Methodology and Problems of Protein‐Ligand Docking: Case Study of Dihydroorotate Dehydrogenase, Thymidine Kinase, and Phosphodiesterase 4

Abstract

The docking methodology was applied to three different therapeutically interesting enzymes: human dihydroorotate dehydrogenase (DHODH), Herpes simplex virus type I thymidine kinase (HSV1 TK) and human phosphodiesterase 4 (PDE4). Programs FlexX, AutoDock and DOCK where used. The three targets represent three distinct cases. For DHODH and HSV1 TK, the binding modes of substrate and inhibitors within the active site are known, while the binding orientation of cAMP within PDE4 has been solely hypothesized. Active site of DHODH is mainly hydrophobic and the binding mode of the inhibitor brequinar was used as a template for evaluating the docking strategies. The presence of cofactors revealed to be crucial for the definition of the docking site. The HSV1 TK active site is small and polar and contains crystal water molecules and ATP. Docking of thymidine and aciclovir (ACV) within the active site was analyzed by keeping or removing water molecules. It showed the crucial role of water in predicting the binding of pyrimidines and purines. The crystal structure of PDE4 contains magnesium and zinc cations as well as catalytic water molecule but no ligand. Several docking experiments of cAMP and rolipram were performed and the results showed clear‐cut dependence between the ligand orientation and the presence of metals in the active site. All three cases show specific problems of the docking methodology, depending on the character of the active site.

Key Words: :

• Molecular docking
• Virtual screening
• Cofactor
• Leflunomide
• Aciclovir
• Rolipram