Publication Cover
Canadian Journal of Respiratory, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine
Revue canadienne des soins respiratoires et critiques et de la médecine du sommeil
Volume 4, 2020 - Issue 4
2,891
Views
9
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
CTS Guidelines and Position Papers

Delivering pulmonary rehabilitation during the COVID-19 pandemic: A Canadian Thoracic Society position statement

, , , , ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, , , , ORCID Icon, , , , , , , ORCID Icon & show all

Version 1.0 – September 9, 2020

Disclaimer

This position statement aims to provide guidance for resumption of pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) services during the post-peak phase of the COVID-19 pandemic (ie, period of low community prevalence). These recommendations are based on the consensus of the authors, who are members of the Canadian Thoracic Society (CTS) and on the information available at the time this document was written. Changes in the prevalence of COVID-19 or in our understanding of the disease may affect the recommendations in this statement. Guidance from local public health authorities and from institutional infection prevention and control departments should be considered when assessing information in this document. Readers should consult these resources as they develop plans for PR services.

This document will be updated as new information becomes available; therefore, we recommend checking the CTS website (https://cts-sct.ca/covid-19/) for updates.

Overview

PR is a comprehensive intervention based on a thorough patient assessment followed by individualized therapies that include, but are not limited to, exercise training, education and promotion of behavior change through the inclusion of self-management interventions. The goal of PR is to improve the physical and psychological health of people with chronic respiratory disease and to help patients to develop the skills and confidence they need to adopt a healthier lifestyle.Citation 1 PR is an important component of care for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and other chronic airway diseases (asthma, bronchiectasis), interstitial lung diseases and pulmonary hypertension.Citation 1 PR reduces dyspnea, increases exercise capacity, improves quality of life and diminishes healthcare resource utilization in individuals with COPD and has similar positive effects in patients with other chronic respiratory diseases.Citation 1

National PR quality indicators have been developed to provide guidance on components essential to a quality PR program.Citation 2 Key indicators among these are: a thorough history and physical assessment; objective measures that facilitate safe exercise prescription, aerobic and strength training, and outcome assessment. Readers are encouraged to implement the CTS-endorsed quality indicators, as all programs, whether conducted in-person or virtually, should strive to deliver programs of the highest possible quality.Citation 2

COPD is associated with an increased risk of severe COVID-19 illnessCitation 3 , Citation 4 and the presence of co-morbidities in those with other chronic respiratory diseases likely increases their risk of severe complications and mortality from COVID-19. The SARS-CoV-2 virus that causes COVID-19 is acquired and disseminated through respiratory droplets spread during coughing, sneezing and talking.Citation 5 The virus can also be transferred by touching the face (mouth, nose, eyes) with hands that have come into contact with the droplets containing the virus on fomites, such as hard surfaces. Therefore, it is important to consider how PR can be delivered safely and effectively during the COVID-19 pandemic. Although virtual PR is proving to be a viable option for many patients, there are challenges related to access and use of technology, optimal assessment and the ability to obtain outcome measures, as well as adequate supervision. These issues as well as the additional benefits of social interactions support the goal of restarting in-person programs when rates of community transmission are low.

This position statement describes approaches to in-person and virtual PR and offers resources to support PR delivery during the COVID-19 pandemic. It is acknowledged that patients recovering from COVID-19 may need rehabilitation, especially after prolonged illness when there can be profound peripheral muscle weakness and mental health sequelae. However, recommendations for patients recovering from COVID-19 but without respiratory conditions are beyond the scope of this statement.

Alternatives to in-person PR

There are a number of ways to offer PR remotely to either eliminate or substantially decrease the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection associated with in-person delivery models. There is growing evidence to support the use of home-basedCitation 6–10 and real time, on-line supervised telerehabilitation.Citation 9 A group of Canadian clinicians and researchers have developed a standardized PR program, which has been endorsed by the CTS.Citation 11 This PR program was adapted from the Living Well with COPD program and focuses on disease self-management, and can be delivered in-person or through web-based platforms (including at home).

