604
Views
17
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Pages 191-215 | Published online: 19 Nov 2019
 

Abstract

This study investigates differences in the diversity of cooperation partners used for innovation‐related activities (i.e., search breadth) between family and nonfamily small and medium‐sized enterprises (SMEs), as well as within the group of family SMEs. The results generally confirm our hypotheses derived from the behavioral theory of the firm. Specifically, we show that family SMEs have a lower search breadth than their nonfamily counterparts. Our findings further illustrate how attributes of the CEO (level of education) and the top management team (nonfamily management involvement and educational background diversity) relate to the search breadth of family SMEs.

Notes

1 The objective to innovate was measured on a five‐point Likert scale asking how important the objective to innovate was for a firm. Firms were categorized as having the objective to innovate if they indicated a 4 or a 5 for this item.

2 Based on the official Eurostat (Citation2010) classification, firms were categorized as low‐, medium‐, or high‐technology firms according to their NACE (European industrial activity classification) codes.

3 We also ran additional tests controlling for potential generational differences among family SMEs. We did not find a significant direct relationship between the generational stage and search breadth, nor did the inclusion affect any of our remaining relationships of interest.

4 Product/process innovation was measured by means of five/three Likert‐scale items adapted from Zahra et al. (Citation2000); Cronbach's alpha was 0.80/0.87.

5 The educational attainment of the CEO may also be relevant for the search breadth of nonfamily firms. Testing the same relationship in the subsample of nonfamily SMEs (n = 85), however, did not reveal a significant effect.

6 As the degree of educational background diversity within the TMT could also be relevant for the search breadth of nonfamily SMEs, we tested this relationship among the group of nonfamily SMEs (n = 85). Here we do observe a positive and significant effect (b = 0.35; p < .05).

Additional information

Notes on contributors

Nicolas Classen

Nicolas Classen is a PhD candidate in the School of Business and Economics, Department of Organization & Strategy at Maastricht University.

Anita Van gils

Anita Van Gils is associate professor in the School of Business and Economics, Department of Organization & Strategy at Maastricht University.

Yannick Bammens

Yannick Bammens is assistant professor in the School of Business and Economics, Department of Organization & Strategy at Maastricht University.

Martin Carree

Martin Carree is full professor in the School of Business and Economics, Department of Organization & Strategy at Maastricht University.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 153.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.