):1731–1743.
  • Ronquist F, Teslenko M, Mark P, Ayres DL, Darling A, Höhna S, Larget B, Liu L, Suchard MA, Huelsenbeck JP. 2012. MrBayes 3.2: efficient bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Syst Biol. 61(3):539–542.
  • Stamatakis A. 2014. RAxML version 8: a tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics. 30(9):1312–1313.
  • Tillich M, Lehwark P, Pellizzer T, Ulbricht-Jones ES, Fischer A, Bock R, Greiner S. 2017. GeSeq-versatile and accurate annotation of organelle genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 45(W1):W6–W11.