Publication Cover
Structural Heart
The Journal of the Heart Team
Volume 1, 2017 - Issue 3-4
114
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Research

Determinants and Prognostic Value of Longitudinal Strain in Asymptomatic Aortic Stenosis and Preserved Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction—The COFRASA/GENERAC Study

, MD, , MD, , MD, , MD, , MD, , MD, PhD, , MS, , MD, , MD & , MD, PhD show all
Pages 182-187 | Received 13 Mar 2017, Accepted 13 Jul 2017, Published online: 27 Jul 2017
 

ABSTRACT

Background: Longitudinal strain has been proposed as a sensitive marker of left ventricular systolic dysfunction. However its prognostic value in patients with aortic stenosis (AS) remains debated.

Methods: In a prospective cohort of asymptomatic patients with at least mild, isolated AS and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), clinical, biological measurements, global longitudinal strain (GLS) and basal longitudinal strain (BLS) were performed at study entry. The occurrence of AS-related events (sudden death, congestive heart failure, new onset of symptoms) or aortic valve replacement within two years was recorded prospectively.

Results: A total of 140 patients were enrolled and 21 events occurred. In contrast to GLS, BLS was significantly correlated to AS severity (p = 0.0006 with PV, p = 0.0002 with MPG, p = 0.01 with AVA, and p = 0.0009 with AVAi) and predicted the occurrence of AS-related events in the subset of severe AS in univariate analysis (p = 0.03) and after adjustment for AVA (p = 0.01), AVAi (p = 0.01), PV (p = 0.045), and MPG (p = 0.05). However, there was an important overlap of baseline BLS values between patients who developed symptoms and those who did not and repeated BLS measurements showed no difference between baseline values and those obtained at the time of overt symptoms in nine patients (p = 0.38).

Conclusion: BLS was statistically predictive of AS-related events in the subset of severe AS. However, overlap of BLS values between groups of symptomatic status and similar values at baseline and at the time of overt symptoms raise the question of its use at an individual level at least as a single isolated parameter.

Acknowledgments

We would like to especially thank the team of the Centre d’Investigation Clinique, Christophe Aucan from the Assistance Publique – Hopitaux de Paris Département de la Recherche Clinique et du Développement and Estelle Marcault from the Unité de Recherche Clinique Paris Nord for their help and support during all these years.

Disclosure statement

Dr. Virginia Nguyen was supported by a grant from the Société Française de Cardiologie and the Fédération Française de Cardiologie; Dr. Melissopoulou was supported by a grant from the Association Citadelle Recherche et Formation – CHR de la Citadelle, Liège, Belgium. The COFRASA (clinicalTrial.gov number NCT 00338676) and GENERAC (clinicalTrial.gov number NCT00647088) studies are supported by grants from the Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris (PHRC National 2005 and 2010, and PHRC regional 2007). None of the authors has conflicts of interest or disclosures related to the present paper.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

There are no offers available at the current time.

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.