![Sample our Medicine, Dentistry, Nursing & Allied Health journals, sign in here to start your FREE access for 14 days]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/5944/TOC-Subject-Sample-2021-Medicine-Dentistry-Nursing-Allied-Health.jpg"})
Abstract
The effects of chronic treatment with losartan, an angiotensin II type 1 (AT1) receptor antagonist, and benazepril, an angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor, on target-organ damage and abnormal circadian blood pressure (BP) rhythm were compared in stroke-prone spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHRSP). Losartan and benazepril were given by intraperitoneal infusion for 3 weeks after 17 weeks of age to minimize any influence of their different pharmacokinetic properties. BP was continuously monitored by telemetrical method before treatment and at the end of the observation period. The left ventricular (LV) weight, 24-hour urinary albumin excretion (UalbV) and morphological changes in the kidney were observed. Losartan and benazepril (1, 3 and 10 mg/day) reduced BP and LV weight in a dose-dependent manner with good correlation between the effects. Losartan significantly improved UalbV in a dose-dependent manner, whereas benazepril was effective at only 10 mg/day. Renal morphological analysis showed that reduction of glomerulosclerosis and collagen fiber thickness was related to the effect on UalbV, but not to the antihypertensive effects. Losartan improved the shifted circadian BP rhythm towards the active phase in a dose-dependent manner, whereas the improvement caused by 1 and 3 mg/day of benazepril was less effective than the same dosage of losartan. These results suggest that both losartan and benazepril can reduce cardiac hypertrophy showing good correlation with their antihypertensive effects, but losartan, especially at a low dose, alleviates renal damage more effectively than benazepril, with its effect correlating well with improvement of the abnormal circadian BP rhythm in SHRSP. Thus, the protective effect against hypertensive target organ damage of the AT1 receptor antagonist seems to be more effective than that of ACE inhibitor.