32
Views
109
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Ventricular Function

Impact of Papillary Muscles in Ventricular Volume and Ejection Fraction Assessment by Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance

, M.D., , , , M.D. & , M.D.
Pages 9-16 | Received 05 Feb 2003, Accepted 13 Jul 2003, Published online: 24 Aug 2009
 

Abstract

Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) is an accurate tool for the determination of right and left ventricular volumes and ejection fractions. However, the current standard short‐axis technique is time‐consuming and thus, often not practicable for routine daily use, because papillary muscles and trabeculations have to be marked and their volumes subtracted from the total ventricular volume. To reduce calculation time we evaluated the volumetric data that included papillary muscle and trabecular volumes and compared the outcome with the results of the standard technique. Thirty patients (17 healthy, 13 with coronary heart disease) were examined by CMR using TrueFISP (Magnetom, Siemens, Erlangen, Germany). Right and left ventricular volumes and ejection fractions were calculated using the standard short‐axis technique and then again without subtracting papillary and trabecular volumes. The two methods were compared by determining the differences in results for ventricular volumes and ejection fractions. Statistically significant differences were found between the two methods for right and left ventricular stroke volumes and end‐systolic volumes, and left ventricular end‐diastolic volumes (EDV) (p ≤ 0.011). No significant difference was found for right ventricular end‐diastolic volumes (p ≥ 0.149) or left or right ventricular ejection fraction (p ≥ 0.130). Except in the case of left ventricular EDV, the deviations in the results of method 1 and method 2 did not vary significantly with the presence or absence of heart disease. Measurements were obtained considerably more quickly with the modified method than with the standard short‐axis method (25 ± 4 min vs. 13 ± 3 min, p = 0.000). Although systematic differences were found when papillary and trabecular volumes were not subtracted, these differences are small and may not be of clinical relevance in healthy subjects or patients with coronary heart disease. Not subtracting the volumes of these structures enables faster determination of right and left ventricular volumes and ejection fractions without loss of the accuracy associated with the standard short‐axis technique.

Abbreviations
LV:=

left ventricular

RV:=

qright ventricular

EDV:=

end‐diastolic volume

ESV:=

end‐systolic volume

SV:=

stroke volume

EF:=

ejection fraction

Mean:=

mean value

SD:=

standard deviation

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

There are no offers available at the current time.

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.