Yet Another Turn? The Evolutionary Project in Economic Geography

Abstract

What does the economic in economic geography stand for? For much of the 1990s up to the more recent past, answers to this pertinent question frequently referred to the embeddedness-network paradigm of the new economic sociology. At the same time, economic geography more and more drew inspiration, metaphors, and practices from an increasingly diverse range of schools. In terms of the disciplinary orientation, economic geography, on the one hand, remains firmly engaged with sociology, although interest seems to expand from the Granovetterian paradigm to the poststructuralism of Latour and Callon. On the other hand, economic geography’s interest in heterodox economic geography is gaining new momentum. Above all, evolutionary approaches have attracted considerable attention that most recently culminated in a range of programmatic statements to develop a distinct evolutionary economic geography. It is these attempts to develop a collective agenda that Danny MacKinnon, Andrew Cumbers, Andy Pike, Kean Birch, and Robert McMaster take issue with. Subsequently, Ron Boschma and Koen Frenken, Jürgen Essletzbichler, and Geoffrey Hodgson comment on this “sympathetic critique.” A rejoinder by Andy Pike and his coauthors concludes this symposium.

Key Words:

• evolutionary economic geography
• institutional economic geography
• political economic geography
• Generalized Darwinism
• Nelson and Winter

Acknowledgments

I thank the authors and the commentators for their constructive contributions to this debate on the directions of the evolutionary project in economic geography. I am also grateful to Yuko Aoyama for her helpful comments and Joanne Miller for her patience and, as always, excellent editorial support.