524
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Mitogenome Announcement

The complete chloroplast genome of Humulus lupulus cv. ‘Fubei-1’ (Rosales: Cannabaceae)

, , , , , & show all
Pages 2439-2441 | Received 31 Dec 2020, Accepted 02 May 2021, Published online: 20 Jul 2021

Abstract

Hop (Humulus lupulus) is a perennial plant with commercial values. Here, we reported the complete chloroplast genome for a local hop cultivar (Humulus lupulus cv. ‘Fubei-1’) from Xinjiang, China. The chloroplast genome is 153,614 bp long with an A + T-biased base composition, and contains a total of 113 gene species, including 79 protein-coding, 30 tRNA, and four rRNA gene species. Nineteen gene species are duplicated, and 18 gene species harbor one or two introns. Phylogenetic analysis revealed close relatedness among the three hop cultivars (‘Saazer’, ‘Hallertauer’, and ‘Fubei-1’).

Hop (Humulus lupulus) is a perennial dioecious plant within the family Cannabaceae (order Rosales), and is widely distributed in Africa, North America, Europe, and Asia (including China’s Gansu, Sichuan, and Xinjiang Provinces) (Zhou and Bartholomew Citation2003). This plant has a long history of cultivation for beer brewing, and many cultivars have been developed across its geographic ranges (Hadonou et al. Citation2004; Almaguer et al. Citation2014; Vergara et al. Citation2016). Recently, chloroplast DNA has proven effective for cultivar identification in many plant species (Intrieri et al. Citation2007; Enan and Ahmed Citation2016; Jena et al. Citation2019). To date, chloroplast genomes have been sequenced for only a couple of hop cultivars, i.e. Humulus lupulus cv. ‘Saazer’ (NC_028032; Vergara et al. Citation2016) and Humulus lupulus cv. ‘Hallertauer’ (MG573060; Islam and Hamme, unpublished). In the present study, we assembled the complete chloroplast genome for a local hop cultivar (Humulus lupulus cv. ‘Fubei-1’) from Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, China, and further investigated its relationship with other taxa within the family Cannabaceae.

Fresh leaves of a single individual were collected from Altay City, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, China (88.2207°E, 48.009°N). A voucher specimen (no. 654301170808030LY) was deposited at the Herbarium of the Xinjiang Institute of Chinese Materia Medica and Ethnical Materia Medica. The genomic DNA was extracted using the DNeasy Plant Mini Kit (QIAGEN, Valencia, CA) following the manufacturer’s instructions, and stored at −80 °C for further analysis. The quantity and quality of extracted DNA were determined using a NanoDrop ND-1000 Spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA) and agarose gel electrophoresis, respectively.

A total amount of 0.5 μg DNA was used for the DNA sequencing library preparation with TruSeq Nano DNA HT Sample Prep Kit (Illumina, San Diego, CA) following the manufacturer’s protocol. Briefly, genomic DNA sample was fragmented by sonication to a size of 350 bp. Then, DNA fragments were endpolished, A-tailed, and ligated with the full-length adapter for Illumina sequencing, followed by further PCR amplification. After that, the library was analyzed for size distribution with Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA) and quantified by real-time PCR. The clustering of the index-coded samples was performed on a cBot Cluster Generation System using HiSeq X PE Cluster Kit V2.5 (Illumina, San Diego, CA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. After cluster generation, amplicons were pooled in equal amounts, and paired-end 2–150 bp sequencing was performed using the Illumina HiSeq X Ten platform at Xuan Chen Biological Technology Co., Ltd. (Shaanxi, China).

The genome sequence data that support the findings of this study are openly available in GenBank of NCBI at https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ under the accession no. PRJNA715949. The associated BioProject, SRA, and Bio-Sample numbers are PRJN 715949, SUB9201162, and SAMN18388804, respectively.

After quality-trimming with CLC Genomics Workbench v10 (CLC Bio, Aarhus, Denmark), the raw sequencing reads were used to assemble the chloroplast genome with MITObim v1.9 (Hahn et al. Citation2013). The chloroplast genome of Humulus yunnanensis (MK423880) (Ling and Zhang Citation2019) was selected as the initial reference. Genome annotation was conducted in GENEIOUS R11.0.2 (Biomatters Ltd., Auckland, New Zealand) by aligning those of phylogenetically related species.

