340
Views
24
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Evaluating the performance of habitat models for predicting the environmental flow requirements of benthic macroinvertebrates

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 30-44 | Received 09 Oct 2017, Accepted 23 Jan 2018, Published online: 19 Apr 2018
 

ABSTRACT

Although various methods are currently available for modelling the habitat preferences of aquatic biota, studies comparing the performance of data-driven habitat models are limited. In this study, we assembled a benthic-macroinvertebrate microhabitat-preference dataset and used it to evaluate the predictive accuracy of regression-based univariate Habitat Suitability Curves (HSC), Boosted Regression Trees (BRT), Random Forests (RF), fuzzy-logic-based models using the weighted average (FLWA), maximum membership (FLMM), mean of maximum (FLM) and centroid (FLC) defuzzification algorithms and fuzzy rule-based Bayesian inference (FRB). The results show that the BRT model was the most accurate, closely followed by RF, FRB, FLM and FLMM while the FLC and FLWA algorithms had the lowest performance. However, due to the imbalanced nature of the dataset and in contrast to the fuzzy rule-based algorithms, the HSC, BRT and RF models failed to accurately predict the habitat suitability in low-scored microhabitats. We conclude that, given balanced datasets, BRT and RF can be effectively used in habitat suitability modelling. For imbalanced datasets, a properly adjusted RF model can be applied but when the input dataset is large enough to provide sufficient data-driven IF–THEN rules to train an FRB, FLMM or FLM algorithm, these models will produce the most accurate predictions.

Acknowledgements

This research is part of a PhD project conducted in the Hellenic Centre for Marine Research (HCMR) under the supervision of the National Technical University of Athens (NTUA) and in close collaboration with the Technical University of Munich (TUM). The authors would like to thank the Institute of Marine Biological Resources and Inland Waters of the HCMR for providing the field sampling equipment and the NTUA and TUM for communicating the hydraulic experience and expertise to complete this project.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 61.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 221.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.