244
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

Comparison between teams of different ranks in small-sided and conditioned games tournaments

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 608-623 | Received 21 Mar 2019, Accepted 11 Jul 2019, Published online: 16 Jul 2019
 

ABSTRACT

The aim of this study was to compare the quantity, the quality and the outcome of the tactical actions of the champions’ teams compared to runner-up and third-placed teams in small-sided and conditioned games tournaments in the under-15 category. We analyzed 18 teams composed of three players, they were 13.92 ± 1.17 years old and with 5.65 ± 2.65 years of time practice. These players performed 4,716 tactical actions evaluated by System of Tactical Assessment in Soccer (FUT-SAT). Descriptive statistics (mean, standard deviation and percentage difference), Shapiro–Wilk test, independent t-test, Mann–Whitney test, paired t-test, and Cohen’s kappa test were used. The results indicated that the champions’ teams accomplished more offensive tactical actions (quantitatively) and were more efficient (qualitatively) in these actions than the other teams. In addition, the champions’ teams were more effectiveness (action outcomes) in offensive and defensive movements. Otherwise, the runner-up and third-placed performed more (quantitatively) defensive tactical actions and were more efficient (qualitatively) in these actions. It is concluded that the champions’ teams had more initiative in the matches due to the greater quantity and quality of their offensive tactical actions and more effectiveness in the offensive and defensive actions, while their opponents were reactive.

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by FAPEMIG, SEESP-MG through the LIE, CAPES, CNPq, FUNARBE, the UFV Rectory, Pro-Rectory of Research and Post-Graduation and the Center for Biological and Health Sciences of the Universidade Federal de Viçosa.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Additional information

Funding

This study was supported by FAPEMIG, SEESP-MG through the LIE, CAPES, CNPq, FUNARBE, the UFV Rectory, Pro-Rectory of Research and Post-Graduation and the Center for Biological and Health Sciences of the Universidade Federal de Viçosa.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 61.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 204.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.