461
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Editorial

Taking steps to improve quality of life after cancer: the role of physical activity

Pages 261-262 | Received 25 Apr 2016, Accepted 26 May 2016, Published online: 09 Jun 2016

The past two decades have generated a convincing body of research describing the benefits of moderate–vigorous physical activity after a cancer diagnosis. Physical activity after a diagnosis of breast or colorectal cancer, in particular, is associated with a reduced risk of disease-specific mortality. A recent meta-analysis estimated these effects as a 28% risk reduction (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.60–0.85) for breast cancer mortality and a 39% risk reduction (95% CI: 0.40–0.92) for colorectal cancer mortality [Citation1]. Survival benefits of this magnitude are comparable with the reductions in disease-specific mortality attributed to chemotherapy [Citation2].

Post-diagnosis moderate–vigorous physical activity has been associated with diminished treatment side effects, especially fatigue, and enhanced quality of life [Citation3,Citation4]. Physical activity is also an effective strategy for attenuating the increased risk of comorbid chronic disease that cancer survivors face [Citation5]. The broad range of health benefits for cancer survivors associated with physical activity is widely acknowledged. Most government and nongovernment cancer agencies recommend that, barring some clinical precautions, cancer survivors should engage in the same levels of physical activity that are currently recommended for the general population, i.e. at least 30 min of moderate–vigorous physical activity on most days of the week (e.g. Ref. [Citation6,Citation7]).

Despite the compelling benefits associated with physical activity, few cancer survivors are sufficiently active. Various studies have estimated that 22–54% of breast cancer survivors [Citation8] and 26–52% of colorectal cancer survivors [Citation9] accumulate the recommended amount of physical activity each week. However, these estimates are derived from self-report measures, which tend to generate inflated estimates of physical activity among cancer survivors [Citation10]. More recent studies have used accelerometry to characterize the physical activity of cancer survivors.

Use of accelerometers to measure physical activity among cancer survivors has demonstrated the very small fraction of the day that is comprised of moderate–vigorous physical activity. Studies of breast cancer survivors have reported approximately 4% [Citation8] and 2% [Citation11] of accelerometer wear time (waking hours of the day) accounts for moderate–vigorous physical activity, while approximately 3% of colon cancer survivors’ time is spent in moderate–vigorous physical activity [Citation9]. Accelerometer studies have also highlighted the large volumes on time spent in sedentary behavior (sitting): between 56% [Citation8] and 78% [Citation11] of the day for breast cancer survivors and 61% of the day for colon cancer survivors [Citation9].

Changing cancer survivors’ physical activity levels is challenging. Behavioral interventions – delivered in person or via telephone or written materials – can achieve modest increases in moderate–vigorous physical activity; however, these are often short lived and diminish post-intervention [Citation12]. Most interventions delivered to cancer survivors focus on increasing moderate–vigorous aerobic activity [Citation13] although there is also a comprehensive body of literature pertaining to strength training, particularly among breast and prostate cancer survivors [Citation14]. Numerous studies examining the effects of yoga on health outcomes in cancer survivors have been conducted, with a systematic review and meta-analysis concluding that this mode of physical activity improves psychological health outcomes and reduces fatigue [Citation15]. Research focused on other components of the physical activity spectrum is emerging. For example, high-intensity interval training (HIIT) has been administered to cancer survivors with promising results [Citation16]. This type of exercise training has specific benefits for cardiorespiratory fitness and body composition, both of which are adversely affected by cancer therapies. Reducing sedentary behavior may be another strategy for improving health outcomes in cancer survivors. It has been suggested that targeting sedentary behavior may be a more feasible and appropriate approach for cancer survivors, including those for whom moderate–vigorous physical activity is contraindicated [Citation17].

It is important that future research continues to examine the potential benefits provided by physical activity across the full spectrum, from reducing sedentary behavior through to HIIT training. Such research will help guide health care providers to tailor advice about physical activity to their clients, according to their needs. The personal preferences of cancer survivors must also be taken into consideration when providing guidance in relation to becoming more physically active. Enabling cancer survivors to be actively involved in this element of their rehabilitation is essential for long-term maintenance of behavioral change. Finally, it has been highlighted by others that there is a role to be played by health care providers, family members, community-based organizations, and researchers in encouraging cancer survivors to initiate and maintain a physically active lifestyle, not just at the time of diagnosis, but across the cancer survivorship trajectory [Citation18].

