782
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Mitogenome Announcement

Complete mitochondrial genomes of two water mite species: Hygrobates (H.) longiporus and Hygrobates (rivobates) taniguchii (Acari, Trombidiformes, Hygrobatoidea)

, , , , &
Pages 2969-2971 | Received 18 Jun 2020, Accepted 27 Jun 2020, Published online: 23 Jul 2020

Abstract

We determined the complete mitochondrial genome sequences of two water mites, Hygrobates (Hygrobates) longiporus and H. (Rivobates) taniguchii. The length of the entire mitogenome of these two species is 13,721 bp and 13,770 bp long, respectively. Both of them contain 13 proteins, two rRNAs, and 22 tRNAs for a total of 37 gene products. The gene order of Hygrobates is almost identical to the two species of Unionicola we included in the analysis, with some difference in the position of transfer RNA genes. Phylogenetic analyses highly support these Hygrobates species form a clade with other species of the Hygrobatoidea.

Diverse assemblages of water mites are present in almost all freshwater environments around the world except Antarctica. The diversity of the water mites is now rapidly becoming apparent, with over 10,000 species estimated to be present (Di Sabatino et al. Citation2008), while approximately 7,500 species have been described so far (Smit in press). Recently as well as molecular research on water mites greatly developed; molecular studies showed the monophyly of the Hydrachnidia as well as all but one of the traditional superfamilies (Dabert et al. Citation2016). In several studies, cryptic species, as well as species complexes, have been detected (Martin et al. Citation2010; Pešić & Smit Citation2016, Citation2017, Citation2018; Pešić et al. Citation2017, Citation2019; Blattner et al. Citation2019). Water mites reach great abundance and diversity in several freshwater environments and are associated with a variety of macrofauna––adults and deutonymphs of most species are predators mainly on microcrustaceans and aquatic insect eggs and larvae (one group has been found to parasitize amphibians (Goldschmidt et al. Citation2020)) but the larvae are parasites of aquatic insects. Therefore, it has been noted that they are excellent bioindicators (Goldschmidt Citation2016). On the contrary, their diversity is greatly underestimated, suggesting the presence of multiple cryptic species within many morphological species (Pešić et al. Citation2017; Blattner et al. Citation2019).

Thus, more genetic information is urgent to elucidate phylogenetic relationships and genetic structure for revising taxonomy and species diversity in water mites. However, there was no mitogenome record for the family Hygrobatidae, one of the major families in water mites. So, we choose two Hygrobates species for the representative of the family and determined the whole mitogenome sequences by shotgun sequencing for both species.

Total DNA was extracted using DNeasy Blood & Tissue Kit (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany) and processed by QIAseq FX DNA Library kit (QIAGEN). Paired-end sequencing (300 cycles) was conducted by National Museum of Nature and Science, Tokyo on MiSeq, with inserts of ca. 50–200 bp, for a total of ca. four million reads. Assembly was performed using CLC Genomics Workbench ver. 12 (QIAGEN) with default setting. Ambiguous part of the contig was proofread by 3500 xL Genetic Analyzer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Gene identification was done using MITOS web server (Bernt et al. Citation2013). Voucher specimens with extracted DNA were deposited to National Museum of Nature and Science, Tokyo (NSMT-DNA 49380 and 49381).

The entire mitogenome of Hygrobates (Hygrobates) longiporus Thor, 1898 (GenBank/DDBJ/EMBL accession number LC552026) and Hygrobates (Rivobates) taniguchii Imamura, 1954 (LC552027) is 13,721 bp and 13,770 bp long, respectively. Both of them contain 13 proteins, two rRNAs, and 22 tRNAs for a total of 37 gene products. The overall A + T content of the H. (H.) longiporus and H. (R.) taniguchii mitochondrial genome is 72.5 and 67.9%, respectively, which is in ordinal range among Parasitengona species (67.5–73.6%). In the mitogenomes of both species, ND5 starts with CTT codon and stops with incomplete termination condon T. The gene order of Hygrobates is almost identical to the species of genus Unionicola, with some difference in the position of transfer RNA genes.

The maximum-likelihood phylogenetic analysis (ML) based on 13 protein coding genes was conducted by RAxML-NG ver.0.9.0 (Kozlov et al. Citation2019) with bootstrap analyses of 1,000 replicates. The phylogenetic tree also with posterior probability from Bayesian analyses (BA) conducted by MrBayes 3.2.6 (Ronquist et al. Citation2012). H. (H.) longiporus and H. (R.) taniguchii. made a sister clade with species belonging to superfamily Hygrobatoidea (Unionicola parkeri and U. foili) with high nodal support value (). These mitogenomes would be useful for reconstructing higher systematics of Hydrachnid mites.

Figure 1. Maximum-likelihood tree based on the concatenated nucleotide sequence of 13 protein-coding genes of Hygrobates (Hygrobates) longiporus (LC552026) and Hygrobates (Rivobates) taniguchii (LC552027), three further Hydrachnidia and four Trombiculoidea species. Accession numbers of the mitogenome sequences for each taxon used in the phylogenetic analysis are shown in parentheses. Nodal values are ML bootstrap support values (BS) and BA posterior probabilities (PP). An asterisk (*) indicates 100% BS and 1.0 PP. The scale bar indicates branch length in substitutions per site.

