Abstract
As the direct responsible cadre in China’s local environmental management, the role of environmental protection bureau head (EPBH) is both critical and embarrassing. However, the profile of this group of cadres is largely unknown. This paper makes the first attempt to delineate China’s prefectural EPBHs and find several distinct features. First, although advocated by the central authority, “be younger” has not been realized in the appointment of EPBH. On the contrary, older candidates have been more favored in recent years. Second, EPBH is primarily a political actor rather than professional actor. However, they have been bearing increasing political pressure due to professional task. Third, county governments and other prefectural departments are the most important sources of EPBH, while for general environmental officials, it is very hard to be promoted as EPBH. Fourth, the promotion chance of EPBH is relatively high and most of them have been promoted to county governments and other prefectural departments. Last, the number of EPBHs removed because of dereliction has increased notably, but only a small fraction was sanctioned for poor and fraud environmental supervision. Finally, corresponding suggestions are proposed to optimize the selection, appointment, and management of EPBH.
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).
Notes
1 Hambrick and Mason, “Upper Echelons,” 193–206.
2 Kriger and Seng, “Leadership with Inner Meaning,” 771–806.
3 Colbert et al., “Assessing the Trait Theory of Leadership,” 670–685.
4 Borins, “Leadership and Innovation in the Public Sector,” 467–476; Gilley et al., “Organizational Change and Characteristics of Leadership Effectiveness,” 38–47.
5 Ames and Rosemont, The Analects of Confucius; de Jong, “The Pros and Cons of Confucian Values,” 13–24.
6 Brødsgaard, “Management of Party Cadres in China,” 390–420.
7 Wang, “Seeking Performance or Control,” 503–524.
8 Shih et al., “Getting Ahead in the Communist Party,” 166–187.
9 Smith, “Getting Ahead in Rural China,” 594–612.
10 Liu et al., “Promotion for Performance”.
11 Huang and Liu, “Fighting Corruption,” 47–49.
12 Liu et al., “Assessing the Administrative Practice of Environmental Protection Performance Evaluation in China,” 51–60.
13 Ran, “Understanding Blame Politics in China’s Decentralized System,” 634–661.
14 Wang, “How to be a Good EPBH?,” 56–58.
15 Lo et al., “Controlling Industrial Pollution in Urban China,” 232–258.
16 Three major problems need to be solved in vertical supervision. http://www.pecc.cc/index.php/t/23/170 (in Chinese).
17 Liu and Wang, “Does the ‘Chinese Model’ of Environmental Governance Demonstrate to the World how to Govern the Climate?”.
18 Cao, “Dialogue with Liu Yandong,” 16–17; Huai, “Grassroots Environmental Protection,” 26.
19 http://zqb.cyol.com/html/2015-01/21/nw.D110000zgqnb_20150121_1-12.htm (in Chinese); Chen et al., “Energy Productivity,” 103–112; see note 10.
20 Cao, “Dialogue with Liu Yandong,” 16–17; Wang, “Pressure and Puzzlement,” 32–34.
21 Kostka and Nahm, “Central–Local Relations,” 567–582; Ran, “Perverse Incentive Structure and Policy Implementation Gap,” 17–39.
22 Liu and de Jong, “The Institutional Causes of Environmental Protests in China,” 460–477.
23 Lieberthal,"China’s Governing System,” 3–8.
24 Kostka and Nahm, “Central–Local Relations,” 567–582; Zhang, “Implementation of Pollution Control Targets in China,” 749–774.
25 Ran, “Understanding Blame Politics in China’s Decentralized System,” 634–661; Zhang, “Implementation of Pollution Control Targets in China,” 749–774; Ahlers, “Political Inclusion in Contemporary China,” 201–206.
26 See notes 10 and 12.
27 Wong and Karplus, “China's War on Air Pollution,” 662–684.
28 Kostka and Nahm, “Central–Local Relations,” 567–582.
29 See note 28; Lin, “Enforcement of Pollution Levies in China,” 32–43.
30 See note 28, Zhang, “Implementation of Pollution Control Targets in China,” 749–774.
31 Mertha, “Stressing Out,” 64–85.
32 Chan, “Cadre personnel management in China” 703–734; Chan and Suizhou, “Civil Service Law in the People’s Republic of China” 383-398.
