35
Views
10
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original

‘Kindling theory’ in arson: how dangerous are firesetters?

Pages 419-425 | Received 30 May 2003, Accepted 12 Jan 2004, Published online: 07 Aug 2009
 

Abstract

Objective: This article aims to review the literature on firesetters particularly looking at recidivism rates. The early literature described firesetters as dangerous individuals. This article reviews the more recent empirical data to examine if it supports the early literature.

Method: A literature review was performed examining papers which described firesetters with any reference to recidivism. These were divided into three broad categories based on where studies have been performed, namely in forensic psychiatric settings, the criminal justice system and general and psychiatric hospitals.

Results: The literature has been poorly focused and provides little help when assessing an individual firesetter. Risk factors associated with general criminology have been cited.

Conclusions: The empirical literature cannot support the hypothesis that firesetters are inherently dangerous. More research should target different groups of firesetters and examining individual risk within that group with an aim of researching treatment for the different groups.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

There are no offers available at the current time.

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.