5. Putting universities in their place: The ORPHIC Framework

Click to increase image sizeClick to decrease image size

Notes

1 Brennan J, King R and Lebeau Y (2004) The Role of Universities in the Transformation of Societies: An International Research Project. Milton Keynes: Centre for Higher Education Research and Information/Association of Commonwealth Universities, UK.

2 Benneworth, Zeeman N, Pinheiro R and Karlsen J (2017) National higher education policies challenging universities’ regional engagement activities. Ekonomiaz, 92(2): 112–139.

3 Benneworth P (2012) The relationship of regional engagement to universities’ core purposes: Reflections from engagement efforts with socially excluded communities. In R. Pinheiro and G. A. Jones (eds.), Universities and Regional Development. A Critical Assessment of Tensions and Contradictions, pp 199–218. New York: Routledge.

4 Cochrane A and Williams R (2013) Putting higher education in its place: The socio-political geographies of English universities. Policy and Politics, 41(1): 43–58.

5 Power D and Malmberg A (2008) The contribution of universities to innovation and economic development: In what sense a regional problem? Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 1: 233–245.

6 European Universities Association (2007) Managing the University Community: Exploring Good Practices. Brussels: European Universities Association.

7 Kempton L (2019) Wishful thinking? Towards a more realistic role for universities in regional innovation policy. European Planning Studies, 27(11): 2248–2265.

8 Foray D and Lissoni F (2010) University research and public–private interaction. In BH Hall and N Rosenberg (eds.), Handbook of Economics of Technical Change, pp 275–314. North Holland Elsevier.

9 Marmolejo F and Pukka J (2006) Supporting the contribution of higher education to regional development: Lesson learned from an OECD review of 14 regions through 12 countries. Paper presented at the UNESCO Forum on Higher Education. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED494412.pdf

10 Benneworth P, Zeeman N, Pinheiro R and Karlsen J (2017) National higher education policies challenging universities’ regional engagement activities. Ekonomiaz, 92(2): 112–139.

11 D’Este P and Patel P (2007) University–industry linkages in the UK: What are the factors underlying the variety of interactions with industry? Research Policy, 36: 1295–1313.

12 Lach S and Schankerman M (2008) Incentives and invention in universities. Rand Journal of Economics, 39(2): 403–433.

13 Stanton TK (2008) New times demand a new scholarship: Opportunities and challenges for civic engagement at research universities. Education, Citizenship and Social Justice, 3: 19–42.

14 Kempton L (2016) Institutional challenges and tensions. In J Goddard, E Hazelkorn, L Kempton and P Vallance (eds.), The Civic University: The Policy and Leadership Challenges, pp 281–297. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

15 Trippl M, Sinozic T and Lawton Smith H (2015) The role of universities in regional development: Conceptual models and policy institutions in the UK, Sweden and Austria. European Planning Studies, 23(9): 1722–1740.

16 Edwards J, Marinelli, E, Arregui Pabollet, E and Kempton L (2017) Higher Education for Smart Specialisation—Towards Strategic Partnerships for Innovation (S3 Policy Brief Series No. 23/2017). Seville: European Commission Joint Research Centre.

17 Cohen WM and Levinthal D A (1990) Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35: 128–152.

18 Harris R, Fitzpatrick K, Souch C, Brunsdon C, Jarvis C, Keylock C, Orford O, Singleton A and Tate N (2013) Quantitative Methods in Geography: Making the Connections between Schools, Universities and Employers. London: Royal Geographical Society with IBG.

19 Veugelers R and Del Rey E (2014) The Contribution of Universities to Innovation, (Regional) Growth and Employment (analytical Report No. 18). Munich: EENEE.

20 Oughton C, Landabaso M and Morgan K (2002) The regional innovation paradox: Innovation policy and industrial policy. Journal of Technology Transfer, 27: 97–110.

21 European Commission (2007) Improving Knowledge Transfer between Research Institutions and Industry across Europe: Embracing Open Innovation—Implementing the Lisbon Agenda. Brussels: European Commission.

22 Tödtling F and Trippl M (2005) One size fits all? Towards a differentiated regional innovation policy approach. Research Policy, 34(8): 1203–1219.

23 Zukauskaite E, Trippl M and Plechero M (2017) Institutional thickness revisited. Economic Geography, 93: 325–345.

24 Goddard J, Coombes M, Kempton L and Vallance P (2014) Universities as anchor institutions in cities in a turbulent funding environment: Vulnerable institutions and vulnerable places in England. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 7(2): 307–325.

25 Brown R (2016) Mission impossible? Entrepreneurial universities and peripheral regional innovation systems. Industry and Innovation, 23(2): 189–205.

26 Hazelkorn E (2016) Contemporary debates. Part I: Theorising civic engagement. In J. Goddard, E. Hazelkorn, L. Kempton and P. Vallance (eds.), The Civic University: The Policy and Leadership Challenges, pp 34–64. Edward Elgar.

27 Uyarra E and Flanagan K (2010) From regional systems of innovation to regions as innovation policy spaces. Environment and Planning C—Governance and Policy, 28(4): 681–695.

28 Edwards et al. (2017), see Reference 16; Marlow D, Kempton L and Tewdwr-Jones M (2019) Inclusive Future Growth in England’s Cities and Regions: Realising the Transformational University Dividend. Newcastle upon Tyne: Newcastle City Futures.

[Reference 29 deleted]

29 Kempton (2019), see Reference 7.

30 In the case of merged institutions, the age of the oldest of the original institutions was used.

31 Including under- and postgraduate, full and part-time.

32 Boucher G, Conway C and Van der Meer E (2003) Tiers of engagement by universities in their region’s development. Regional Studies, 37: 887–889.