Abstract
The purpose of the study was to examine validity of R. Thayer's activation model regarding 24 h variations of two subjective dimensions of activation (Energy and Tension), and their 24 h relations with indices of physiological activation and performance efficiency. The participants of the study (n = 28 females) spent 26 h under controlled laboratory conditions. Self-ratings of subjective activation and measurements of oral temperature, electrodermal activity, and performance on a visual vigilance task were done every 4 h. Twenty-four-hour variations were examined by means of repeated measures analyses of variance and by group mean cosinor analyses before and after controlling for the data trends. Self-ratings on both dimensions of subjective activation showed significant 24 h variation. Energy showed both nonrhythmic and endogenously determined circadian variation, while 24 h variation of tension was dominantly nonrhythmic and most probably determined by exogenous factors. Significant 24 h covariation was found between energy and body temperature. A negative correlation between 24 h variation of energy and tension was also found. Considering low and intermediate levels of subjective activation established over the 24 h in this study, the association of the two dimensions of subjective activation did not prove to be consistent with the assumptions of Thayer's model.