0
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Pure Mathematics

Characterization of the generalized Hausdorff and quasi Hausdorff operators on weighted integrable spaces

Article: 2384694 | Received 16 Mar 2024, Accepted 23 Jul 2024, Published online: 31 Jul 2024

ABSTRACT

We examine the Hausdorff and Quasi Hausdorff matrices which act as an operator on Hardy spaces by its action on Taylor coefficients of an analytic function. Using the integral representation of the series on the Hardy spaces, we find the conditions on the weight functions on R+, to determine the boundedness of the operator on weighted integrable spaces and its adjoint operator on the respective domain.

MATHEMATICS SUBJECT CLASSIFICATION:

1. Introduction

Cesàro, Euler, Taylor and Hausdorff means have been studied in connection with summability of the series and assorted function spaces like integrable spaces, Hardy spaces, Bergman spaces see for example (Alexits, Citation1953; Hardy, Citation1943; Hung et al., Citation2006; Kalaivani & Youvaraj, Citation2013; Liflyand, Citation2013), and (Kalaivani & Madhu, Citation2024).

Hardy (Hardy, Citation1920) examined Cesàro matrix act as an operator on pintegrable spaces and determined the norm of the operator. Hardy’s result provides wide visibility to analyzing the behavior of Cesàro operator in various spaces like the Hardy spaces on the unit disk, Bergman spaces and so on, the reader is referred to see Hardy (Citation1956), Hung et al. (Citation2000) and Siskakis (Citation1987).

Let (hn k)n,kZ+ be an infinite matrix. For an analytic function f on unit disk D in the complex plane, consider the power series

H(f)(z) =n=0(k=0nhn kck)zn

and for transpose matrix of (hn k)n,kZ+, the power series

T(f)(z) =k=0(n=khn kck)zn

where f(z)=n=0cnzn.

It is natural to address the problem of finding the conditions on the coefficients or matrix, so that for an analytic function f, the series H(f)(z) and T(f)(z) defined and how the matrix induces as an operator on the corresponding domain.

For the Cesàro and Hankel matrix (hn k)n,k  Z+, numerous works are done on Hardy, Bergman spaces of the unit disk.

In this paper, we consider (hn kα)n,k  Z+ as generalized Hausdorff matrix, since it plays a significant part in summability theory for different cases of measure ϖ and α. In particular, for moment sequences, we obtain Cesàro, Euler, Riesz, Taylor, Holder matrices and so on as a special case of generalized Hausdorff matrix.

Generalized Hausdorff matrix: Let αR and ϖ be of bounded variation on (0,1]. For n,kZ+, we define

hn kα:={(n+αnk)01 tk+α(1t)nk(t)for 0kn,0otherwise.

The operator obtained from (hn k)n,k  Z+ and its transpose of the matrix (hn k)n,k  Z+ are nothing but generalized Hausdorff operator Hα and quasi Hausdorff operator Tα. In particular for α=0, we obtain Hausdorff matrix as a special case of generalized Hausdorff matrix.

P. Galanopoulos and A. G. Siskakis (Galanopoulos & Siskakis, Citation2001) studied Hausdorff operator H0 on the Hardy spaces of the unit disk and obtained the results in terms of composition operator. Later, P. Galanopoulos and M. Papadimitrakis (Galanopoulos & Papadimitrakis, Citation2006) considered Hausdorff and quasi Hausdorff matrices are act as an operator on the spaces of analytic functions on the unit disk D. Explicitly, they expressed the series in terms of integral as a composition function and addressed the problem on the Hardy spaces, Bergman spaces and Dirichlet space.

The action of the generalized Hardy-Cesàro operator on spaces of weighted integrable spaces have been studied by Pedersen (Pedersen, Citation2019). He briefly examined the boundedness and weakly compactness of an operator on the respective domain.

The aforementioned works motivate the study of generalised Hausdorff operator on Hardy spaces and using the integral representation of the operator in order to determine the condition on ϖ to corroborate the boundedness of the operator.

In section 2, we will examine the convergence of the power series Hα(f)(z), Tα(f)(z) and identify the relation between the series and composition function for the generalized Hausdorff and quasi Hausdorff operator.

In section 3 and 4, we investigate the action of the generalized Hausdorff operator and quasi Hausdorff operator on weighted spaces of integrable functions and determine the boundedness of the operator under certain conditions on weighted functions w1 and w2 on R+. Also, we address the problem for dual of the operators Hα and Tα on respective domain.

2. Integral representation of the generalized Hausdorff operator

Theorem 1.

