48
Views
12
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Paper

Retinal tissue thickness in type 1 and type 2 diabetes

, PhD, , PhD FAAO, , PhD, , PhD, , PhD, , PhD MBBS, , PhD MBChB FRCP & , AC PhD DSc show all
Pages 78-83 | Received 19 Feb 2015, Accepted 26 Apr 2015, Published online: 15 Apr 2021
 

Abstract

Background

The objective was to investigate full retinal and inner retinal thickness in individuals with type 1 and type 2 diabetes.

Methods

Eighty‐four individuals with type 1 diabetes (T1DM), 67 individuals with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) and 42 non‐diabetic individuals (control group) were enrolled. Participants underwent full retinal thickness evaluation in the central retinal, parafoveal and perifoveal zones and in the retinal nerve fibre layer (RNFL) and ganglion cell complex (GCC), using spectral domain optical coherence tomography. As a preliminary step, the key variables of interest – age, sex, diabetic retinopathy (DR), duration of diabetes and HbA1c levels – were analysed and compared between the three groups. Full retinal thickness, RNFL and GCC thicknesses were also compared between the groups. The relationship between the type of diabetes and retinal tissue thickness was explored, adjusting for the five potential confounders.

Results

Compared to individuals with T1DM, individuals with T2DM had significantly reduced full retinal thickness in the parafovea and perifovea and reduced RNFL and GCC thickness. The mean differences were six (p = 0.020), seven (p = 0.008), six (p = 0.021) and four micrometres (p = 0.013) for the parafovea, perifovea, RNFL and GCC thicknesses, respectively. Thicknesses within the central zone (p = 0.018) and at the parafovea (p = 0.007) were significantly reduced in T2DM when compared to the control group. After adjusting for age, sex, diabetic retinopathy, duration of diabetes and HbA1c levels, the relationship between type of diabetes and retinal tissue thickness was not statistically significant (p > 0.056).

Conclusion

Retinal tissue thickness is not significantly different between type 1 and type 2 diabetes, when adjusted for age, sex, diabetic retinopathy, duration of diabetes and HbA1c levels.

Acknowledgement

Supported by Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation International (27‐2007‐878 and 8‐2008‐362) and National Health and Medical Research Council (Australia) (497230).

Additional information

Funding

Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation International
National Health and Medical Research Council (Australia)

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

Purchase Issue

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 84.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.