541
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Mitogenome Announcement

Complete mitochondrial genome of the Woodland Brown, Lopinga achine Scopoli, 1763 (Nymphalidae: Satyrinae) and its phylogenetic analysis

, , , , & ORCID Icon
Pages 747-749 | Received 27 Jan 2022, Accepted 20 Apr 2022, Published online: 03 May 2022

Abstract

In this study, the complete mitochondrial genome (mitogenome) of the Woodland Brown, Lopinga achine Scopoli, 1763 (Nymphalidae: Satyrinae) was determined to be 15,284 bp in size, including 37 typical mitochondrial genes and a control region. The gene content and arrangement of the mitogenome are identical to that of the majority of other sequenced nymphalids. All protein-coding genes (PCGs) are started with the conventional ATN codons, except for cox1 gene which is initiated by atypical CGA(R) codon. Nine PCGs use a typical stop codon of TAA, whereas the remaining PCGs (cox1, cox2, nad4, nad5) end with an incomplete T. The length of rrnL and rrnS are 1333 and 755 bp, respectively, separated by trnV. The phylogenetic tree inferred with Bayesian inference method reveals the phylogenetic relationships among the four tribes of Satyrinae analyzed as ((Satyrini + Melanitini) + (Elymniini + Amathusiini)). The newly sequenced species L. achine was clustered together with other two species of Parargina and formed a sister group with two species of the genus Lethe within Satyrini.

The subfamily Satyrinae is one of the most diverse butterfly groups of Nymphalidae with about 2,500 species distributed on all continents except Antarctica (Ackery et al. Citation1999; Peña and Wahlberg Citation2008). Owing to its high diversity, many Satyrinae species have been intensely investigated as model organisms in various research fields such as ecology (Schmitt and Haubrich Citation2008), developmental biology (Oliver et al. Citation2012), and conservation biology (Slamova et al. Citation2013). Regarding the classifications of Satyrinae, nine tribes and 16 subtribes have been defined (Marín et al. Citation2011). However, phylogeny among them remains largely unresolved (Yang and Zhang Citation2015; Yang et al. Citation2020; Sun et al. Citation2021). In recent decades, the insect mitochondrial genomes (mitogenomes) are being increasingly employed to explore the evolution and phylogenetic relationships in diverse insect taxa (Cameron Citation2014; Wu et al. Citation2014; Yang et al. Citation2020). Therefore, the complete mitogenome of the Woodland Brown, Lopinga achine Scopoli, 1763 (Nymphalidae: Satyrinae: Satyrini) was determined and analyzed in this study, which would be helpful to make the subdivision of Satyrinae clearer.

A specimen of L. achine was collected by Qinghui Shi from Minshan Mountain, Minxian County, Dingxi City, Gansu Province, China (34.433 N, 104.417 E) in June 2015. The fresh individual was preserved in absolute ethyl alcohol and deposited at the Medical Plant Exploitation and Utilization Engineering Research Center, Sanming University (Qinghui Shi, [email protected]) under the Voucher number SMU-20150627. Total genomic DNA was extracted and purified from thorax muscle of L. achine using the Rapid Animal Genomic DNA Isolation Kit (Sangon Biotech, Shanghai, China). One library (410 bp) was constructed, and an Illumina HiSeq platform was used for sequencing with the strategy of paired-end (Majorbio, Shanghai, China). Approximately 20,582,496 raw reads were obtained from L. achin mitogenome. Adapter sequences, low quality reads, reads with >10% of unknown bases, and ambiguous bases were removed to obtain high quality assembly. About 18,852,758 clean reads were gained and assembled by SOAPdenovo2 (Luo et al. Citation2012). The assembled mitogenome was annotated using the online DOGMA tool (http://dogma.ccbb.utexas.edu/) and further corrected manually. This study including the collection of sample was approved by the Scientific Research Administrative of Sanming University and complied with national and local legislation.

