3,169
Views
124
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original article

Methane emissions from five paddy fields with different amounts of rice straw application in central Hokkaido, Japan

, , &
Pages 95-101 | Received 31 May 2006, Accepted 16 Sep 2006, Published online: 17 Dec 2010

Abstract

Rice paddy fields are a major source of methane (CH4) emissions, a potent greenhouse gas. We assessed CH4 emissions from five existing paddy fields farmed in a snowy temperate region in central Hokkaido, Japan. All fields had continuous flooding and a paddy–fallow–paddy (rice) crop rotation system, but with different amounts of rice straw application. The rice straw application rate in the fields ranged from 0 to 219 g dry matter m−2. CH4 emission increased with increasing amounts of rice straw. A peak in CH4 emission at the end of the reproductive stage was observed in all fields receiving rice straw. When continuous flooding was interrupted by drainage for harvesting, emissions from all fields also dropped quickly. Total CH4 emissions ranged from 4.04 to 40.8 g CH4-C m−2 per growing season. We found that CH4 emissions (g CH4-C m−2 per g dry matter) as per unit (dry matter) of rice straw applied in this study were significantly (P < 0.05) higher than those of calculated reported values, presumably because of the retardation of straw decomposition rates during the winter fallow. There was a significant correlation between rice straw carbon application (SCA) rate and total CH4 emission in continuously flooded fields (CH4 emission [g C m−2 per growing period] = 0.486 × SCA [g C m−2] − 1.644, r 2 = 0.884, P < 0.05), and emissions were 2–10-fold greater than from fields with no rice straw. The results indicate that the presence of rice straw has a significant influence on CH4 emissions from paddy fields.

INTRODUCTION

Rice farming is now believed to be the leading anthropogenic source of methane (CH4) (CitationJacobson 2005). CH4 is an important greenhouse gas, with a 23-fold higher global warming potential (GWP) than carbon dioxide (CO2) over a 100-year time horizon (CitationIntergovernmental Panel on Climate Change 2001). CH4 has been reported to account for 95% of total CO2-equivalent emissions from paddy fields (CitationNaser et al. 2005). Recent studies have reported global annual CH4 emissions from paddy fields to be 53 Tg CH4 (CitationCao et al. 1998), 25–54 Tg CH4 (CitationMosier et al. 1998) and 33–49 Tg CH4 (CitationNeue and Sass 1998), accounting for 4–9% of the total emission of 598 Tg CH4 (CitationIntergovernmental Panel on Climate Change 2001). This amount would be required to be reduced stabilizing the concentration of atmospheric CH4 for (CitationIntergovernmental Panel on Climate Change 1990; Citation1992). Irrigated rice is one of the few major CH4 sources that is manageable and is, therefore, likely to be a critical focus of mitigation efforts (CitationSass and Fisher 1997).

CH4 emissions from paddy fields are regulated by a complex set of biogeochemical characteristics in flooded soils, and are influenced by agricultural management practices (CitationNeue 1997; CitationNeue et al. 1990; CitationSass et al. 1992; CitationWassmann et al. 2000b; CitationYagi et al. 1996). It has also been reported that the addition of plant residues/straw to highly reduced soils enhances CH4 emissions (CitationBossio et al. 1999; CitationCicerone et al. 1992; CitationLiou et al. 2003; CitationSass et al. 1991; CitationWassmann et al. 1996a; CitationYagi and Minami 1990). Using experimental data collected from different areas of the world, CitationDenier van der Gon and Neue (1995) have developed a relationship between CH4 emissions and added organic matter.