Figure 1. Maximum-likelihood tree based on the concatenated nucleotide sequence of 13 protein-coding genes of Hygrobates (Hygrobates) longiporus (LC552026) and Hygrobates (Rivobates) taniguchii (LC552027), three further Hydrachnidia and four Trombiculoidea species. Accession numbers of the mitogenome sequences for each taxon used in the phylogenetic analysis are shown in parentheses. Nodal values are ML bootstrap support values (BS) and BA posterior probabilities (PP). An asterisk (*) indicates 100% BS and 1.0 PP. The scale bar indicates branch length in substitutions per site.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Data availability statement

The data that support the findings of this study are openly available in the National Center for Biotechnology Information database (NCBI/GenBank) at https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/, accession numbers LC552026 and LC552027.

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by JSPS KAKENHI [grant number 17K07271], [grant number 18K06392].

References

  • Bernt M, Donath A, Jühling F, Externbrink F, Florentz C, Fritzsch G, Pütz J, Middendorf M, Stadler PF. 2013. MITOS: improved de novo metazoan mitochondrial genome annotation. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 69(2):313–319.
  • Blattner L, Gerecke R, von Fumetti S. 2019. Hidden biodiversity revealed by integrated morphology and genetic species delimitation of spring dwelling water mite species (Acari, Parasitengona: Hydrachnidia). Parasit Vectors. 12(1):492.
  • Dabert M, Proctor H, Dabert J. 2016. Higher-level molecular phylogeny of the water mites (Acariformes: Prostigmata: Parasitengonina: Hydrachnidiae). Mol Phylogenet Evol. 101:75–90.
  • Di Sabatino A, Smit H, Gerecke R, Goldschmidt T, Matsumoto N, Cicolani B. 2008. Global diversity of water mites (Acari, Hydrachnidia; Arachnida) in freshwater. Hydrobiologia. 595(1):303–315.
  • Goldschmidt T, Nishikawa K, Hiruta SF, Shimano S. 2020. Description of three new water mite species of Hygrobates Koch, 1837 (Lurchibates Goldschmidt & Fu, 2011) (Acari. Hydrachnidia, Hygrobatidae), Parasitic in Newts of the Genera Paramesotriton and Pachytriton (Amphibia, Caudata, Salamandridae) from China. Zootaxa. 4768(1):25–42.
  • Goldschmidt T. 2016. Water mites (Acari, Hydrachnidia): powerful but widely neglected bioindicators–a review. Neotrop Biodiv. 2(1):12–25.
  • Kozlov A, Darriba D, Flouri T, Morel B, Stamatakis A. 2019. RAxML-NG: A fast, scalable and user-friendly tool for maximum likelihood phylogenetic inference. Bioinformatics. 35(21):4453–4455.
  • Martin P, Dabert M, Dabert J. 2010. Molecular evidence for species separation in the water mite Hygrobates nigromaculatus Lebert, 1879 (Acari, Hydrachnidia): evolutionary consequences of the loss of larval parasitism. Aquat Sci. 72(3):347–360.
  • Pešić V, Asadi M, Cimpean M, Dabert M, Esen Y, Gerecke R, Martin P, Savić A, Smit H, Stur E. 2017. Six species in one: evidence of cryptic speciation in the Hygrobates fluviatilis complex (Acariformes, Hydrachnidia, Hygrobatidae). SAA. 22(9):1327–1377.
  • Pešić V, Saboori A, Zawal A, Dabert M. 2019. Hidden but not enough: DNA barcodes reveal two new species in Hygrobates fluviatilis complex from Iran (Acariformes, Hydrachnidia, Hygrobatidae). Syst App Acarol. 24(10):2439–2459.
  • Pešić V, Smit H. 2016. Evidence of cryptic and pseudocryptic speciation in Brachypodopsis baumi species complex (Acari, Hydrachnidia, Aturidae) from Borneo, with description of three new species. Syst App Acarol. 21(8):1092–1106.
  • Pešić V, Smit H. 2017. Neumania kyrgyzica sp. nov. a new water mite from Kyrgyzstan based on morphological and molecular data (Acari, Hydrachnidia: Unionicolidae). SAA. 22(6):885–894.
  • Pešić V, Smit H. 2018. A second Palaearctic species of the genus Wettina Piersig, 1892 based on morphological and molecular data (Acari, Hydrachnidia: Wettinidae). Syst App Acarol. 23(4):724–732.
  • Ronquist F, Teslenko M, Van Der Mark P, Ayres DL, Darling A, Höhna S, Larget B, Liu L, Suchard MA, Huelsenbeck JP. 2012. MrBayes 3.2: efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Syst Biol. 61(3):539–542.
  • Smit H. In press. Water mites of the world, with keys to the families, subfamilies, genera and subgenera (Acari: Hydrachnidia). Dutch Entomological Society, Amsterdam, Netherlands.