Let (hn kα)n,k  Z+ be an generalized Hausdorff matrix and fHp(D) for 1p < . Then

  1. Hα(f)(z) is analytic on D.

  2. Hα(f) can be expressed as an integral form,

    (1) Hα(f)(z) =01tα[(t1)z+1]α+1f(tz1z(1t))(t),zD.(1)

Proof.

  1. Let f(z) =k=0ckzk,zD and An=k=0nhn kαck. Since Taylor coefficients of an analytic function fHp(D) are bounded by M > 0. Thus

    |An|=|k=0nhn kαck|M|k=0nhn kα|(0,1]ask=0n(n+αnk)tk+α(1t)nk  1

    which yields the radius of convergence for Hα(f)(z) is atleast 1. Hence Hα(f)(z) is an analytic function on the unit disk D.

  2. Consider

    Hα(f)(z)=n=0(k=0nhn kαck)zn=k=0n=k01(n+αnk)(1t)nkznkckzktk+α(t).

    For each t[0,1], the series n=k(n+αnk)(1t)nkznk converges uniformly to 1[1z(1t)]k+α+1. Hence, by interchanging the sum and integral in the above equation,

    Hα(f)(z)=k=0011[1z(1t)]k+α+1ckzktk+α(t)=01tα[(t1)z+1]α+1f(tz1z(1t))(t).

Theorem 2.

Let (hn kα)n,k  Z+ be an generalized Hausdorff matrix and fHp(D) for 1p < . Then

  1. Tα(f)(z) is analytic on D.

  2. Tα(f) can be expressed as an integral form,

    (2) Tα(f)(z) =01(tz+1t)αzαf(tz+1t)(t).(2)

Proof.

  1. Let f(z) =k=0ckzk,zD and Bk=n=khn kαcn. Then

    |Bk|=|n=khn kαcn|M|n=khn kα|MCϖ(0,1]asn=k(n+αnk)tk+α(1t)nk C, |cn|M

    which yields the radius of convergence for Tα(f)(z) is atleast 1. Hence Tα(f)(z) is an analytic on the unit disk D.

  2. Consider

    Tα(f)(z)=k=0(n=khn kαcn)zk=k=0(n=k01(n+αnk)n=k01(n+αnk)tk+α(1t)nk(t)cn)zk=n=0(k=0n01(n+αnk)k=0n01(n+αnk)tk+α(1t)nk(t)zk)cn=n=0(k+α=0n+α01(n+αn+α(k+α))k+α=0n+α01(n+αn+α(k+α))tk+α(1t)nk(t)zk)cn=n=001(tz+1t)n+αcn(t)zα

    Thus

    Tα(f)(z)=01(tz+1t)αzαf(tz+1t)(t).

3. Boundedness of the operator Hα on weighted integrable spaces

In Section 2, we obtained the integral representation of Hα(f)(z) and Tα(f)(z) on the Hardy spaces of unit disk. Using the representation, we will study the action of generalized Hausdorff and quasi Hausdorff operator on weighted spaces of integrable functions on R+. Let w1 be a non-negative continuous function on R+ and L1(w1) be a space of measurable functions f on R+ with

fL1(w1)=01|f(t)|w1(t)dt < .

Denote L(1w1) be a space of measurable functions f on R+ with

fL(1w1)=esssuptR+|f(t)|w1(t) < .

Let M(w1) be a space of locally finite, complex Borel measures ϖ on R+ with

ϖM(w)=0w(t)d|ϖ|(t).

In the following theorem, we find the necessary and sufficient condition on weighted functions w1 and w2 for the boundedness of generalized Hausdorff operator Hα on weighted integrable spaces on R+.

Theorem 3.

Let w1 and w2 be the non-negative weight functions on R+. The operator Hα is bounded linear operator from L1(w1) to L1(w2) iff

(3) xαxw2(y)yα+1dyC|1x|w1(x) a.e. on R+ for some C > 0.(3)

Proof.

