Longitudinal associations between fathers' mental health and the quality of their coparenting relationships

Abstract

Background

Although the body of research on fathers' mental health is growing, very few studies have explored the relationship between paternal mental health and coparenting. Coparenting is a construct that links different family subsystems, and refers to the ways in which parental figures relate to one another in their roles as parents.

Methods

This study used data from 4,933 families to explore the relationship between co‐resident fathers' mental health and the quality of their coparenting relationships, based on a limited set of coparenting items but utilising both fathers' and mothers' reports from three waves of the nationally representative Longitudinal Study of Australian Children.

Results

Results indicated an association between fathers' mental health and the quality of their coparenting relationships, after controlling for variables such as parental relationship happiness, father involvement, and maternal mental health. Fathers who reported mild or serious psychological distress were more likely to report lower quality coparenting relationships. Furthermore, fathers' and mothers' reports of the coparental relationship were broadly comparable, indicating that the association between fathers' mental health and coparenting quality could not be attributed entirely to the negative effect of mental distress on fathers' appraisals of their own coparenting.

Conclusions

These findings suggest that it may be advantageous to develop clinical interventions that focus specifically on engendering coparenting skills in families where the father has mental health concerns.

Abstract

Key words:

• coparenting
• couple relationship
• fathers
• longitudinal study
• mental illness

Funding: None.

Conflict of interest: None.

Funding: None.

Conflict of interest: None.

Acknowledgements

This study uses data from the Longitudinal Study of Australian Children (LSAC). LSAC is conducted by the Department of Social Services (DSS), the Australian Institute of Family Studies (AIFS), and the Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS). The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and may not reflect the views of the Australian Institute of Family Studies or the Australian Government.

Notes

Funding: None.

Conflict of interest: None.