Table 1 Some physical and chemical characteristics of the investigated paddy field soils (0–10 cm depth) in Mikasa, central Hokkaido, Japan

The practice in central Hokkaido is, in general, to leave rice straw on paddy fields after harvest in autumn and to incorporate the straw into the soil in the following spring by plowing. Rice straw is also applied on purpose as an organic fertilizer (CitationWatanabe et al. 1995). Central Hokkaido has a cold climate with a long period of snow cover from late November to early April. During the winter fallow (October to April), rice straw is generally left on the unplowed, snow-covered fields. Information is lacking on the release of CH4 during the rice growing period under these conditions, that is, variations in agricultural management, decomposing organic materials and a temperate snowy climate. Thus, field investigations were carried out to assess the CH4 emissions from paddy fields of central Hokkaido under continuously flooding conditions, with an emphasis on rice straw management practices.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Site description and field management schemes

Field investigations were carried out from May to September 2004 at Mikasa (43°14′ N, 141°49′ E), located in central Hokkaido, a major rice growing area of Japan. We selected five fields, giving emphasis to the influence of added carbon (C) in the form of rice straw under continuous flooding conditions. The fields in Mikasa contained various types of mineral soils (Gray Lowland soil, Gley Lowland soil with burying peat, Pseudogleys and Brown Lowland soil). All of the fields were managed under single cropping in annual and had a paddy–fallow–paddy crop rotation system. Combine harvesters left short pieces of rice straw on the soil surface as spreading, which was incorporated into the soil the following spring (early May). We observed that a variable amount of rice straw was leftover on the fields. Differences in the amount of rice straw left on the fields from the previous year's rice crop resulted from ease of removal. Part or all of the rice straw of previous crops was taken out from the fields and used as bedding materials or feed for livestock. Around Mikasa, there are livestock farms and rice paddy farmers carried out rice straw to sell to livestock farmers, but left some rice straw when rainfall made transport difficult. Rice straw was present on fields S2 to S5 in differing amounts, while field S1 served as a no rice straw control. All fields were continuously flooded. All fields were drained for harvest at the end of the growing season. Physical and chemical properties of the studied fields are presented in . Detailed information on the amount of straw on the fields and other management practices are presented in .

CH4 emission determination

A closed-chamber method (CitationYagi et al. 1991) was used to collect gas from the experimental fields. Immediately after transplantation, four plastic plates (the base of a gas chamber) were installed in the waterlogged soil for the chambers to be set on. Transparent, rectangular gas-sampling chambers (60 cm × 30 cm × 100 cm) were constructed using 5-mm-thick acrylic sheets and placed over the rice plants, covering four hills in the paddy fields in each chamber site. To allow pressure adjustments in the chamber during gas sampling, a lightweight plastic bag was affixed inside. To measure the inside temperature, a digital thermometer was attached inside the chamber. A silicon tube with a three-way stopcock was also attached to each chamber for gas sampling. To avoid soil disturbance during gas collection, all observations were made from boardwalks, which were constructed across each sampling site. Sampling was carried out between 10:00 to 15:00 hours. For each field, sampling was replicated at three sites. At each sampling time, gas was sampled at 0, 10 and 20 min using a 25 mL polypropylene syringe and transferred into a 20 mL vacuum glass vial. CH4 concentrations in the collected samples were analyzed using a gas chromatograph equipped with a flame ionization detector (GC-8A, Shimadzu Corporation, Kyoto, Japan). Soil temperature was also measured at a depth of 3 cm.

Table 2 Summary of management practices for paddy fields in Mikasa, central Hokkaido, Japan

CH4 emissions were calculated from the increase or decrease of gas concentration in the gas-sampling chamber over time using the following equation:

where F is the gas emission; ρ is the density of gas at the standard condition (CH4 = 0.716 kg m−3); V (m3) and A (m2) are the volume and bottom area of the chamber, respectively; Δc/Δt (10−6 m3 m−3 h−1) is the gas concentration change in the chamber during a given period; T is the absolute temperature (K); and α is the conversion factor for CH4 to C (12/16). Negative values indicate CH4 uptake from the atmosphere. Total CH4 emission during the cropping season was calculated by successive linear interpolation of average gas emissions on the sampling days, assuming that gas emissions followed a linear trend during the periods when no sample was taken:

where, Ri is the mean gas emission (mg m−2 day−1) of the two sampling times, Di is the number of days in the sampling interval, and n is the number of sampling times.