Resources:

PR can be delivered virtually using various online platforms such as Zoom and Microsoft Teams. Program staff should observe their organization’s policies on privacy and security related to the use of such services. These platforms allow PR staff to provide interactive education sessions, real-time or prerecorded exercise classes, and case management. They offer some ability to assess and monitor the patient’s response to exercise but because of inherent limitations associated with the availability of equipment and other aspects of the home environment, modifications are needed in order to deliver virtual PR.

Considerations for delivering PR virtually

  1. Assessment of exercise capacity

    An important factor responsible for the positive outcomes associated with PR is individually prescribed exercise training that is objectively based on a test of exercise capacity. Neither a Six Minute Walk Test (6MWT) nor an Incremental Shuttle Walk Test (ISWT) can be administered according to recognized standardsCitation 12 in most home environments. The one-minute sit-to-stand test has been demonstrated to be a valid representation of aerobic capacity and leg strengthCitation 13 , Citation 14 and is responsive to changeCitation 15 , Citation 16 in people with COPD. However, currently the results cannot be easily used to prescribe a walking or cycling program.

    Alternatively, as outpatient services re-open, PR programs may choose to have patients attend in-person exercise assessments using a 6MWT, ISWT or cardiopulmonary exercise tests with appropriate monitoring, the results of which can be used to prescribe personalized in-home or virtual aerobic exercise training. This approach has been used successfully by Holland et al. in their home-based rehabilitation trial.Citation 7

  2. Monitoring exercise responses

    Assessment of the response to exercise is key to guiding exercise intensity and progression, and to enhancing patient safety.Citation 2 While some patients may have home oximetry, and heart rate and blood pressure monitors that can assist with objectively monitoring exercise responses, many programs will need to rely on the modified Borg Dyspnea (0–10) and Rating of Perceived Exertion (6–20) scales. Patients will need to be proficient in monitoring exercise responses accurately, and program staff should consider whether patient self-monitoring is sufficient or whether real-time virtual monitoring is needed.

  3. Safety

    While adverse events with home or virtual PR are uncommon, safety of the home exercise environment should be assessed. Safety concerns such as electrical cords, clutter, loose rugs, dim lighting, oxygen tubing and availability of a sturdy support surface should be identified and managed. Patients should be encouraged to have a support person present during all exercise sessions to provide assistance or call for help, if needed. The usual precautions regarding the risk of SARS-CoV-2 virus and other virus transmission should also be encouraged and managed especially during exercise sessions. Organizations such as the College of Physiotherapists of Ontario (https://www.collegept.org/registrants/virtual-practice-in-physiotherapy) mandate that physiotherapists must have a plan on how to deal with an emergency when doing virtual care. Staff should consult their local professional organization and institutional policies and procedures on this issue.

    Caution should be taken when considering home or virtual PR for patients with pulmonary hypertension and those who are pre-lung transplant or have very high O2 needs, given the limitations of home monitoring and paucity of data on optimal exercise training intensity in unsupervised environments in these patient groups.

    Resource:

    • Expectations Regarding Tele-rehabilitation (Virtual Practice) Based on Existing College of Physiotherapists of Ontario Standards and Rules

    https://www.collegept.org/registrants/virtual-practice-in-physiotherapy

  4. Education and Self-Management Intervention

    Education and self-management intervention are vital to facilitate long-term adherence to health-enhancing behaviors.Citation 2 There are many alternatives to offering in-person delivery of these essential components of PR. Holland and colleagues provided motivational interviewing by phone in their home-based PR program.Citation 7 The use of videoconferencing allows presentations, group discussions and activities that may enhance traditional education and counseling techniques. In addition to usual content,Citation 2 programs should include practical education on and reinforce public health advisories regarding avoiding acquisition and spread of the virus that causes Covid-19 illness.

    Resources:

In-person pulmonary rehabilitation

As previously indicated, virtual PR presents significant challenges to exercise prescription and safety. Virtual or home-based PR may be challenging for some patients, especially those uncomfortable with the required technology or those residing in rural communities that lack the high-speed internet service needed to support viable online PR platforms. Other patients may prefer an in-person social environment. As rates of community spread of COVID-19 decrease, some programs are considering restarting in-person PR.

