Arctic‐alpine vegetation biomass is driven by fine‐scale abiotic heterogeneity

Abstract

During recent decades large changes in vegetation biomass have been observed in arctic and alpine areas. While these temporal trends have been clearly linked to changing climatic conditions, the drivers of local spatial variation in biomass are still relatively poorly understood. Thus, we examine the effects of abiotic conditions (topography, soil properties and geomorphological processes) on aboveground vascular plant biomass to understand the determinants of contemporary fine‐scale heterogeneity in this variable. We also compare the results from clip‐harvested biomass samples to three non‐destructive biomass estimates: vegetation cover, height and volume. To investigate the local drivers of biomass we analysed an extensive dataset of 960 1‐m² cells in arctic–alpine tundra using spatially explicit generalized estimation equations to conduct variation partitioning. The abiotic environment had a clear impact on the distribution of biomass (variance explained 32.89%). Soil properties were most strongly related to aboveground biomass (independent effect in variation partitioning 7.03% and combined effect including joined effects 19.6%). Topography had only little influence after soil and geomorphology were taken into account (independent effect 2.23%, combined effect 18.73%), implying that topography affects biomass only indirectly. Of the non‐destructive biomass estimates, the results for vegetation volume were most similar to those for biomass samples. Thus, we recommend utilizing vegetation volume as a cost‐efficient and robust biomass estimate in arctic‐alpine areas. Our results indicate that the fine‐scale environmental variation has to be taken into account more carefully when modelling vegetation biomass, especially under changing climatic conditions.

Key words:

• arctic‐alpine
• biomass
• clip‐harvesting
• topography
• vegetation volume

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge funding from the Academy of Finland (Project Number 1140873), and thank A. Kulonen, H. Mod and A. Niskanen for helping collect the data and J. Virkanen for soil analyses. We also thank two anonymous referees for their useful comments.

Additional information

Notes on contributors

Susanne Suvanto

Susanne Suvanto, Vantaa Research Unit, Finnish Forest Research Institute, PO Box 18, 01301 Vantaa, Finland

Email: [email protected]

Peter C. Le roux

Peter C. le Roux, Department of Plant Science, University of Pretoria, 0028, Pretoria, South Africa

Email: [email protected]

Miska Luoto

Miska Luoto, Department of Geosciences and Geography, University of Helsinki, PO Box 64, FI‐00014 University of Helsinki, Finland

Email: [email protected]