86
Views
26
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Scientific Section

In vivo evaluation of two new moisture-resistant orthodontic adhesive systems: a comparative clinical trial

, , &
Pages 139-147 | Received 09 Apr 2002, Accepted 05 Nov 2002, Published online: 16 Dec 2014
 

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate and compare the clinical performance of two new moisture-resistant orthodontic adhesive systems: a chemically-cured composite resin (Unite, 3M Unitek, Monrovia, California, USA) in conjunction with a special moisture-resistant primer (Transbond MIP, 3M Unitek, Monrovia, California, USA); and a fluoride-releasing light-cured compomer (Assure, Reliance Orthodontic Products, Inc., Itasca, Illinois, USA).

Design: Randomized controlled clinical trial using the ‘split-mouth’ technique.

Setting: Department of Orthodontics, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki.

Subjects (Materials) and Methods: Twenty-five consecutively started patients (13 females and 12 males) requiring fixed appliance orthodontic treatment.

Interventions: Four-hundred-and-thirty-six stainless steel brackets bonded to all teeth except molars using two different moisture-resistant orthodontic adhesive systems.

Main outcome measures: Bond failure rates during a period of 9 months were estimated for each adhesive system and the corresponding bracket survival curves were plotted using the Kaplan– Meier product-limit estimate. Bracket survival distributions with respect to adhesive material, tooth location, patient’s gender and operator, were then compared by means of a log-rank test. Bond failure interface was determined using the Adhesive Remnant Index.

Results: Assure recorded a higher bond failure rate (13.8 per cent) than Unite & MIP (7.3 per cent). The corresponding bracket survival curves were found to be significantly different (P < 0.05). Premolars exhibited higher bond failures than incisors and canines (P < 0.001), while half (49.8 per cent) of the total bond failures occurred during the first 2 months of treatment. The predominant mode of failure was within the bonding material.

Conclusion: The new moisture-resistant adhesive systems under study were found to be clinically efficient, though Assure exhibited a significantly higher bond failure rate than Unite and Transbond MIP. The higher frequency of adhesive failures observed with Assure might indicate a possible weak point at the adhesive-bracket interface.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

There are no offers available at the current time.

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.