The Public Health Agency of Canada, provincial and local public health or infection units offer guidance on ways to decrease transmission and infection rates of SARS-CoV-2. Facility specific planning that includes all PR staff as well as other relevant stakeholders (respirologist/medical director, infection control representative, occupational health and safety) is crucial during planning and initiation, and throughout program delivery during the pandemic.

The following are some of the issues that must be considered when assessing the safety of providing this type of program.

  1. Screening Procedures for In-Person PR

    As respiratory patients may be immunosuppressed, the relative risk versus benefits should be considered when referring these patients to in-person PR. Patients and staff should observe their facility’s procedures for daily screening for COVID-19. Many patients attending PR will have symptoms that are similar to those of COVID-19 (eg, cough, sore throat, dyspnea, myalgia or fatigue), and therefore patients should be asked specifically about new symptoms and potential exposures. If patients have a positive screen, the local SARS-CoV-2 infection control protocols should be consulted to determine follow-up. In addition, all patients should be assessed for their ability to practice appropriate safety precautions, including physical distancing, hand hygiene, proper mask use and the ability to respond accurately to pre-program screening questions.

    Patients who have had COVID-19 will only be able to take part in in-person PR when they are deemed to no longer be contagious based on local infection control practices.

  2. Exercise Space and Equipment

    Whenever possible, patients should wear a mask during exercise to reduce the risk of virus transmission to other patients or staff. Some patients may be unable to wear a mask during exercise; therefore, physical distancing of exercise equipment is recommended. There is some evidence to suggest that 2 meters between pieces of equipment is insufficient protection as coughing and deep breathing with exercise may increase the spread of droplets from an infected individual.Citation 17 Positioning exercise equipment so patients can avoid being in the direct path of expiratory flow from patients should be considered. Class sizes will likely need to be limited to avoid sharing exercise equipment. Facility policies may allow equipment to be cleaned between participants. Sufficient time should be given between classes to allow for droplets to settle or dissipate, and for cleaning and disinfecting of surfaces.

    Patients should sanitize their hands when entering the exercise space and after using each piece of equipment.

  3. Waiting Areas

    Hand sanitizer should be available in the waiting area. Patients and caregivers should wear masks and observe physical distancing in waiting areas. This may be encouraged by using posters that provide education in the waiting area (Guidance on face mask use can be found on the CTS website.) Single-use medical masks are recommended to ensure cleanliness. Caregivers or family members offering transportation or other support should not remain in the waiting area during the class. Limit personal items worn or brought to class to those used during the session or those that are essential for safety.

    All non-essential miscellaneous materials, such as magazines and plants, should be removed from patient areas. Any furniture in the space should be easy to clean and disinfect between classes (vinyl vs. cloth surfaces) and no pillowcases or towels should be used. Use floor marking to indicate appropriate physical distancing and to establish one-way patient flow in and out of the treatment space and waiting area.

  4. Education and Self-management intervention

    Consider offering education and behavior change classes virtually to limit in-person contact time.

Key points

  1. People with chronic respiratory diseases who have COVID-19 are at high risk of developing severe illness; therefore, it is important to limit any potential exposure to the SARS-CoV-2 virus.

  2. PR should offer education on and reinforce public health advisories regarding reducing risk of SARS-CoV-2 infections.

  3. Options for remote delivery of PR include home-based, telerehabilitation and computer-based virtual programs. These can be designed to provide education and exercise with some programs being capable of remote monitoring of exercise performance.

  4. The ability to individualize and monitor exercise intensity may be limited when in-person PR is not possible.

  5. In-person PR may be considered when community spread of COVID-19 is low, and when patients have needs that are difficult to address remotely or when patient access to technology is limited.

  6. Hybrid models that include in-person assessment and exercise testing, and a combination of in-person and virtual exercise training, education and self-management can be used to optimize exercise safety and training effectiveness while decreasing disease transmission and infection rates.

  7. Strict attention to mask use, physical distancing and disinfection protocols must be observed by staff and patients if in-person PR is offered. Equipment should not be shared among patients unless appropriate disinfecting and cleaning protocols are utilized.