Let fL1(w1) and assume the inequality holds a.e. on R+. Then

(4) 0xxαyα+1|1x||f(x)|w2(y)dydx=0|f(x)|xα|1x|xw2(y)yα+1dydxC0|f(x)|w1(x)dx(4)

by the assumptions on w1 and w2 in (Equation3). Note that

0|Hαf(y)|w2(y)dy=0|01tα[(t1)y+1]α+1f01tα[(t1)y+1]α+1(ty(t1)y+1)dt|w2(y)dy=0|0yxαyα+1(1x)f(x)dx|w2(y)dy00yxαyα+1|f(x)||1x|dxw2(y)dy0xxαyα+1|1x||f(x)|w2(y)dydxCfL1(w1),

obtained the inequality by using Fubini’s theorem and (Equation4). Thus Hα(f) is in L1(w2) and HαL1(w1)L1(w2)C for some C > 0. Conversely, assume Hα is bounded linear operator from L1(w1) to L1(w2). Let gC0(1w2), then by usual inner product with Hα(f), we obtain

(5) <g,Hα(f)>=0g(y)1yα+10yxα1xf(x)dxdy=0xg(y)yα+1xα1xdyf(x)dx=0xαw1(x)(1x)xg(y)yα+1dyf(x)w1(x)dx.(5)

Since L1(w2)M(w2) which is closed and identifyM(w2) is the dual of C0(1w2), then there exists a mapping ϖ:R+M(w2) such that <g,ϖ(x)> is measurable and bounded on R+, for every gC0(1w2) with Hα=esssupxR+ϖ(x)M(w2). Thus

(6) <g,Hα(f)>=0<g,ϖ(x)>f(x)w1(x)dx=00g(y)(x)(y)f(x)w1(x)dx.(6)

Equating (Equation5) and (Equation6), we obtain

0g(y)(x)(y)=xαw1(x)(1x)xg(y)yα+1dy a.e. on R+

for every gC0(1w2). As ϖ(x) is an element of M(w2), we get

(x)(y)=xαyα+1w1(x)(1x)χyxdz a.e. on R+

where χ is the characteristic function on the respective domain. Then

ϖ(x)L1(w2)=0w2(y)(x)(y)=0w2(y)xαyα+1w1(x)|1x|χyxdy=xαw1(x)|1x|xw2(y)yα+1dy.

By the last equality, we conclude the inequality (Equation3) holds a.e. on R+, if the operator Hα is bounded on weighted spaces of the integrable functions from L1(w1) to L1(w2).

Theorem 4.

Let Hα be a bounded linear operator from L1(w1) to L1(w2) such that the condition (Equation3) holds a.e. on R+. Then there exists an adjoint operator Hα:L(1w2)L(1w1) such that Hαg(x) =xα1xxg(y)yα+1dy a.e. on R+.

Proof.

For fL1(w1) and gL1(w2), we have

<Hα(f),g>=001tα[(t1)y+1]α+1f(ty(t1)y+1)dtg(y)dy=00yxαyα+1(1x)f(x)dxg(y)dy=0xxαyα+1(1x)f(x)g(y)dydx=<f,Hα(g)>

where Hαg(x)=xα1xxg(y)yα+1dy a.e. on R+. Thus Hα is an adjoint operator of Hα on L1(w1). Also, for gL(1w2), we have

|xα1xxg(y)yα+1dy|gL(1w2)xα|1x|xw2(y)yα+1dygL(1w2)w1(x) a.e. on R+

the last inequality obtained by the boundedness of Hα, which concludes the proof the theorem.

4. Boundedness of the operator Tα on weighted integrable spaces

Theorem 5.

Let w1 and w2 be the non-negative weight functions on R+. The operator Tα is bounded linear operator from L1(w1) to L1(w2) iff

(7) xα0w2(y)yα|1y|dyCw1(x) a.e. on R+ for some C > 0.(7)

Proof.

0|Tαf(y)|w2(y)dy=0|01(ty+1t)αyα01(ty+1t)αyαf(ty+1t)dt|w2(y)dy=0|1yxαyαf(x)dx1y|w2(y)dy01yxαyαf(x)dx|1y|w2(y)dy01xα(0x1yαw2(y)|1y|dy)|f(x)|dx+1xα(x1yαw2(y)|1y|dy)|f(x)|dxC01|f(x)|w1(x)dx+C1|f(x)|w1(x)dx

by the assumption (Equation7), we obtained Tα is bounded operator from L1(w1) to L1(w2). Conversely, assume Tα is bounded linear operator on the respective domain. Let gC0(1w2), then

(8) <g,Tα(f)>=0g(y)Tαf(y)dy=0g(y)1yα(1y)1yxαf(x)dxdy=(010x+1x)g(y)1yα(1y)xαf(x)dydx=01xα0xg(y)yα(1y)dyf(x)dx+1xαxg(y)yα(1y)dyf(x)dx=00K(x,y)g(y)dyf(x)w1(x)dx(8)

where

K(x,y)={xαw1(x)1yα(1y)χ0<y<x0 < x < 1,xαw1(x)1yα(1y)χx<y<1 < x < 

Similar to the steps as in Theorem 3, we obtain

(9) <g,Tα(f)>=00g(y)(x)(y)f(x)w1(x)dx(9)

for every gC0(1w2). Equating (Equation8) and (Equation9), we obtain

(10) 0g(y)(x)(y)=0g(y)K(x,y)dy(x)(y)=K(x,y) a.e. on R+.(10)

As ϖL1(w2), we have

xαw1(x)0xw2(y)yα(1y)dyC for 0  x < 1andxαw1(x)xw2(y)yα|1y|dyC for 1  x < 

from the notation of K(x,y), which concludes the proof of the theorem.

