837
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Mitogenome Announcement

Characterization of the complete chloroplast genome of Hordeum jubatum (Poaceae: Pooideae: Triticeae) and phylogenetic analysis

, , , , ORCID Icon, & show all
Pages 2933-2935 | Received 18 Jun 2021, Accepted 22 Aug 2021, Published online: 15 Sep 2021

Abstract

Hordeum jubatum is a salt tolerant forage, which plays an important role in improving saline-alkali land and animal husbandry alkali-saline grassland. Hordeum jubatum has been gradually domesticated as an ornamental grass due to its special flower color. However, no domesticated varieties of H. jubatum plant have been reported worldwide. This study reported the complete chloroplast genome of wild H. jubatum, which was 136,871 bp in length, containing a pair of inverted repeats (IRA/IRB) of 21,608 bp separated by a small single-copy (SSC) area region of 12,799 bp and the large single-copy (LSC) region of 80,856 bp. A total of 133 genes, including 85 protein-coding genes (79 PCG species), 40 transfer RNA genes (32 tRNA species), and eight ribosomal RNA genes (four rRNA species) were predicted from the chloroplast genomes. The overall GC content was 38.25%, and the corresponding values of the LSC, SSC, and IR were 36.22%, 32.15%, and 43.85%, respectively. The phylogenetic analysis showed that wild H. jubatum was clustered closely with Hordeum bogdanii.

Hordeum jubatum L. commonly known as foxtail barley is a perennial herb that belongs to the genus Hordeum of Poaceae. It has tufted, smooth and glabrous culms, up to 45 cm height; flat, rough leaves, soft green or slightly purplish spikes, short stiff cilia on the edges; and usually degenerate to awn like florets which are rarely male (Best et al. Citation1978). The foxtail barley is distributed in Hei Longjiang, Jilin, Liaoning, Inner Mongolia, Gansu, Shandong, northern farming pastoral ecotone, and other provinces and regions (Chao et al. Citation2016). It has a strong re-productive, adaptive and competitive ability to easily establish, extend and naturalize on a new habitat to develop as a kind of invasive plant. Hordeum jubatum has a wide range of adaptability and strong resistance to salt and alkali, and it can tolerate soil pH range from 6.4 to 9.5 (Chao et al. Citation2016). It can also tolerate 0.3–0.9% soil salt level and survive for several weeks under the condition of 1.5% sodium chloride (Badger and Ungar Citation1990; Israelsen et al. Citation2011). It became a dominant plant in many types of grassland, especially in saline alkali grassland (Orton Citation1980; Badger and Ungar Citation1990).

Hordeum jubatum begins its reproductive growth in early May in spring, exhibiting pink green and sometimes reddish spikelets (Rick Citation1999). Spikelets and rachises turn golden yellow when they mature (June–August), where the awns and glumes have beautiful posture (Rick Citation1999; Jonathan et al. Citation2012). Wild H. jubatum is often planted as an ornamental plant for landscaping and garden greening (Tong and Liang Citation2014). Chloroplast genome as independent units of heredity has been widely applied to understand plant molecular systematics and trace the origin of species and their migration (Clegg et al. Citation1994; Wolfe and Randle Citation2004; Cheon et al. Citation2017). In this study, the complete chloroplast genome sequence of wild H. jubatum was assembled and analyzed by NovoPlasty software (version: 3.6; parameter: k-mer = 39) (Nicolas et al. Citation2016).

Fresh leaves of wild H. jubatum were collected from grassland in Huang Chen region of Su Nan Yugu Autonomous County, southern Gansu province, China (37°54′24″N, 101°48′30″E). Genomic DNA extraction and sequencing library construction were conducted by Benagen Technology Services Limited (Wuhan, China), while qualified library (NEBNext® Ultra™ II DNA Library Prep Kit for Illumina®) sequencing was conducted on an Illumina NovaSeq platform. Original data were filtered to get clean reads using the SOAPnuke software (version: 2.1.0). The clean reads were assembled into a complete chloroplast genome by using NovoPlasty software (version: 3.6; parameter: k-mer = 39) (Nicolas et al. Citation2016). Genomic alignment between the sample genome and close-related genome was performed using the BLAST tool (version: BLAST 2.9.0+; parameter: e-value 1e–5) (Kent Citation2002), and the assembled chloroplast of sample genome was annotated using GeSeq software (Michael et al. Citation2017). The phylogenetic tree was constructed by the maximum-likelihood method to determine the phylogenetic position of wild H. jubatum based on its complete chloroplast genome.

The chloroplast sequence of wild H. jubatum was 136,871 bp, including the large single copy region (LSC) of 80,856 bp and a small single-copy region (SSC) of 12,799 bp, and a pair of 21,608 bp inverted repeat regions (IRA/IRB). The nucleotide composition was asymmetric (30.56% A, 19.29% G, 18.96% C, and 31.18% T) with an overall GC content of 38.25%, including 36.22% in LSC region, 32.15% in SSC region, and 43.85% in IR region. It contained 133 functional genes, including 85 protein-coding genes (79 PCG species), 40 transfer RNA genes (32 tRNA species), and eight ribosomal RNA genes (four rRNA species). Among them trnK-UUU, rps16, trnG-UCC, atpF, trnL-UAA, trnI-GAU, trnV-UAC, trnA-UGC, rpl2, ndhA, ndhB, rps12, trnI-GAU, trnA-UGC, rps12, ndhB, rp12 contain a single intron, and ycf3 contains two introns. Most gene species occurred in a single copy. However, 19 gene species occurred in double copies, including seven PCG genes (rps7, rps12, rps15, rps19, rpl2, rpl23, and ndhB), eight tRNA genes (trnN-GUU, trnR-ACG, trnA-UGC, trnl-GAU, trnV-GAC, trnL-CAA, trnl-CAU, trnH-GUG), and four rRNA genes (rrn4.5, rrn5, rrn16, and rrn23).