33 Chan and Gao, “The Politics of Personnel Redundancy,” 622–643.
34 Edin, “Remaking the Communist Party-State,” 1–15.
35 Zhou, “Governing China’s Local Officials,” 36–50.
36 Mei and Wang, “Political Incentives and Local Policy Innovations in China,” 519–547; Zheng et al., “Incentives for China's Urban Mayors,” 61–71; Kostka and Xiaofan, “Career Backgrounds of Municipal Party Secretaries in China,” 467–505.
37 Li and Zhou, “Political Turnover and Economic Performance,” 1743–1762.
38 Choi, “Patronage and Performance,” 965–981.
39 Mei and Wang, “Political Incentives,” 519–547.
40 Flatø, “Trust is in the Air”.
41 Zheng et al., “Incentives for China's Urban Mayors,” 61–71.
42 Chen et al., “Energy Productivity and Chinese Local Officials’ Promotions,” 103–112.
43 Pu and Fu, “Economic Growth,” 454–465.
44 Wu et al., “Incentives and Outcomes”.
45 Cao et al., “Why Invest in Wind Energy,” 120–131.
46 See note 1.
47 Eaton and Kostka, “Does Cadre Turnover Help or Hinder China’s Green Rise?,” 83–110; Eaton and Kostka, “Authoritarian Environmentalism Undermined,” 359–380.
48 Cao et al., “Environmental Political Business Cycles,” 92–100.
49 Kostka, “Environmental Protection Bureau Leadership,” 41–63.
50 Yang, “Local Government Reform in China,” https://cddrl.fsi.stanford.edu/publications/local_government_reform_in_china_in_the_past_ten_years_an_evaluation_based_on_the_chinese_local_governance_innovation_awards
51 Liu et al., “The Drivers of Local Environmental Policy in China,” 656–666.
52 Statistical Table of Administrative Divisions of the People’s Republic of China. http://xzqh.mca.gov.cn/statistics/2017.html (in Chinese).
53 Fuller, “Weighting to Adjust for Survey Nonresponse,” 239–246.
54 Constitution of the Communist Party of China. Retrieved from http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/dfpd/18da/2012-08/29/content_15714541_7.htm (in Chinese).
55 Regulations on the Selection and Appointment of Leading Party and Government. http://www.xinhuanet.com/politics/2019-03/17/c_1124245012.htm (in Chinese).
56 Qi and Huang, “The Changing Law of the Selection and Appointment of Chinese Governors,” 39–46.
57 Qi and Lu, “The Rules of Appointment of Mayors at the Prefecture-Level Cities,” 69–75, 189.
58 Huang, “Managing Chinese Bureaucrats,” 61–79; Landry, Decentralized Authoritarianism in China.
59 See note 49.
60 Due to the data availability, Table only includes samples with complete career history data, while Table includes the samples with complete career history data and the samples with only information for the last position prior to assuming EPBH.
61 See note 49.
62 ibid
63 Kostka and Xiaofan, “Career Backgrounds of Municipal Party Secretaries in China,” 467–505; Liu et al., “Promotion for Performance”.
64 See note 10.
65 ibid
66 Liang and Langbein, “Performance Management,” 346–385; Pu and Fu, “Economic Growth,” 454–465.
67 "Who polluted environmental agencies?,” http://www.jjjcb.cn/content/2014-04/22/content_26569.htm (in Chinese).
68 See note 11.
69 "Two consecutive directors of Linfen Environmental Protection Bureau in Shanxi Province were dismissed after less than half a year's service". https://www.thepaper.cn/newsDetail_forward_2209057 (in Chinese).
70 See notes 56 and 57.
71 Eaton and Kostka, “Does Cadre Turnover Help or Hinder China’s Green Rise?,” 83–110.
72 See note 49.
73 See note 63.
Additional information
Funding
Notes on contributors
Lei Liu
Lei Liu is a professor at the School of Public Administration, Sichuan University. He has been a Jean-Monnet fellow at European University Institute and a visiting scholar at the Ostrom Workshop of Indiana University. His research interests mainly focus on environmental policy and governance in China.
Lixu Tang
Lixu Tang is a master candidate at the School of Public Administration, Sichuan University, with a research focus on public policy.
Rui Liu
Rui Liu is an associate professor at the School of Public Administration, Sichuan University.
Mingyue Li
Mingyue Li is a master candidate at the School of Public Administration, Sichuan University, with a research focus on public policy.