568
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

The effect of post-match resistance training on recovery in female footballers; when is best to train?

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, & ORCID Icon
Pages 208-215 | Accepted 28 Sep 2020, Published online: 09 Oct 2020
 

ABSTRACT

Objective: This study examined the effects of resistance training (RT) performed at 24 or 48h post-match on recovery in female soccer players. Methods: In a randomized cross-over design, 10 professional female soccer players undertook matches followed by three conditions: Control (no RT), RT-24h and RT-48h post-match. RT was a high-speed and low-load session, consisting of 3 sets of 6 repetitions of lower-body exercises at 50%1RM. During training, one exercise (half-squat) was performed on a force platform to determine mean and peak forces. Tests were undertaken pre, 24, 48 and 72h post-match including countermovement jump (CMJ), 20m sprint, C-reactive protein (CRP) and delayed onset muscle soreness (DOMS). Two-way repeated-measures ANOVA and Effect size (ES) analyses compared the time-course of recovery. Results: Despite no significant differences between conditions, ES for changes from pre to 72h were larger for CMJ, 10 and 20m sprint time, and DOMS in RT48h (ES=0.38–2.13) than in RT24h (ES=0.08–0.66) and in Control (ES=0.09–0.36). No differences in forces of half-squat exercise existed between conditions (p>0.05; ES=0.05–0.06). Conclusion: The trend for suppressed recovery of speed, power and perceptual responses at 72h post-match suggests RT48h is less ideal in female soccer players, particularly during congested micro-cycles.

Acknowledgements

This study was financed in part by the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior - Brasil (CAPES) - Finance Code 001. The authors thank CAPES, Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do estado de Minas Gerais- (FAPEMIG/Minas Gerais/Brazil), National Counsel of Technological and Scientific Development (CNPq/Brazil) and the Pró-Reitoria de Pesquisa (PRPQ) [Research Pro-Rectory] from the UFMG.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Additional information

Funding

This study was conducted in the Load Evaluation Laboratory/UFMG – Brazil. This study was financed in part by the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior - Brasil (CAPES) - Finance Code 001. The authors thank CAPES, Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do estado de Minas Gerais- (FAPEMIG/Minas Gerais/Brazil), National Counsel of Technological and Scientific Development (CNPq/Brazil) and the Pró-Reitoria de Pesquisa (PRPQ) [Research Pro-Rectory] from the UFMG.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 61.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 280.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.