167
Views
20
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Comparison Between Genetic Algorithm and Genetic Programming Approach for Modeling the Stress Distribution

, &
Pages 497-508 | Received 01 Apr 2004, Accepted 07 Sep 2004, Published online: 07 Feb 2007
 

ABSTRACT

This article compares genetic algorithm (GA) and genetic programming (GP) for system modeling in metal forming. As an example, the radial stress distribution in a cold-formed specimen (steel X6Cr13) was predicted by GA and GP. First, cylindrical workpieces were forward extruded and analyzed by the visioplasticity method. After each extrusion, the values of independent variables (radial position of measured stress node, axial position of measured stress node, and coefficient of friction) were collected. These variables influence the value of the dependent variable, radial stress. On the basis of training data, different prediction models for radial stress distribution were developed independently by GA and GP. The obtained models were tested with the testing data. The research has shown that both approaches are suitable for system modeling. However, if the relations between input and output variables are complex, the models developed by the GP approach are much more accurate.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 61.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 561.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.