92
Views
11
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

A Four-Year Study of Biomass Production of Eastern Gamagrass Grown on an Acid Compact Soil

, , , , , & show all
Pages 457-480 | Published online: 24 Jun 2011
 

Abstract

A field study was conducted from 1997 to 2000 to determine the biomass production of ‘Pete’ eastern gamagrass [Tripsacum dactyloides (L.) L.] grown on a restrictive (acid compact) soil on six unlimed sites located on the North Farm at the Beltsville Agricultural Research Center in Beltsville, MD. Total biomass from two cuttings in 1997, 1998, and 2000 averaged 4261, 4995, and 6611 kg ha−1, respectively, despite deficits in moisture during those years. A single cutting in July 1999 averaged 2288 kg ha−1. Overall biomass varied more than two-fold for the six sites. Significant differences in biomass were found among sites, years, and harvests. In general, biomass varied with position on the slope, bulk density, and depth of the topsoil, but not with pH. The average biomass was generally lowest at the top of the slope where the thickness of the Ap horizon was relatively thin and the soil was extremely acidic (pH 4.3–4.4) (1:1 soil–water). High silt content and low bulk density of the soil were associated with highest biomass; rainfall distribution also appeared to be important. Eastern gamagrass at Sites 4 to 6 at the top of the slope generally had a low pH (4.3–4.4), high penetrometer resistance, and high bulk density. Penetrometer readings were lower between rows than within rows at the 5 cm depth. There was no significant relationship between bulk density and penetrometer readings, but biomass appeared to be related to bulk density. Dry weight of roots was reduced by increasing bulk density (r2=0.57) and also reduced at depths below 15 cm. Despite adverse stress imposed by shallow top soil, low pH, high bulk density, and moisture deficits, eastern gamagrass produce relatively high biomass. These results demonstrate the resilience of eastern gamagrass to an acid compact soil and indicate that this species is suited for reclamation of acid compact soils and for producing high quality forage on marginal lands, when supplied with adequate NPK.

Acknowledgments

The research was partly funded by USDA CSREES Competitive Grant No. 97-36200-5235 awarded to Donald Krizek as Principal Investigator. We thank ARS staff members Miguel McCloud and James Cline for help in maintaining the experimental plots, Roman Mirecki for photographic and statistical assistance, and Prof. Ray Weil, Department of Natural Resource Sciences and Landscape Architecture, University of Maryland, College Park, for his assistance in soil analyses.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 61.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 408.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.