202
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

Interregional collaboration for food safety governance: the scheme design and performance evaluation with cases in China

, &
Pages 234-255 | Received 08 Jul 2021, Accepted 05 Oct 2022, Published online: 20 Oct 2022
 

Abstract

The spatial spillover of food safety risks and the regional mobility of food enterprises make territorial governance inefficient, which calls for interregional collaboration to enhance food safety in the context of territorial governance. However, due to the lack of a collaborative food safety governance scheme, there has been no substantial progress in interregional collaboration for food safety governance in China. Therefore, this paper refines the three key elements of collaboration from the perspective of supply chain, economy and geography and puts forward the optimal zoning scheme of interregional collaboration for food safety governance. By analysing the evolution trend of interregional collaboration, we found China has already produced the germination of interregional collaboration in terms of food safety issues, though it has been slow and volatile. To promote the process of interregional collaboration, this paper also analyses the determinants of the coordinated regulatory performance of food safety. The results show that collaborative actions within regions can facilitate coordinated regulatory practice. The interregional difference in regulatory intensity and consumption patterns hinder the interregional collaboration for food safety governance, while the interregional difference in industrial structure inversely promotes the coordinated regulatory performance. These findings lend support to effective promotion of interregional collaboration.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Notes

1 Noto et al., “Measuring the Performance of Collaborative Governance in Food Safety Management,” 1–10; Yang et al., “The Impact of Peer Product Quality on the Enterprises,” 60–68.

2 European Commission, Building food safety governance in China.

3 Xie et al., “Managing and Financing Metropolitan Public Services in China,” 445–452; Schmitter, “Defining, Explaining and, Then, Exploiting the Elusive Concept of ‘Governance’,” 547–567; Wang, “Seeking Performance or Control?” 503–524; Yang et al., “Constructing the Accountability of Food Safety as a Public Problem in China,” 236–265.

4 Donkers, “Governance for Local and Regional Food Systems,” 178–208; Buckley, “Food Safety Regulation and Small Processing,” 74–82; Li et al., “Spatial Distribution and Changing Trend of Food Safety Incidents in China.” 9–16; Abdi and Aulakh, “Locus of Uncertainty and the Relationship between Contractual and Relational Governance in Cross-Border Interfirm Relationships.” Hale and Bartlett, “Managing the Regulatory Tangle,” 257–279; Liu et al., “Rebuilding Milk Safety Trust in China,” 266–290.

5 Imami et al., “Food Safety and Value Chain Coordination in the Context of a Transition Economy,” 21–34.

6 Zhang et al., “Inter-Regional Governance,” 102–109. Zhang et al. demonstrate that the structure of food safety regulation can be divided into three types: vertical collaboration (e.g. collaboration between central and local authorities), horizontal collaboration (e.g. collaboration among local authorities), and cross-agency collaboration (e.g. collaboration among local authorities, enterprises, non-governmental organizations, the media, and the public).

7 Krueger, “A Transaction Costs Explanation of Inter-Local Government Collaboration”; Daley, “Interdisciplinary Problems and Agency Boundaries,” 477–493; Martin-Misener et al., “A Scoping Literature Review of Collaboration between Primary Care and Public Health,” 327–346; Bolumole et al., “The Economic Development Role of Regional Logistics Hubs,” 182–198.

8 Castañer and Oliveira, “Collaboration, Coordination, and Cooperation among Organizations,” 965–1001.

9 Smelser, Theory of Collective Behavior.

10 Olson, The Logic of Collective Action; Feiock, “The Institutional Collective Action Framework,” 397–425; Feiock “The Institutional Collective Action Framework,” 397–425; Hu et al., “Air Pollution Regional Linkage Control and Prevention from the Perspective of Environmental Regulation,” 24–42; Yang et al., “What Values Are Evaluated?” 1–27; Feiock et al., “Institutional collective action and economic development joint ventures,” 256–270.

11 General Office of the State Council, “Decision of The General Office of the State Council on Strengthening Food Safety Work.”

12 Chen, “Local Economic Development and the Performance of Municipal People’s Congress Deputies in China,” 395–410.

13 Unnevehr, “Food Safety as a Global Public Good,” 149–158; Wong, “Performance, Factions, and Promotion in China,” 41–75; Xie et al., “Managing and Financing Metropolitan Public Services in China.”

14 Buchanan and Tullock, “Public and Private Interaction under Reciprocal Externality,” 52–73.

15 Ibid.

16 Datta and Christopher, “Information Sharing and Coordination Mechanisms for Managing Uncertainty in Supply Chains,” 765–803.

17 Ibid.; Chen et al., “Supply Chain Operational Risk Mitigation,” 2186–2199.

18 Scharpf, Games Real Actors Play; Hu et al., “Air Pollution Regional Linkage Control and Prevention from the Perspective of Environmental Regulation.”