References

  • Spruit MA , Singh SJ , Garvey C , et al. ATS/ERS Task Force on Pulmonary Rehabilitation. An official American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society statement: key concepts and advances in pulmonary rehabilitation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med . 2013;188(8):e13–e64. doi:10.1164/rccm.201309-1634ST.
  • Dechman G , Cheung W , Ryerson CJ , et al. Quality indicators for pulmonary rehabilitation programs in Canada: A Canadian Thoracic Society expert working group report. Can J Respir Crit Care Sleep Med . 2019;3(4):199–109. doi:10.1080/24745332.2019.1643610.
  • Alqahtani JS , Oyelade T , Aldhahir AM , et al. Prevalence, Severity and Mortality associated with COPD and Smoking in patients with COVID-19: A Rapid Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. PLoS One . 2020; 15(5):e0233147. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0233147.
  • Lippi G , Henry BM. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease is associated with severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Respir Med . 2020;167:105941. doi:10.1016/j.rmed.2020.105941.
  • Amirian ES. Potential fecal transmission of SARS-CoV-2: Current evidence and implications for public health. Int J Infect Dis . 2020;95:363–370. doi:10.1016/j.ijid.2020.04.057.
  • Maltais F , Bourbeau J , Shapiro S , Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Axis of Respiratory Health Network, Fonds de recherche en santé du Québec, et al. Effects of Home-Based Pulmonary Rehabilitation in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary disease: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med . 2008;149(12):869–878. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-149-12-200812160-00006.
  • Holland AE , Mahal A , Hill CJ , et al. Home-based rehabilitation for COPD using minimal resources: a randomised, controlled equivalence trial. Thorax. 2017;72(1):57–65. doi:10.1136/thoraxjnl-2016-208514.
  • Wuytack F , Devane D , Stovold E , et al. Comparison of outpatient and home-based exercise training programmes for COPD: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Respirology . 2018;23(3):272–283. doi:10.1111/resp.13224.
  • Macrea M , ZuWallack R , Nici L. There's no place like home: Integrating pulmonary rehabilitation into the home setting. Monaldi Arch Chest Dis . 2017;87(2):859. doi:10.4081/monaldi.2017.859.
  • Babu AS , Padmakumar R , Nayak K , et al. Effects of home-based exercise training on functional outcomes and quality of life in patients with pulmonary hypertension: A randomized clinical trial. Indian Heart J . 2019;71(2):161–165. doi:10.1016/j.ihj.2019.03.002.
  • Selzler AM , Wald J , Sedeno M , et al. Telehealth pulmonary rehabilitation: A review of the literature and an example of a nationwide initiative to improve the accessibility of pulmonary rehabilitation. Chron Respir Dis . 2018;15(1):41–47. doi:10.1177/1479972317724570.
  • Holland AE , Spruit MA , Troosters T , et al. An official European Respiratory Society/American Thoracic Society technical standard: field walking tests in chronic respiratory disease. Eur Respir J . 2014;44(6):1428–1446. doi:10.1183/09031936.00150314.
  • Ozalevli S , Ozden A , Itil O , Akkoclu A. Comparison of the sit-to-stand test with 6 min walk test in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Respir Med . 2007;101(2):286–293. doi:10.1016/j.rmed.2006.05.007.
  • Gephine S , Bergeron S , Tremblay Labrecque PF , et al. Cardiorespiratory Response during the 1-min Sit-to-Stand Test in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. Med Sci Sports Exerc . 2020;52(7):1441–1448. doi:10.1249/mss.0000000000002276.
  • Vaidya T , de Bisschop C , Beaumont M , et al. Is the 1-minute sit-to-stand test a good tool for the evaluation of the impact of pulmonary rehabilitation? Determination of the minimal important difference in COPD. COPD . 2016;Volume11:2609–2616. doi:10.2147/COPD.S115439.
  • Crook S , Busching G , Schultz K , et al. A multicentre validation of the 1-min sit-to-stand test in patients with COPD. Eur Respir J . 2017;49(3):1601871. doi:10.1183/13993003.01871-2016.
  • Verma S , Dhanak M , Frankenfield J. Visualizing the effectiveness of face masks in obstructing respiratory jets. Phys Fluids (1994) . 2020;32(6):061708. doi:10.1063/5.0016018.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.