Soil and plant sample analysis

Initial soils from 0–10 cm depth in each field were sampled using a stainless steel auger, air dried for more than 3 weeks in the laboratory, and then passed through a 2 mm sieve to remove coarse materials. Particle size distributions were measured using the pipette method. Soil pH was measured using a glass electrode pH meter (HORIBA pH meter F-8, Kyoto, Japan) in a supernatant suspension of 1:2.5 soil : water mixture. To record the amounts of residues from the previous year's crop, rice straw for each field was collected by hand from three 1-m2 quadrats and dried in an oven at 70°C for 3 days. Straw was considered as the above ground harvested parts of the rice plant excluding grain; however, intact stubble 2–3 cm was not considered. Dried soil and plant samples from each field were ground by hand with a mortar and pestle to determine total carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) concentrations with a C–N analyzer (vario MAX CNS, Elemental, Hanau, Germany).

Statistical analysis

Statistical differences were examined using Tukey's multiple comparison tests and simple linear regression analyses were done using Excel Statistics version 4.0 (Esumi Company, Tokyo, Japan). To compare the amount of CH4 emissions per unit of rice straw applied in this study with reported calculated values, t-tests for unpaired comparisons was done using KyPlot version 4.0 (KyensLab Incorporated, Tokyo, Japan).

RESULTS

In Mikasa, the average air temperature after harvest to before the first snowfall (October–November) was 8.8°C (range: 1.2–15.3°C) (). During the snowy period (late November–late April) the average air temperature was −1.1°C (range: −9.8 to 10.8°C) (). Snow depth averaged 67 cm (range: 0–131 cm). During the rice growing period (May–September), the total precipitation was 591 mm (), accounting for 49% of the annual total precipitation (CitationSapporo District Meteorological Observatory 2005). The mean air temperature during the rice growing period was 17.8°C (range: 8–27°C), which was 5.2°C lower than the average soil temperature at a depth of 3 cm.

Seasonal variations in CH4 emissions from the paddy fields are shown in . The incorporation of rice straw increased CH4 emissions during the rice growing season and emissions increased with increasing rice straw application. Within 1 week of transplantation, CH4 emissions from fields S4 and S5, which received higher amounts of rice straw, were 5.75 and 4.68 mg CH4-C m−2 h−1, respectively. These emissions were higher than those of 0.15 and 0.41 mg CH4-C m−2 h−1 in fields S2 and S3, respectively, which received lower amounts of rice straw. A late-season peak in CH4 emissions at the end of the reproductive stage was observed from all

Figure 1  Climate conditions of study area during winter-fallow and growing period.

Figure 1  Climate conditions of study area during winter-fallow and growing period.

Figure 2  Seasonal variation in CH4 emission rates from paddy fields in Mikasa during growing season.

Figure 2  Seasonal variation in CH4 emission rates from paddy fields in Mikasa during growing season.
fields receiving rice straw. When continuous flooding was interrupted by drainage for harvesting, the emissions from all fields also dropped quickly.

Total CH4 emissions in the fields containing rice straw ranged from 243% to 1000% of the field with no rice straw application (S1). The total CH4 emissions in S4 and S5, with higher amounts of rice straw, were 38.9 and 40.8 g CH4-C m−2, respectively, which were significantly (P < 0.01) greater than those in the other fields (). We compared the amount of CH4 emissions as per unit (dry matter) of rice straw applied in rice fields in the present study with previously reported values (). The average value of CH4 emissions in the present study was 2.4-fold higher than the reported average value (P < 0.05). We carried out regression analyses for rice straw C application (SCA) rate and CH4 emissions. Total CH4 emission was significantly correlated with organic C application rate (y = 0.486x − 1.644, r 2 = 0.884, P < 0.05) ().