The phylogenetic relationships were determined with the complete chloroplast genome of wild H. jubatum and other 23 grass species (Poaceae) available from the National Center of Biotechnology Information (NCBI) database. Phylogenetic analysis showed that the 24 species were clustered into two main clades, with H. bogdanii close relative to wild H. jubatum (). This complete chloroplast genome of wild H. jubatum provides relevant data to allow a robust phylogenetic analysis within the polyploidy genus Hordeum.

Figure 1. Maximum-likelihood tree of Hordeum jubatum plus 23 other grass species (Poaceae) based on their chloroplast genome sequences. Bootstrap support values (based on 1000 replicates) are shown next to the nodes.

Figure 1. Maximum-likelihood tree of Hordeum jubatum plus 23 other grass species (Poaceae) based on their chloroplast genome sequences. Bootstrap support values (based on 1000 replicates) are shown next to the nodes.

Disclosure statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of this article.

Data availability statement

A plant and DNA specimens were deposited at State Key Laboratory of Grassland Agro-ecosystems, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China (http://sklgae.lzu.edu.cn/index.jsp; contact person: Zhenjiang, Chen, and email: [email protected]) under the voucher number SKLGAE-SN-PHJ0107 and SKLGAE-SN-DHJ0107. The Hordeum jubatum data have been stored in nucleotide data-base of National Center of Biotechnology Information. GenBank accession number is MZ397993 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/MZ397993). Associated BioProject is PRJNA738268 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/biopro-ject/PRJNA738268). BioSample accession number at https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/biosample/SAMN19717117 and Sequence Read Archive at https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra/SRR14826256.

Additional information

Funding

This research was supported by the National Basic Research Program of China (2014CB138702), the Second Tibetan Plateau Scientific Expedition and Research (ST EP) program (2019QZKK0302), Program for Changjiang Scholars and Innovative Research Team in University, China (IRT17R50), Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (LZUJBKY- 2020-it11) and 111 Project (B12002). The authors are thankful for support from USDA-NIFA Multistate Project W4147, and the New Jersey Agricultural Experiment Station.

References

  • Badger KS, Ungar IA. 1990. Effects of soil salinity on growth and ion content of the inland halophyte Hordeum jubatum. Bot Gaz. 151(3):314–321.
  • Best KF, Banting JD, Bowes GG. 1978. The biology of Canadian weeds.: 31. Hordeum jubatum L. Can J Plant Sci. 58(3):187–190.
  • Chao C, Zhang WH, Wu JY, Da NT. 2016. Invasion characters and risk assessment of foxtail barley (Hordeum jubatum L.). Biol Disaster Sci. 39(2):130–135.
  • Cheon KS, Kim KA, Yoo KO. 2017. The complete chloroplast genome sequences of three Adenophora species and comparative analysis with Campanuloid species (Campanulaceae). PLOS One. 12(8):e0183652.
  • Clegg MT, Gaut BS, Learn GH, Morton ABR. 1994. Rates and patterns of chloroplast DNA evolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 91(15):6795–6801.
  • Israelsen KR, Ransom CV, Waldron BL. 2011. Salinity tolerance of foxtail barley (Hordeum jubatum) and desirable pasture grasses. Weed Sci. 59(4):500–505.
  • Jonathan B, Sabine SJ, Frank RB. 2012. Progenitor-derivative relationships of Hordeum polyploids (Poaceae, Triticeae) inferred from sequences of TOPO6, a nuclear low-copy gene region. PLOS One. 7(3):1–13.
  • Kent WJ. 2002. Blat-the BLAST-like alignment tool. Genome Res. 12(4):656–664.
  • Michael T, Pascal L, Tommaso P, Ulbricht-Jones ES, Axel F, Ralph B, Stephan G. 2017. GeSeq- versatile and accurate annotation of organelle genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 45(W1):W6–W11.
  • Nicolas D, Patrick M, Guillaume S. 2016. NOVOPlasty: de novo assembly of organelle genomes from whole genome data. Nucleic Acids Res. 4:4–13.
  • Orton TJ. 1980. Comparison of salt tolerance between Hordeum vulgare and H. jubatum in whole plants and callus cultures. Zeitschrift Für Pflanzenphysiol. 98(2):105–118.
  • Rick D. 1999. The color encyclopedia of ornamental grasses. Oregon: Timber Press; p. 207–208.
  • Tong B, Liang M. 2014. The optimization of Hordeum jubatum cultivation research. Territory Nat Resour Study. 3:89–90.
  • Wolfe A, Randle C. 2004. Recombination, heteroplasmy, haplotype polymorphism, and paralogy in plastid genes: implications for plant molecular systematics. Syst Bot. 29(4):1011–1020.