![Sample our Communication Studies journals, sign in here to start your access, 2013 & 2014 volumes FREE to you for 14 days]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/5927/TOC-Subject-Sample-2021-Information-Science2.jpg"})
Abstract
Even before his death in 2013, the federal prosecution of Aaron Swartz for hacking crimes was being called a “cause celebre” of activists protesting government regulation of the Internet. After his death, Swartz became what some called a “Cyber martyr” for the ideals of Internet freedom, free culture, and free information. This study focuses on the journalism surrounding Swartz, exploring how the ideals and values of cyberlibertarianism—a combination of techno-utopian enthusiasm and libertarian approaches to free speech and market principles—were embodied by Swartz in the press’s interpretations of his actions, life, and early death. The press, for the most part, boiled the apparent contradictions of this ideology down into a simple narrative about Swartz as a political activist in a way that not only failed to challenge the corporate neoliberal order emerging online, but also helped lay the ideological foundations for it among a broader public.
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).
Additional information
Notes on contributors
Michael Buozis
Michael Buozis is an assistant professor of media and communication at Muhlenberg College. His research, which has appeared in Journalism, Journalism Studies, American Journalism, Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies, Convergence, and Internet Histories, examines journalism, digital culture, and media history from a critical cultural studies perspective.