DISCUSSION

CH4 emissions increased with increasing amounts of rice straw, and were 2–10-fold higher than in fields with no residual rice straw. Similar trends have also been observed in rice paddy fields in Italy (CitationSchütz et al. 1989), Texas, USA (CitationSass et al. 1990), Japan (CitationYagi and Minami 1990), the Philippines (CitationWassmann et al. 1996b) and Louisiana, USA (CitationKongchum et al. 2006). Moreover, CitationWang et al. (1992) found that incorporating rice straw (500–1,200 g dry matter m−2) into paddy fields increased CH4 emissions two–ninefold, showing a linear relationship with the amount of straw incorporated. In our study, a gradual increase of CH4 emissions resulting from the presence of rice straw (S4 and S5) was observed, with no early peaks. We found a fivefold increase in total CH4 emissions with the addition of one-fifth the amount of straw compared with those of CitationBossio et al. (1999) in California, USA, where rice straw

Table 3 Daily average (± standard deviation) fluxes and total seasonal (± standard deviation) CH4 emissions as affected by the addition of rice straw

Table 4 Comparison of CH4 emissions obtained per unit of rice straw application under continuous flooding conditions from paddy fields in Mikasa, central Hokkaido, Japan, with those reported from previous studies in various locations

was chopped and incorporated into the soil to a depth of 15 cm 6 months before the growing season. This difference might result from differences in straw decomposition rates during the winter fallow, methods of addition or variations in climate. CitationBossio et al. (1999) also suggested that autumn (October) incorporation and over-winter decomposition of the straw, despite low temperatures, is likely to be responsible for the lack of an early season peak in CH4 emissions during the growing season (May–September). The amount of CH4 emissions (g CH4-C m−2 g dry matter−1) as per unit (dry matter) of rice straw applied in this study were significantly (P < 0.05) higher than those of calculated reported values (). This is presumably because of the deep snow cover, low temperature and unplowed conditions, which may have retarded the decomposition of rice straw over the winter fallow. With rice straw applied during the off-season, CitationKondo and Yasuda (2003) found a lower rate of decomposition (26%) under cool temperate conditions. Retardation of straw decomposition rates at low temperatures and unplowed conditions have previously been reported (CitationKisselle et al. 2001; CitationSain and Broadbent 1997). The relationship between the amount of rice straw and seasonal total CH4 emissions under continuously flooded conditions reported in the present study is supported by many other researchers (CitationWang et al. 1992; CitationWatanabe et al. 1995; CitationYagi and Minami 1990). Our results suggest that the environmental conditions of central Hokkaido did not limit, but rather favored, CH4 emissions during the rice growing season because of the presence of rice straw.

Figure 3  Relationship between the amount of organic C applied and CH4 emission in paddy fields during growing season.

Figure 3  Relationship between the amount of organic C applied and CH4 emission in paddy fields during growing season.

Conclusions

Rice straw application had a significant influence on CH4 emissions in continuously flooded fields in central Hokkaido, Japan. There was a significant correlation between rice straw C application rate and total CH4 emission during the rice growing season. Our results suggest that the presence of rice straw has a significant influence on CH4 emissions from paddy fields in a snowy, temperate region. Comprehensive field studies are needed to establish CH4 mitigation strategies for paddy fields in this climate.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

his study was partly supported by the Global Environment Research Program of the Ministry of the Environment of Japan (No. S3–3a).

