910
Views
9
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

“Guys don't talk about their bodies”: A qualitative investigation of male body dissatisfaction and sociocultural influences in a sample of 40 Australian males

, , &
Pages 123-132 | Received 26 May 2019, Accepted 06 Aug 2019, Published online: 11 Mar 2021
 

Abstract

Background

Contemporary scholarship has established that increasing numbers of men are experiencing body dissatisfaction. However, as a consequence of the enduring assumption that body dissatisfaction is a feminine domain, male body dissatisfaction is associated with considerable stigma.

Objective

The current study aimed to explore and describe men's experience with body dissatisfaction and investigate sociocultural influences in the context of male body image. Of particular interest was to obtain, from men, perceptions of stigma and gender bias relating to male body dissatisfaction.

Methods

Seven focus groups were conducted with a total of 40 Australian male university students, aged between 17 and 53-years (M = 20.40; SD = 6.31). To analyse the data, two independent raters adhered to Braun and Clarke's (Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77–101, 2006) protocol for thematic analysis.

Results

Seven themes were identified: (a) body dissatisfaction is less dangerous for men compared with women, (b) lack of representation of male body dissatisfaction in the media, (c) friendship group norms influence appearance investment, (d) steroids as dangerous and socially undesirable, (e) muscles signal dedication, but not intellect, (f) masculine norms obstruct disclosure of body dissatisfaction, and (g) professional help as a last resort.

Conclusions

Participants' responses illustrate the importance of gender norms in the context of male body image, highlight the influence of peers on appearance investment, and reflect that appearance concerns and emotional expression continue to be associated with femininity (and thus, are undesirable for men).

This study is part of research conducted in fulfilment of the requirements of the Doctor of Philosophy program, undertaken by Beth O'Gorman at the University of Queensland. This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not‐for‐profit sectors.

This study is part of research conducted in fulfilment of the requirements of the Doctor of Philosophy program, undertaken by Beth O'Gorman at the University of Queensland. This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not‐for‐profit sectors.

Notes

This study is part of research conducted in fulfilment of the requirements of the Doctor of Philosophy program, undertaken by Beth O'Gorman at the University of Queensland. This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not‐for‐profit sectors.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 169.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.