Theorem 6.

Let Tα be a bounded linear operator from L1(w1) to L1(w2) such that the condition xα0w2(y)yα|1y|dyw1(x) holds a.e. on R+. Then there exists an adjoint operator Tα:L(1w2)L(1w1) such that

Tαg(x)={xα0x1yα(y1)g(y)dyfor 0  x < 1,xαx1yα(y1)g(y)dyfor 1 x < .

Proof.

For fL1(w1) and gL1(w2), we have

<Tα(f),g>=0Tα(f)(y)g(y)dy=001(ty+1t)αyαf((t1)y+1)dtg(y)dy=01yxαyα(y1)f(x)dx g(y)dy=010xxαyα(y1)g(y)dyf(x)dx+1xxαyα(y1)g(y)dyf(x)dx=<f,Tαg>

where

Tαg(x)={xα0x1yα(y1)g(y)dy0  x < 1xαx1yα(y1)g(y)dy1  x < .

Thus Tα is an adjoint operator of Tα on L1(w1). Also, for gL(1w2) and 0  x < 1, we have

(11) |xα0xg(y)yα(y1)dy|gL(1w2)xα01w2(y)yα|1y|dygL(1w2)w1(x) a.e. on R+(11)

For 1x<, we have

(12) |xαxg(y)yα(y1)dy|gL(1w2)xαxw2(y)yα|1y|dygL(1w2)w1(x) a.e. on R+(12)

the last two inequalities (Equation11) and (Equation12) obtained by the boundedness of Tα.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Additional information

Funding

The work was supported by the VIT University.

References

  • Alexits, G. (1953). Sur la sommabilité des séries orthogonales. Acta Mathematica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae, 4(1953), 181–188. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02127579
  • Galanopoulos, P., & Papadimitrakis, M. (2006). Hausdorff and quasi-Hausdorff matrices on spaces of analytic functions, Canad. Canadian Journal of Mathematics, 58(3), 548–579. https://doi.org/10.4153/CJM-2006-023-5
  • Galanopoulos, P., & Siskakis, A. G. (2001). Hausdorff matrices and composition operators. Illinois Journal of Mathematics, 45(3), 757–773. https://doi.org/10.1215/ijm/1258138149
  • Hardy, G. H. (1920). Note on a theorem of Hilbert. Mathematische Zeitschrift, 6(3–4), 843–847. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01199965
  • Hardy, G. H. (1943). An inequality for Hausdorff means. Journal of the London Mathematical Society, s1-18(1), 46–50. https://doi.org/10.1112/jlms/s1-18.1.46
  • Hardy, G. H. (1956). Divergent series. Clarendon Press.
  • Hung, H. D., Ky, L. D., & Quang, T. T. (2000). The Hausdorff operator is bounded on the real hardy space ?¹(ℝ). Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, 128(5), 1391–1396. https://doi.org/10.1090/S0002-9939-99-05159-X
  • Hung, H. D., Ky, L. D., & Quang, T. T. (2006). Hausdorff operators on holomorphic hardy spaces and applications. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, 58(3), 584–579.
  • Kalaivani, K., & Madhu, V.(2024). On the newly generalized absolute summability of an orthogonal series with respect to Hausdorff Matrix. Trends in Mathematics, F2326, 267–273. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-37538-5_26
  • Kalaivani, K., & Youvaraj, G. P. (2013). Generalized absolute Hausdorff summability of orthogonal series, Acta. Acta Mathematica Hungarica, 186(1–2), 140–169. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10474-013-0313-0
  • Liflyand, E. (2013). Hausdorff operators on hardy spaces. Eurasian Mathematical Journal, 4(4), 101–141.
  • Pedersen, T. V. (2019). Generalized hardy–cesàro operators between weighted spaces. Glasgow Mathematical Journal, 61(1), 13–24. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0017089517000398
  • Siskakis, A. G. (1987). Composition semigroups and the Cesàro operator on Hp. Journal of the London Mathematical Society, 2(1), 153–164. https://doi.org/10.1112/jlms/s2-36.1.153