REFERENCES

  • Jacobson , MZ . 2005 . Atmospheric Pollution: History, Science and Regulation , New York : Cambridge University Press .
  • Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change . 2001 . Climate Change 2001The Scientific BasisContribution of Working Group I to the Third Assessment Report of the IPCC , Edited by: Houghton , JT , Ding , Y , Griggs , DJ , Noguer , M , Linden , PJ van der and Xiaosa , D . Cambridge : Cambridge University Press .
  • Naser , HM , Nagata , O and Hatano , R . 2005 . Greenhouse gas fluxes and global warming potentials in crop fields on soil-dressed peatland in Hokkaido, Japan . Phyton , 45 ( 4 ) : 285 – 293 .
  • Cao , M , Gregson , K and Marshall , S . 1998 . Global methane emission form wetlands and its sensitivity to climate change . AtmosEnviron , 32 : 3293 – 3299 .
  • Mosier , AR , Duxbury , JM , Freney , JR , Heinemeyer , O , Minami , K and Johnson , DE . 1998 . Mitigating agricultural emissions of methane . Climatic Change , 40 : 39 – 80 .
  • Neue , HU and Sass , RL . 1998 . The budget of methane from rice fields . IGACtivities Newsletter , 12 : 3 – 11 .
  • Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change . 1990 . Climate ChangeThe IPCC Scientific Assessment , Edited by: Houghton , JT , Jenkins , GJ and Ephraums , JJ . Cambridge : Cambridge University Press .
  • Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change . 1992 . Climate ChangeThe Supplementary Report to the IPCC Scientific Assessment , Edited by: Houghton , JT , Callender , BA and Varney , SK . Cambridge : Cambridge University Press .
  • Sass , RL and Fisher , FMJ . 1997 . Methane emissions from rice paddies: a process study summary . NutrCycling Agroecosyst , 49 : 119 – 127 .
  • Neue , HU . 1997 . Fluxes of methane from rice fields and potential for mitigation . Soil Use Manag , 13 : 258 – 267 .
  • Neue , HU , Becker , HP and Scharpenseel , HW . 1990 . “ Organic matter dynamics, soil properties, and cultural practices in rice lands and their relationship to methane production ” . In Soil and the Greenhouse Effect , Edited by: Bouwman , AF . 457 – 466 . New York : John Wiley .
  • Sass , RL , Fisher , FM , Wang , YB , Turner , FT and Jund , MF . 1992 . Methane emission from rice fields: The effect of floodwater management . Global BiogeochemCycles , 6 : 249 – 262 .
  • Wassmann , R , Neue , HU Lantin , RS . 2000b . Characterization of methane emissions from rice fields in Asia. II. Differences among irrigated, rainfed and deepwater rice . NutrCycling Agroecosyst , 58 : 13 – 22 .
  • Yagi , K , Tsuruta , H , Kanda , K and Minami , K . 1996 . Effect of water management on methane emission from a Japanese rice paddy field: Automated methane monitoring . Global BiogeochemCycles , 10 : 255 – 267 .
  • Bossio , DA , Horwath , WR , Mutters , RG and Kessel , VC . 1999 . Methane pool and flux dynamics in a rice field following straw incorporation . Soil BiolBiochem , 31 : 1313 – 1322 .
  • Cicerone , RJ , Delwiche , CC , Tyler , SC and Zimmerman , PR . 1992 . Methane emissions from California rice paddies with varied treatments . Global BiogeochemCycles , 6 : 233 – 248 .
  • Liou , RM , Huang , SN , Lin , WL and Chen , SH . 2003 . Methane emission from fields with three various rice straw treatments in Taiwan paddy soils . JEnvironSciHealth , B38 ( 4 ) : 511 – 527 .
  • Sass , RL , Fisher , FM , Harcombe , PS and Turner , FT . 1991 . Mitigation of methane emissions from rice fields: possible adverse effects of incorporated rice straw . Global BiogeochemCycles , 5 : 275 – 287 .
  • Yagi , K , Tsuruta , H , Kanda , K and Minami , K . 1991 . Manual of CH4and N2O flux measuring . Collected Papers on Environ. Plann. , 7 : 143 – 158 . (in Japanese)