The chloroplast genome of H. lupulus cv. ‘Fubei-1’ was determined to be 153,614 bp long with a typical A + T-biased base composition (31.1% A, 18.8% C, 18.1% G, and 32.0% T). A set of 113 gene species were annotated, including 79 protein-coding, 30 tRNA genes, and four rRNA gene species. Gene duplication occurs in 19 of these gene species (ndhB, rpl2, rpl23, rps7, rps12, rps19, ycf1, ycf2, trnA-UGC, trnI-CAU, trnI-GAU, trnL-CAA, trnN-GUU, trnR-ACG, trnV-GAC, rrn4.5, rrn5, rrn16, and rrn23). In addition, 16 gene species (atpF, ndhA, ndhB, petB, petD, rpl2, rpl16, rpoC1, rps12, rps16, trnA-UGC, trnG-UCC, trnI-GAU, trnK-UUU, trnL-UAA, and trnV-UAC) harbored a single intron and two gene species (clpP and ycf3) harbored two introns.

To ascertain its relationship to those confamilial taxa, phylogenetic analysis was conducted based on the Bayesian analysis of chloroplast protein-coding genes for a panel of 17 taxa within the family Cannabaceae (). Three taxa from the family Moraceae (i.e. Broussonetia papyrifera, Ficus altissima, and Morus cathayana) were included as outgroup taxa. DNA alignment was conducted in Geneious R11 (Biomatters, Co. Ltd., Auckland, New Zealand), and was then imported into TOPALi v2.5 (Milne et al. Citation2009) for the phylogenetic analysis with the implemented MrBayes v3.1.1 program (Ronquist and Huelsenbeck Citation2003) under the best-fit nucleotide substitution model ‘GTR + G+I’. As expected, the phylogenetic analysis indicates that the three hop cultivars (‘Saazer’, ‘Hallertauer’, and ‘Fubei-1’) are most closely related to one another than to the other congeneric or confamilial taxa.

Figure 1. Phylogeny of 17 taxa within the family Cannabaceae based on the Bayesian analysis of chloroplast protein-coding genes. The best-fit nucleotide substitution model is ‘GTR + G+I’. The support values were placed next to the nodes. Three taxa within the family Moraceae (i.e. Broussonetia papyrifera, Ficus altissima, and Morus cathayana) were included as outgroup taxa.

Figure 1. Phylogeny of 17 taxa within the family Cannabaceae based on the Bayesian analysis of chloroplast protein-coding genes. The best-fit nucleotide substitution model is ‘GTR + G+I’. The support values were placed next to the nodes. Three taxa within the family Moraceae (i.e. Broussonetia papyrifera, Ficus altissima, and Morus cathayana) were included as outgroup taxa.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Data availability statement

The data that support the findings of this study are openly available in GenBank from NCBI at https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov under the accession number MW387998.

Additional information

Funding

This work was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China [U160320065].

References

  • Almaguer C, Schönberger C, Gastl M, Arendt EK, Becker T. 2014. Humulus lupulus – a story that begs to be told. A review. J Inst Brew. 120(4):289–314.
  • Enan MR, Ahmed A. 2016. Cultivar-level phylogeny using chloroplast DNA barcode psbK-psbI spacers for identification of Emirati date palm (Phoenix dactylifera L.) varieties. Genet Mol Res. 15(3).
  • Hadonou AM, Walden R, Darby P. 2004. Isolation and characterization of polymorphic microsatellites for assessment of genetic variation of hops (Humulus lupulus L.). Mol Ecol Notes. 4(2):280–282.
  • Hahn C, Bachmann L, Chevreux B. 2013. Reconstructing mitochondrial genomes directly from genomic next-generation sequencing reads—a baiting and iterative mapping approach. Nucleic Acids Res. 41(13):e129.
  • Intrieri MC, Muleo R, Buiatti M. 2007. Chloroplast DNA polymorphisms as molecular markers to identify cultivars of Olea europaea L. J Horticult Sci Biotechnol. 82(1):109–113.
  • Jena B, Giri AK, Biswal B, Acharya L, Panda MK. 2019. Cultivar identification in Tabernaemontana divaricata (L.) R. Br. ex Roem. & Schult. using universal barcode markers. Gene Rep. 17:100467.
  • Ling L-Z, Zhang S-D. 2019. The complete chloroplast genome of Humulus yunnanensis and phylogenetic analysis of the genus Humulus. Mitochondrial DNA Part B. 4(2):2681–2682.
  • Milne I, Lindner D, Bayer M, Husmeier D, McGuire G, Marshall DF, Wright F. 2009. TOPALi v2: a rich graphical interface for evolutionary analyses of multiple alignments on HPC clusters and multi-core desktops. Bioinformatics. 25(1):126–127.
  • Ronquist F, Huelsenbeck JP. 2003. MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics. 19(12):1572–1574.
  • Vergara D, White KH, Keepers KG, Kane NC. 2016. The complete chloroplast genomes of Cannabis sativa and Humulus lupulus. Mitochondrial DNA Part A. 27(5):3793–3794.
  • Zhou Z-K, Bartholomew B. 2003. Cannabaceae. J Chin Integr Med. 1(1):74–75.