19 Gerber et al., “Political Homophily and Collaboration in Regional Planning Networks,” 598–610; Zhou et al., “Dynamic and Spillover Effects of USA Import Refusals on China’s Agricultural Trade,” 425–434.

20 Wang and Lai. “A Study on the Model and Mechanism of Public Policy Diffusion in China,” 14–23.

21 Feiock et al., “From economic cooperation to innovative cooperation: Self-upgrading and superior authority”, 17–43.

22 Zupic and Čater, “Bibliometric Methods in Management and Organization,” 429–472.

23 Cheng et al., “Coupling Coordination Degree and Spatial Dynamic Evolution of a Regional Green Competitiveness System,” 489–500; Jiang et al., “Coupling and Coordinating Degrees of Provincial Economy, Resources and Environment in China,” 799; Li et al., “Investigation of a Coupling Model of Coordination between Urbanization and the Environment,” 127–133; Shi et al., “Coupling Coordination Degree Measurement and Spatiotemporal Heterogeneity between Economic Development and Ecological Environment,” 118739.

24 Jiang et al., “Coupling and Coordinating Degrees of Provincial Economy, Resources and Environment in China.”

25 Eppel et al., “Better Connected Services for Kiwis.”

26 Mewhirter and Berardo. “The Impact of Forum Interdependence and Network Structure on Actor Performance in Complex Governance Systems,” 159–177.

27 Baker et al., “Measuring Economic Policy Uncertainty,” 1593–1636.

28 Leland, “Quacks, Lemons, and Licensing,” 1328–1346; Zhou et al., “Examining the Role of Border Protectionism in Border Inspections,” 593–613.

29 Zhou et al., “Dynamic and Spillover Effects of USA Import Refusals on China’s Agricultural Trade.”

30 See note 25 above.

31 Bakos, “The Emerging Landscape for Retail e-Commerce,” 69–80; Kang and Guan, “On Online Food Safety co-Regulation,” 339–345.

32 Han et al., “COVID-19 Pandemic Crisis and Food Safety: Implications and Inactivation Strategies,” 25–36.

33 Giacomarra et al., “The Integration of Quality and Safety Concerns in the Wine Industry: The Role of Third-Party Voluntary Certifications,” 267–274; Kotsanopoulos and Arvanitoyannis, “The Role of Auditing, Food Safety, and Food Quality Standards in the Food Industry,” 760–775.

34 Qi, “The Duality of Food Safety Risk Attribute and Its Implication for the Reform of Regulatory Legal System,” 46–69.

35 Yuan and Fan. “Identity, Social Exclusion and Perceived Performance of Local Government ,” 675–693; Zhou et al., “Analysis on Differences between Consumer Risk Perception of Food Safety and Recovery Purchasing Behavior” 111–117.

Additional information

Funding

The research was partly sponsored by EC H2020-MSCA-RISE-2017, Project 777742; the National Social Science Fund of China, Project No. 19ZDA106; Zhejiang University Global Partnership Fund, Project No. 188170*194252204; and Tsinghua Rural Studies PhD Scholarship, No. 201912.

Notes on contributors

Yu Wang

Dr Yu Wang is a research associate at Zhejiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences. Her research interests cover food safety management, public governance and agricultural trade. She has participated in three national research projects funded by NSFC and Ministry of Education of China, and two international collaborative programs.

Dong Li

Dr Dong Li, Reader in Operations and Marketing Department, Management School, University of Liverpool. He is an experienced researcher in Supply Chain Management, in particular, sustainable supply chains and green logistics. He has been awarded as a research project leader by EC H2020, FP7, ERDF and UK Newton, EPSRC, TSB for research projects on sustainable food supply chains, green logistics, local food logistics, green packaging in supply chains and integrated maritime logistics systems in the last decade. He has participated in research collaboration funded by China NSFC on sustainable city logistics research. He has intensively published in the supply chain management (more than 60 papers) and highly ranked in Thomson Reuters Web of Science in the food supply chain management area.

Jiehong Zhou

Prof. Jiehong Zhou is a professor in Agricultural and Economic Management, Zhejiang University. Her research focuses on food safety and sustainable supply chain management. She has sponsored 13 national research projects funded by NSFC, NSSF, Ministry of Education of China, 15 provincial research projects and 2 international collaboration projects. Her research findings have been published in more than 60 refereed papers in food safety and sustainable supply chain areas, including more than 20 SSCI/SCI papers and over 20 papers published in leading journals in China. Her monograph published in English about food safety management in China is the first one that systematically introduces China’s food safety to foreign scholars and it had been listed in Social Sciences and Asian Studies.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 195.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.