  • Wassmann , R , Shangguan , XT Tolg , M . 1996a . Spatial and seasonal distribution of organic amendments affecting methane emission from Chinese rice fields . BiolFertilSoils , 22 : 191 – 195 .
  • Yagi , K and Minami , K . 1990 . Effect of organic matter application on methane emission from some Japanese rice fields . Soil SciPlant Nutr , 36 ( 4 ) : 599 – 610 .
  • Denier van der Gon , HAC and Neue , HU . 1995 . Influence of organic matter incorporation on the methane emission from a wetland rice field . Global BiogeochemCycles , 9 : 11 – 22 .
  • Watanabe , A , Satoh , Y and Kimura , M . 1995 . Estimation of the increase in CH4emission from paddy soils by rice straw application . Plant Soil , 173 : 225 – 231 .
  • Sapporo District Meteorological Observatory2005Digital reading room – Daily and annual climate data at Iwamizawa Weather Station. http://www.data.kishou.go.jp (http://www.data.kishou.go.jp)
  • Schütz , H , Holzapfel-Pschorn , A , Conrad , R , Rennenberg , H and Seiler , W . 1989 . A 3-year continuous record on the influence of daytime, season and fertilizer treatment on methane emission rates from an Italian rice paddy . JGeophysResAtmos , 94 : 16 405 – 16 416 .
  • Sass , RL , Fisher , FM , Harcombe , PA and Turner , FT . 1990 . Methane production and emission in a Texas rice field . Global BiogeochemCycles , 4 : 47 – 68 .
  • Wassmann , R , Neue , HU Alberto , MCR . 1996b . Fluxes, and pools of methane in wetland rice soils with varying organic inputs . EnvironMonitAssess , 42 : 163 – 173 .
  • Kongchum , M , Bollich , PK , Hunnall , WH , DeLaune , RD and Lindau , CW . 2006 . Decreasing methane emission of rice by better crop management . AgronSustainDev , 26 : 1 – 10 .
  • Wang , ZP , Delaune , RD , Lindau , CW and Patrick , WH . 1992 . Methane production from anaerobic soil amended with rice straw and nitrogen fertilizers . FertRes , 33 : 115 – 121 .
  • Kondo , M and Yasuda , M . 2003 . Seasonal changes in N2fixation activity and N enrichment in paddy soils as affected by soil management in the northern area of Japan . JARQ , 37 ( 2 ) : 105 – 111 .
  • Kisselle , KW , Garrett , CJ Fu , S . 2001 . Budgets for root-derived C and litter-derived C: comparison between conventional tillage and no tillage soils . Soil BiolBiochem , 33 : 1067 – 1075 .
  • Sain , P and Broadbent , FE . 1997 . Decomposition of rice straw in soils as affected by some management factors . JEnvironQual , 6 : 96 – 100 .
  • Corton , TM , Bajita , JB Grospe , FS . 2000 . Methane emission from irrigated and intensively managed rice fields in Central Luzon (Philippines) . NutrCycling Agroecosyst , 58 : 37 – 53 .
  • Goto , E , Miyamori , Y , Hasegawa , S and Inatsu , O . 2004 . Reduction effects of accelerating rice straw decomposition and water management on methane emission from paddy fields in a cold district . JpnJSoil SciPlant Nutr , 75 : 191 – 201 .
  • Jermsawatdipong , P , Murase , J Prabuddham , P . 1994 . Methane emission from plots with differences in fertilizer application in Thai paddy fields . Soil SciPlant Nutr , 40 : 63 – 71 .
  • Kumagai , K and Konno , Y . 1998 . Methane emission form rice paddy fields after upland farming . JpnJSoil SciPlant Nutr , 69 : 333 – 339 . (in Japanese)
  • Lee , KB , Lee , DB , Kim , JG and Kim , YW . 1997 . Effect of rice cultural patterns on methane emission from a Korean paddy soil . JKorean SocSoil SciFertil , 30 : 35 – 40 . (in Korean)
  • Singh , JS , Singh , S , Raghubanshi , AS , Singh , S and Kashyap , AK . 1996 . Methane flux from rice/wheat agroecosystem as affected by crop phenology, fertilization and water level . Plant Soil , 183 : 323 – 327 .

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.