128
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Case Reports

Two patients with mixed connective tissue disease complicated by pulmonary arterial hypertension showing contrasting responses to pulmonary vasodilators

, , , , & ORCID Icon
Pages 253-261 | Received 15 Jan 2020, Accepted 13 Apr 2020, Published online: 04 May 2020
 

Abstract

Mixed connective tissue disease (MCTD) involves various clinical manifestations, and pulmonary hypertension (PH) is an important organ dysfunction defining the prognosis of MCTD. The pathology of PH is heterogeneous. Here, we present 2 cases of MCTD complicated by PH that had contrasting clinical courses. The first case involved a 54-year-old woman with Raynaud’s phenomenon and dyspnoea on exertion. She was diagnosed with MCTD accompanied by pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) and was treated with ambrisentan and tadalafil in addition to high-dose glucocorticoid (GC) therapy and rituximab therapy. After treatment, her PH resolved. The second case involved a 64-year-old woman with Raynaud’s phenomenon and dyspnoea on exertion. She was similarly diagnosed with MCTD accompanied by PAH and was treated with ambrisentan and tadalafil in addition to high-dose GC therapy and cyclophosphamide pulse therapy. However, she showed exacerbation of her respiratory condition and manifestation of pulmonary veno-occlusive disease (PVOD). Thus, the treatment was discontinued, and subsequently, her condition improved and eventually returned to that before treatment. The findings suggest that the presence or absence of latent PVOD might be an important factor for predicting the therapeutic responsiveness of MCTD-associated PH. Evaluation of chest radiography findings, computed tomography findings, percent vital capacity, and percent carbon monoxide diffusion capacity might be useful for predicting prognosis and might aid in treatment. PVOD could be underlying in patients with CTD-PH. When the complication of PVOD is suggested by chest CT or pulmonary function test, we need a careful introduction with pulmonary vasodilators. So, combination therapy of pulmonary vasodilators should not be applied in all patients with CTD-PH since underlying PVOD could deteriorate the patient’s condition.

Patient consent

For these case reports, informed consents were obtained in writing from patients.

Ethical approval

Not applicable.

Conflict of interest

Y. Tanaka received consulting fees, speaking fees, and/or honoraria from Daiichi-Sankyo, Astellas, Pfizer, Mitsubishi-Tanabe, Bristol-Myers, Chugai, YL Biologics, Eli Lilly, Sanofi, Janssen, UCB, and research grants from Mitsubishi-Tanabe, Takeda, Bristol-Myers, Chugai, Astellas, Abbvie, MSD, Daiichi-Sankyo, Pfizer, Kyowa-Kirin, Eisai, Ono. K. Nakano has received speaking fees from Bristol-Myers, Sanofi, AbbVie, Eisai, Eli Lilly, Chugai, Pfizer, Takeda, and Mitsubishi-Tanabe, and research grants from Mitsubishi-Tanabe and Eisai. S. Kubo has received speaking fees from Bristol-Myers, Eli Lilly, Pfizer, and Takeda.

Additional information

Funding

The authors did not receive funding for this study.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

There are no offers available at the current time.

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.