Intense pulsed light treatment and meibomian gland expression for moderate to advanced meibomian gland dysfunction

Abstract

Background

The aim was to evaluate the efficacy of periocular intense pulsed light therapy combined with meibomian gland expression for chronic dry eye due to moderate to advanced meibomian gland dysfunction.

Methods

This single‐institution, open‐label prospective study involved 26 participants who received bilateral treatments using a proprietary intense pulsed light device (E > Eye, E‐Swin, Paris, France) combined with therapeutic meibomian gland expression at baseline, Week 2 and Week 6. Clinical evaluations performed at baseline, Week 4, Week 8 and Week 12 were symptom scores (Ocular Surface Disease Index [OSDI], Ocular Comfort Index [OCI], daily lubricant use, tear break‐up time and ocular surface staining). Tear secretion, tear osmolarity, InflammaDry tear immunoassay, corneal sensation, meibomian secretion quality and expressibility, bulbar conjunctival, limbal and lid margin redness and eyelid margin bacterial swab for cultures and colony counts were performed at baseline and Week 8 only.

Results

Significant improvements occurred at Week 8 in meibomian gland expressibility (p = 0.002), meibum quality (p = 0.006), tear break‐up time (p = 0.002), corneal staining (p = 0.001), lid margin redness (p = 0.001), bulbar redness (p = 0.05) and limbal redness (p = 0.001). Symptom survey outcomes, eyelid margin bacteria colony counts, Schirmer I test, tear osmolarity, corneal sensitivity and daily lubricant use were unchanged. At Week 12, significant improvements in symptoms (OSDI p = 0.025; OCI p = 0.003), tear break‐up time (p = 0.001) and corneal staining (p = 0.001) occurred. Improvement in OSDI score was correlated to the improvement in ocular surface staining (R = 0.43, p = 0.03) and associated with baseline meibomian gland expressibility (Kendall tau: the distributions are ordered the same, p = 0.1). There were no adverse effects of treatment.

Conclusions

Serial intense pulsed light therapy combined with meibomian gland expression significantly improved dry eye symptoms and clinical signs, including meibomian gland secretion quality and expressibility and ocular surface inflammation. Treatment effects were cumulative and sustained for at least six weeks after the final treatment.

Key words:

• dry eye
• intense pulsed light therapy
• lid margin flora
• meibomian gland dysfunction
• meibomian gland expression
• ocular surface
• tear film

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

The authors would like to thank France Medical for supplying the intense pulsed light machine used in this study.