Professional youth football academy injury data: collection procedures, perceived value, and use

ABSTRACT

Purpose: There is a paucity of descriptive injury data relevant to professional academy football, with little to no evidence reporting how sports science/medicine staff within academies collect and use injury data.

Materials and methods: An online survey relating to the perceptions surrounding injury data collection, its value and use was developed. Forty-seven applied practitioners working for different professional football academies completed the survey.

Results: Injury data collection procedures conducted by appropriately trained medical staff are widespread among football academies. Injury data collection within academies was deemed worthwhile and important by 79% of practitioners. Similarly, 79% strongly agreed/agreed that using injury data for academic research is worthwhile. The engagement with and use of injury data by coaching staff appears to be relatively poor, with only 49% of practitioners stating coaches formally review data.

Conclusions: Injury data are widely collected within academies and practitioners consider this information valuable. However, improving engagement with coaches and using the data for academic research could further improve applied practice.

Practical implications: Applied practitioners should consider sharing injury data with both researchers and coaches. In doing so evidence-guided injury prevention interventions may be developed and subsequently applied in the field.

KEYWORDS:

• Adolescent
• epidemiology
• prevention
• injuries
• soccer

Practical implications

Applied practitioners should consider sharing injury data with both researchers and coaches. In doing so evidence-guided injury prevention interventions may be developed and subsequently applied in the field.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank all of the survey respondents for their insights. In addition the authors thank Sabrina Skorski and Ross Julian for their help in contacting potential participants. The authors also thank Alan McCall for reviewing early drafts of the manuscript.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.