Abstract
Background
Contemporary scholarship has established that increasing numbers of men are experiencing body dissatisfaction. However, as a consequence of the enduring assumption that body dissatisfaction is a feminine domain, male body dissatisfaction is associated with considerable stigma.
Objective
The current study aimed to explore and describe men's experience with body dissatisfaction and investigate sociocultural influences in the context of male body image. Of particular interest was to obtain, from men, perceptions of stigma and gender bias relating to male body dissatisfaction.
Methods
Seven focus groups were conducted with a total of 40 Australian male university students, aged between 17 and 53-years (M = 20.40; SD = 6.31). To analyse the data, two independent raters adhered to Braun and Clarke's (Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77–101, 2006) protocol for thematic analysis.
Results
Seven themes were identified: (a) body dissatisfaction is less dangerous for men compared with women, (b) lack of representation of male body dissatisfaction in the media, (c) friendship group norms influence appearance investment, (d) steroids as dangerous and socially undesirable, (e) muscles signal dedication, but not intellect, (f) masculine norms obstruct disclosure of body dissatisfaction, and (g) professional help as a last resort.
Conclusions
Participants' responses illustrate the importance of gender norms in the context of male body image, highlight the influence of peers on appearance investment, and reflect that appearance concerns and emotional expression continue to be associated with femininity (and thus, are undesirable for men).
This study is part of research conducted in fulfilment of the requirements of the Doctor of Philosophy program, undertaken by Beth O'Gorman at the University of Queensland. This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not‐for‐profit sectors.
This study is part of research conducted in fulfilment of the requirements of the Doctor of Philosophy program, undertaken by Beth O'Gorman at the University of Queensland. This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not‐for‐profit sectors.
Notes
This study is part of research conducted in fulfilment of the requirements of the Doctor of Philosophy program, undertaken by Beth O'Gorman at the University of Queensland. This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not‐for‐profit sectors.