Abstract
Objective
Despite advances in the treatment of people with severe mental illness (SMI), access to work for this community still remains a challenge. Cognitive remediation (CR) is an intervention that can improve employment outcomes, especially when offered alongside employment support. This pilot study aimed to determine whether CR enhances vocational outcomes for job seekers participating in an innovative vocationally oriented psycho‐educational program implemented in Australia.
Method
Fourteen participants with SMI were enrolled in Health Optimisation Program for Employment (HOPE) and attended 20 sessions of CR. Assessments were performed at baseline, post‐CR, and 3 months follow‐up. Individuals were assessed on a number of occupational and psychosocial variables (e.g., hours of paid and unpaid work, self‐esteem, quality of life, social relationships), in addition to undertaking the MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery.
Results
There was no increase in hours of paid work for those in employment, but 46% of the group initiated tertiary studies between baseline and 3‐month follow‐up. There was a trend towards a significant increase in number of volunteer hours, with 31% of individuals having initiated a non‐paid activity at the end of the CR. As predicted, cognition improved over time as did psychosocial outcomes in the areas of self‐esteem, quality of life and social relationships.
Conclusions
Consistent with previous studies, CR improved psychosocial and cognitive functioning. While employment benefits were not found, promising outcomes were reported on volunteering and educational participation. This pilot suggests there may be potential for combining CR with HOPE to enhance vocation‐related participation and potential employability of job seekers with SMI in Australia. Given these preliminary findings, a further clinical trial with appropriate control group and sample size is required to validate the effectiveness of HOPE+CR.
Acknowledgements
The authors wish to express their deepest gratitude to all the participants who committed to this research. In addition, thanks to Dr Erica Neill (EN) who assisted with participant assessments. This study was supported by Monash University funding scheme for PhD students which funded Natalia Contreras. The authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the paper. All authors have contributed significantly, have reviewed the manuscript, and are in agreement with submission of the manuscript. Relevant codes of ethics and research ethics were upheld through the conduct of this research.