Abstract
Background
The aim was to assess the symmetry and magnitude of illumination‐dependent centroid shift and of post‐photic flash re‐dilatation response for normal pupils.
Methods
This cross‐sectional, observational, inter‐eye comparative study was performed at a specialty hospital. Fifty eyes (25 volunteers) without any ocular abnormality underwent pupillometry for scotopic (0.4 lux), mesopic (4.0 lux), photopic conditions (40 lux) and for rate of pupillary re‐dilatation after a photopic flash (500 lux) with an inbuilt pupillometer on a Scheimpflug device (Sirius, CSO, Italy). Main outcome measures were pupillary centroids at different illuminations and time‐dependent pupil diameters after a photic flash response.
Results
The mean pupil size for scotopic, photopic and mesopic pupils were significantly different (p < 0.001, ANOVA) for right and left eyes, analysed separately. The post‐photic flash re‐dilatation diameter was measured at zero, one, two, four, six, eight and 10 seconds after the flash. The mean diameters at given times post‐photic flash were comparable in fellow eyes (p > 0.5, t‐test) and highly correlated (r ≥ 0.8, p < 0.05 at all timed comparisons). The mean pupil diameter followed a time‐dependent cubic function for both the right and left eyes. Speed was also governed by a time‐dependent cubic function for both the right and the left eyes.
Conclusions
Fellow eye symmetry is seen in illumination‐governed centroid shifts and the post‐flash re‐dilatation response. The pupil dilates back briskly with a time‐dependent cubic function, which is similar for fellow eyes in normal patients.
Key words:
Acknowledgements
The authors acknowledge the kind support from Dr Giacomo Savini, GB Bietti Foundation IRCCS, Rome, Italy, regarding procurement of technical information used in the study. The technical specifications of the illumination stimulus for the inbuilt pupillometer were kindly provided by engineers Francesco Versaci & Gabriele Vestri, Costruzione Strumenti Oftalmici, CSO, Italy (personal communication via email dated 07.04.2015). The authors also thank and acknowledge both for their prompt help.