In summary, regardless of how physical activity is assessed (by self-report or accelerometry), it is clear that cancer survivors do not engage sufficient levels to convey the full range of health benefits. There are many reasons why being physically active after a cancer diagnosis is a challenge, including common treatment side effects such as fatigue and hot flushes [Citation4]. However, conventional cancer treatments, such as chemotherapy and radiation therapy, are also uncomfortable and a challenge to adhere to [Citation19]. Physical activity is an important adjunct to conventional cancer therapy and is increasingly being recognized as an important part of a comprehensive cancer management strategy. Everyone involved in cancer control efforts should promote the potential benefits of a physically active lifestyle to cancer survivors.

Declaration of interest

BM Lynch was supported by a Fellowship from the National Breast Cancer Foundation (ECF-15-012). The authors have no other relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript apart from those disclosed.

References

  • Schmid D, Leitzmann MF. Association between physical activity and mortality among breast cancer and colorectal cancer survivors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Oncol. 2014;25(7):1293–1311.
  • Early Breast Cancer Trialists’ Collaborative Group (EBCTCG), Peto R, Davies C, et al. Comparisons between different polychemotherapy regimens for early breast cancer: meta-analyses of long-term outcome among 100,000 women in 123 randomised trials. Lancet. 2012;379(9814):432–444.
  • Mishra SI, Scherer RW, Snyder C, et al. Are exercise programs effective for improving health-related quality of life among cancer survivors? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2014;41(6):E326–E342.
  • Schmitz KH, Courneya KS, Matthews C, et al. American College of Sports Medicine roundtable on exercise guidelines for cancer survivors. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2010;42(7):1409–1426.
  • Hawkes AL, Lynch BM, Owen N, et al. Lifestyle factors associated concurrently and prospectively with co-morbid cardiovascular disease in a population-based cohort of colorectal cancer survivors. Eur J Cancer. 2011;47(2):267–276.
  • Rock CL, Doyle C, Demark-Wahnefried W, et al. Nutrition and physical activity guidelines for cancer survivors. CA Cancer J Clin. 2012;62(4):242–274.
  • Cancer Council Australia. Position statement – benefits of health diet and physical activity for cancer survivors [ cited 2016 Apr 25]. Available from: http://wiki.cancer.org.au/policy/Position_statement_-_Benefits_of_healthy_diet_and_physical_activity_for_cancer_survivors
  • Boyle T, Vallance JK, Ransom EK, et al. How sedentary and physically active are breast cancer survivors, and which population subgroups have higher or lower levels of these behaviors? Support Care Cancer. 2016;24:2181–2190.
  • Lynch BM, Boyle T, Winkler E, et al. Patterns and correlates of accelerometer-assessed physical activity and sedentary time among colon cancer survivors. Cancer Causes Control. 2016;27(1):59–68.
  • Boyle T, Lynch BM, Courneya KS, et al. Agreement between accelerometer-assessed and self-reported physical activity and sedentary time in colon cancer survivors. Support Care Cancer. 2015;23(4):1121–1126.
  • Sabiston CM, Brunet J, Vallance JK, et al. Prospective examination of objectively assessed physical activity and sedentary time after breast cancer treatment: sitting on the crest of the teachable moment. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2014;23(7):1324–1330.
  • Bourke L, Homer KE, Thaha MA, et al. Interventions to improve exercise behaviour in sedentary people living with and beyond cancer: a systematic review. Br J Cancer. 2014;110:831–841.
  • Fong DY, Ho JW, Hui BP, et al. Physical activity for cancer survivors: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ. 2012;344:e70.
  • Hanson ED, Wagoner CW, Anderson T, et al. The independent effects of strength training in cancer survivors: a systematic review. Curr Oncol Rep. 2016;18(5):31.
  • Buffart LM, Van Uffelen JG, Riphagen II, et al. Physical and psychosocial benefits of yoga in cancer patients and survivors, a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. BMC Cancer. 2012;12:559.
  • Devin JL, Sax AT, Hughes GI, et al. The influence of high-intensity compared with moderate-intensity exercise training on cardiorespiratory fitness and body composition in colorectal cancer survivors: a randomised controlled trial. J Cancer Surviv. 2016;10(3):467–479.
  • Lynch BM, Dunstan DW, Vallance JK, et al. Don’t take cancer sitting down: a new survivorship research agenda. Cancer. 2013;119(11):1928–1935.
  • Pinto BM, Demark-Wahnefried W, Rowland JH, et al. Accelerometer determined lifestyle behaviors over time-letter. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2014;23(11):2612.
  • Puts MT, Tu HA, Tourangeau A, et al. Factors influencing adherence to cancer treatment in older adults with cancer: a systematic review. Ann Oncol. 2014;25(3):564–577.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.