652
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Mitogenome Announcement

The complete chloroplast genome of Phellodendron chinense (Rutaceae), an Endangered medicinal plant in southern China

, &
Pages 3768-3770 | Received 27 Aug 2020, Accepted 06 Oct 2020, Published online: 20 Nov 2020

Abstract

Phellodendron chinense is an Endangered medicinal plant in southern China. In this study, the complete chloroplast genome sequence of P.chinense was characterized by de novo assembly. The length of the whole chloroplast genome was 158,537 bp, containing a large single copy region (LSC) of 86,250 bp and a small single copy region (SSC) of 18,287 bp, which were separated by a pair of 27,000 bp inverted repeat regions (IRs). The sequence contains 114 unique genes, including 30 tRNA, 4 rRNA, and 80 protein-coding genes. The overall GC content of the chloroplast genome is 38.4% and those in the LSC, SSC, and IR regions are 36.6, 33.2, and 42.9%, respectively. The phylogenetic analysis based on reported chloroplast sequences of Rutaceae showed that P. chinense is sister to P. amurense, consisting a monophyletic group, and that Phellodendron is closely related to Zanthoxylum.

Phellodendron is a small genus of aromatic deciduous trees in family Rutaceae distributed in eastern Asia. It consists of two recognized species, P. chinense Schneid. and P. amurense Rupr. (Ma et al. Citation2006). Phellodendron chinense is endemic to Anhui, Hubei, Hunan, Sichuan and Yunnan provinces, southern China, scattering in subtropical broad-leaved forests or mixed forests (Zhang et al. Citation2019). This species is best known for its bark (cortex) which was used as one of the most famous Chinese traditional medicines (Tang et al. Citation2016). Due to its high medicinal value, it was listed as one of the 237 species of national Endangered and key protected wild plants in China (Yu Citation1999). In the past decades, wild populations of P. chinense have declined significantly, suggesting that urgent conservation measures need to be taken (Shen et al. Citation2009; Tang et al. Citation2016; Zhang et al. Citation2019). In this study, we assembled the complete chloroplast genome of P. chinense using next-generation sequencing to provide a gene source for further genetic and conservation studies.

Fresh young leaves of P. chinense were collected from Tianquan County, Sichuan Province, China (N 29°59′19.61ʺ, E 102°38′34.13″). Voucher specimen (collection numbers: BJFUZLC061) was deposited in the Herbarium of Beijing Forestry University (BJFC). The total genome DNA was extracted using a modified protocol (Chen et al. Citation2014) and sent to Majorbio (http://www.majorbio.com, China) for next-generation sequencing using Illumina Hiseq Xten. About 2.5 Gb high quality, 2 × 150 bp pair-end reads were obtained from High-throughput sequencing. The chloroplast genome of P. amurense (Genbank accession no. KY707335.1) was used as a reference to exclude nuclear and mitochondrial reads by Geneious Prime 2020.2 (Kearse et al. Citation2012). Filtered chloroplast reads were exploited for de novo assembly with Geneious Prime. The assembled chloroplast sequences of P. chinense were then annotated using Plann (Huang and Cronk Citation2015) by referring to the relative group.

The complete chloroplast genome of P. chinense (Genbank accession no. MT916287) was a circular molecule with a size of 1,58,537 bp in length, comprising a large single copy (LSC) region of 86,250 bp and a small single copy (SSC) region of 18,287 bp, which were separated by a pair of 27,000 bp inverted repeat (IR) regions. The chloroplast genome sequence contains unique 114 genes. Among them, there are 80 protein-coding genes, 30 tRNA genes and 4 rRNA genes. Most of the genes occurred in the single-copy region, with 4 rRNA genes (rrn16, rrn4.5, rrn23, and rrn5), 7 tRNA genes (trnI-CAU, trnL-CAA, trnV-GAC, trnI-GAU, trnA-UGC, trnR-ACG, and trnN-GUU) and 8 protein-coding genes (rpl2, rpl22, rpl23, rps7, ycf15, ycf2, ndhB, and rps12) replicating in the IR region. Among these genes, 16 genes (rpl2, rpl16, rps12, rps16, ndhB, ndhA, atpF, rpoC1, petB, petD, trnI-GAU, trnK-UUU, trnG-UCC, trnL-UAA, trnV-UAC, and trnA-UGC) had one intron, 2 genes (ycf3 and clpP) contained 2 introns. The overall GC content of the chloroplast genome is 38.4% and those in the LSC, SSC, and IR regions are 36.6, 33.2, and 42.9%, respectively.