The complete mitogenome of L. achine is 15,284 bp in length (GenBank accession no. MT117843), consisting of 13 protein-coding genes (PCGs), 22 transfer RNA (tRNA) genes, 2 ribosomal RNA (rRNA) genes, and a control region. The gene content and arrangement of L. achine mitogenome are identical to other published Satyrinae mitogenomes (Chen et al. Citation2020; Sun et al. Citation2021). The overall GC content of the mitogenome is 20.5%, as the percentages of A, T, C, and G are 38.9%, 40.5%, 12.9%, and 7.6%, respectively. Additionally, 10 intergenic spacers (96 bp in total) and 13 overlapping regions (33 bp in total) are scattered throughout the whole mitogenome. Besides the control region, the largest noncoding region (60 bp in length) was located between gene trnQ and nad2. All PCGs are initiated by the typical codon of ATN, except for cox1 gene, which starts with the unusual CGA as found in most other determined Satyrinae mitogenomes (Shi et al. Citation2019; Yang et al. Citation2020). Nine PCGs use TAA as the termination codons, while four PCGs (cox1, cox2, nad5, nad4) stop with an incomplete T. The rrnL (1333 bp) and rrnS (755 bp) are separated by trnV.

To better understanding the phylogeny of Satyrinae, the phylogenetic tree was reconstructed based on concatenated nucleotide sequences of 13 PCGs and 2 rRNAs of L. achine and other 23 representative mitogenomes from Satyrinae and two outgroup species from Calinaginae and Charaxinae (). The 13 PCGs and 2 rRNAs were first aligned individually using MEGA7.0 software (Kumar et al. Citation2016), then concatenated using DAMBE7 (Xia Citation2018). The best model (GTR + I+ G) for concatenate sequences under the corrected Akaike Information Criterion using jModeltest 2.1.10 (Darriba et al. Citation2012) was selected. The Bayesian inference (BI) analysis was performed using MrBayes 3.2 (Ronquist et al. Citation2012), then four simultaneous Markov chains ran for 2 million generations and trees were sampled every 100 generations, with a burn-in of 25%. The BI analysis recovers the phylogenetic relationships among the four tribes of Satyrinae analyzed as ((Satyrini + Melanitini) + (Elymniini + Amathusiini)), which is identical to that of Yang et al. (Citation2020), but showing difference with that of other studies (Yang and Zhang Citation2015; Sun et al. Citation2021). The newly sequenced species L. achine clustered together with other two species of Parargina and formed a sister group with two species of the genus Lethe within Satyrini. Nevertheless, it should be noted that only eight of the 13 subtribes of Satyrini are analyzed in this study, and further effort is needed to improve the understanding of the whole Satyrini phylogeny based on mitogenome sequences of increased sampling.

Figure 1. The Bayesian inference (BI) phylogenetic tree of Lopinga achine and other Nymphalidae butterflies. Phylogenetic reconstruction was done from a concatenated matrix of 13 protein-coding mitochondrial genes and 2 ribosomal RNA genes. The numbers beside the nodes correspond to the posterior probability values (* = 1.00). Alphanumeric terms indicate the GenBank accession numbers.

Figure 1. The Bayesian inference (BI) phylogenetic tree of Lopinga achine and other Nymphalidae butterflies. Phylogenetic reconstruction was done from a concatenated matrix of 13 protein-coding mitochondrial genes and 2 ribosomal RNA genes. The numbers beside the nodes correspond to the posterior probability values (* = 1.00). Alphanumeric terms indicate the GenBank accession numbers.

Author contributions

Jia-Ling Wu contributed significantly to analysis and manuscript preparation; Ting-Ting Bao performed the experiment and data analyses; Gang Sun and Yan Fang were involved in the revising paper critically for intellectual content; Ying Xiao collected the data; Qing-Hui Shi contributed to the conception and design of the study and the final approval of the version to be published; and that all authors agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Data availability statement

The genome sequence data that support the findings of this study are openly available in GenBank of NCBI at https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov, under the accession no. MT117843. The associated BioProject, SRA, and Bio-Sample numbers are PRJNA795845, SRR17761215, and SAMN24783966, respectively.

