45
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Pharmaceutical Analysis

Time‐Resolved Luminescence Screening Assay for Tetracyclines in Chicken Muscle

&
Pages 2067-2078 | Received 12 Mar 2004, Accepted 27 Apr 2004, Published online: 22 Aug 2007
 

Abstract

A time‐resolved luminescence (TRL) assay was developed for effective screening of tetracyclines in chicken muscle at the European Union (EU) maximum residue level of 100 ng g−1. The method involves extraction of the tetracyclines with McIlvaine–ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid (EDTA) buffer, centrifugation, solid‐phase extraction (SPE) clean‐up, formation of an Eu(III) complex, and then measurement of the TRL signal at 615 nm (excitation at 388 nm). Samples fortified with tetracycline (TC), oxytetracycline (OTC) or chlortetracycline (CTC) gave a linear response over the range of 0–1000 ng g−1, with relative sensitivities 5.4×, 2.4×, and 1×, respectively. Limits of detection for TC, OTC, and CTC were 3.5, 8, and 19 ng g−1, respectively. Examination of the least sensitive case, CTC, showed no overlap between the TRL of control chicken extracts and those that had been fortified with 100 ng g−1 CTC. The within‐day variation for these samples averaged 3.1% relative standard deviation (RSD), as did the day‐to‐day variation. The method was tested with blind control and fortified samples over the range of 20–500 ng g−1 CTC to illustrate its utility. Other veterinary drugs approved for chickens in the US (enrofloxacin, nicarbazin, tylosin) did not interfere. This method can provide a useful alternative to microbial screening assays for tetracyclines.

#Mention of trade names or commercial products in this article is solely for the purpose of providing specific information and does not imply recommendation or endorsement by the US Department of Agriculture.

Acknowledgments

Limei Yun and Susan Braden are thanked for technical assistance, and Steve Lehotay for helpful discussions. John Phillips is thanked for his assistance with the statistical analysis.

Notes

#Mention of trade names or commercial products in this article is solely for the purpose of providing specific information and does not imply recommendation or endorsement by the US Department of Agriculture.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 61.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 768.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.