In order to understand the phylogenetic status of P. chinense within Rutaceae, a phylogenetic analysis was performed based on complete chloroplast genome sequences of 18 other species of the family. These sequences were obtained from NCBI and Canarium album (Burseraceae) was used as the outgroup. All sequences were aligned, and a phylogenetic tree was constructed using the maximum likelihood method by MAGE-X (Kumar et al. Citation2018; Katoh et al. Citation2019). Bootstraps were calculated for 1000 replicates to comfirm the bootstrap value of each node, and the Tamura-Ne model operation was selected to obtain the tree (). The phylogenetic results showed that P. chinense is sister to P. amurense, consisting a monophyletic group. Then Phellodendron is closely related to Zanthoxylum, which is consistent with the phylogenetic relationship between the two genera based on plastid and nuclear markers (Poon et al. Citation2007; Appelhans et al. Citation2018).

Figure 1. Maximum likelihood tree of 19 Rutaceae species based on the complete plastid genome sequences. The number associated with the nodes are the bootstrap values.

Figure 1. Maximum likelihood tree of 19 Rutaceae species based on the complete plastid genome sequences. The number associated with the nodes are the bootstrap values.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Data availability statement

The data that support the findings of this study are openly available in GenBank of NCBI at https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov, reference number MT916287.

Additional information

Funding

This study was funded by Beijing Forestry University “National Undergraduate Training Programs for Innovation and Entrepreneurship” [G201910022070] and Science & Technology Basic Resources Investigation Program of China [2017FY100100].

References

  • Appelhans MS, Reichelt N, Groppo M, Paetzold C, Wen J. 2018. Phylogeny and biogeography of the pantropical genus Zanthoxylum and its closest relatives in the proto-Rutaceae group (Rutaceae). Mol Phylogenet Evol. 126:31–44.
  • Chen LY, Song MS, Zha HG, Li ZM. 2014. A modified protocol for plant genome DNA extraction. Plant Diversity Resour. 36:375–380.
  • Huang DI, Cronk QC. 2015. Plann: a command-line application for annotating plastome sequences. Appl Pl Sci. 3(8):1500026.
  • Katoh K, Rozewicki J, Yamada KD. 2019. MAFFT online service: multiple sequence alignment, interactive sequence choice and visualization. Brief Bioinform. 20(4):1160–1166.
  • Kearse M, Moir R, Wilson A, Stones-Havas S, Cheung M, Sturrock S, Buxton S, Cooper A, Markowitz S, Duran C, et al. 2012. Geneious Basic: an integrated and extendable desktop software platform for the organization and analysis of sequence data. Bioinformatics. 28(12):1647–1649.
  • Kumar S, Stecher G, Li M, Knyaz C, Tamura K. 2018. MEGA X: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis across computing platforms. Mol Biol Evol. 35(6):1547–1549.
  • Ma JS, Cao W, Liu QR, Yu M, Han LJ. 2006. A revision of Phellodendron (Rutaceae). Edinb J Bot. 63(2–3):131–151.
  • Poon WS, Shaw PS, Simmons MP, But PH. 2007. Congruence of molecular, morphological, and biochemical profifiles in Rutaceae: a cladistic analysis of the subfamilies. Syst Bot. 32(4):837–846.
  • Shen L, Fu SZ, Ma L, Chen XL, Yi DY. 2009. Investigation on the wild resources of cortex Phellodendron chinense. Chinese Wild Plant Resour. 28(4):25–28.
  • Tang ZY, Qiao L, Ruan ZY, Bai B. 2016. Research advances on Phellodendron chinense Schenid. Chinese Agric Sci Bullet. 32(02):82–86.
  • Yu YF. 1999. The national key protected wild plants in China. Plants. (5):3–11.
  • Zhang ZP, Wang XY, Zhang Z, Yao H, Zhang XM, Zhang Y, Zhang BG. 2019. The impact of genetic diversity on the accuracy of DNA barcoding to identify species: a study on the genus Phellodendron. Ecol Evol. 9(18):10723–10711.