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by the Education Scientific Research Project for the Middle-age and Young Teachers of Fujian Province under Grant [JAT200634]; Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province under Grant [2021J011121, 2021J011113, 2020J01373]; and Sanming University Scientific Research Foundation for High-level Talent under Grant [18YG01, 18YG02]

References

  • Ackery PR, Jong R, Vane-Wright RI. 1999. The butterflies: Hedyloidea, Hesperioidea, and Papilionoidea. In: Kristensen NP, editor. Lepidoptera: moths and butterflies. 1. Evolution, systematics, and biogeography. Handbook of zoology. Vol. IV, part 35. New York: De Gruyter; p. 263–299.
  • Cameron SL. 2014. Insect mitochondrial genomics: implications for evolution and phylogeny. Annu Rev Entomol. 59(1):95–117.
  • Chen L, Wahlberg N, Liao CQ, Wang CB, Ma FZ, Huang GH. 2020. Fourteen complete mitochondrial genomes of butterflies from the genus Lethe (Lepidoptera, Nymphalidae, Satyrinae) with mitogenome-based phylogenetic analysis. Genomics. 112(6):4435–4441.
  • Darriba D, Taboada GL, Doallo R, Posada D. 2012. jModelTest 2: more models, new heuristics and parallel computing. Nat Methods. 9(8):772.
  • Kumar S, Stecher G, Tamura K. 2016. MEGA7: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol Bio Evol. 33(7):1870–1874.
  • Luo RB, Liu BH, Xie YL, Li ZY, Huang WH, Yuan JY, He GZ, Chen YX, Pan Q, Liu YJ, et al. 2012. SOAPdenovo2: an empirically improved memory-efficient short-read de novo assembler. Gigascience. 1(1):18.
  • Marín MA, Peña C, Freitas AVL, Wahlberg N, Uribe SI. 2011. From the phylogeny of the Satyrinae butterflies to the systematics of Euptychiina (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae): history, progress and prospects. Neotrop Entomol. 40(1):1–13.
  • Oliver JC, Tong XL, Gall LF, Piel WH, Monteiro A. 2012. A single origin for nymphalid butterfly eyespots followed by widespread loss of associated gene expression. PLoS Genet. 8(8):e1002893.
  • Peña C, Wahlberg N. 2008. Prehistorical climate change increased diversification of a group of butterflies. Biol Lett. 4(3):274–278.
  • Ronquist F, Teslenko M, van der Mark P, Ayres DL, Darling A, Höhna S, Larget B, Liu L, Suchard MA, Huelsenbeck JP. 2012. MrBayes 3.2: efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Syst Biol. 61(3):539–542.
  • Schmitt T, Haubrich K. 2008. The genetic structure of the mountain forest butterfly Erebia euryale unravels the late Pleistocene and postglacial history of the mountain coniferous forest biome in Europe. Mol Ecol. 17(9):2194–2207.
  • Shi QH, Lin XQ, Ye X, Xing JH, Dong GW. 2019. Characterization of the complete mitochondrial genome of Minois dryas (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae: Satyrinae) with phylogenetic analysis. Mitochondrial DNA B. 4(1):1447–1449.
  • Slamova I, Klecka J, Konvicka M. 2013. Woodland and grassland mosaic from a butterfly perspective: habitat use by Erebia aethiops (Lepidoptera: Satyridae). Insect Conserv Diver. 6(3):243–254.
  • Sun YX, Chen C, Geng XX, Li J. 2021. Complete mitochondrial genome of Lasiommata deidamia and its phylogenetic implication to subfamily Satyrinae (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae). Mitochondrial DNA B Resour. 6(10):2943–2945.
  • Wu LW, Lin LH, Lees DC, Hsu YF. 2014. Mitogenomic sequences effectively recover relationships within brush-footed butterflies (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae). BMC Genomics. 15(1):468.
  • Xia XH. 2018. DAMBE7: New and improved tools for data analysis in molecular biology and evolution. Mol Biol Evol. 35(6):1550–1552.
  • Yang MS, Song L, Zhou L, Shi YX, Song N, Zhang YL. 2020. Mitochondrial genomes of four satyrine butterflies and phylogenetic relationships of the family Nymphalidae (Lepidoptera: Papilionoidea). Int J Biol Macromol. 145:272–281.
  • Yang MS, Zhang YL. 2015. Phylogenetic utility of ribosomal genes for reconstructing the phylogeny of five Chinese satyrine tribes (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae). ZK. 488:105–120.