32
Views
82
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Transcriptional Regulation

PU.1 and pRB Interact and Cooperate To Repress GATA-1 and Block Erythroid Differentiation

, , , , &
Pages 7460-7474 | Received 02 Apr 2003, Accepted 25 Jul 2003, Published online: 27 Mar 2023
 

Abstract

PU.1 and GATA-1 are two hematopoietic specific transcription factors that play key roles in development of the myeloid and erythroid lineages, respectively. The two proteins bind to one another and inhibit each other's function in transcriptional activation and promotion of their respective differentiation programs. This mutual antagonism may be an important aspect of lineage commitment decisions. PU.1 can also act as an oncoprotein since deregulated expression of PU.1 in erythroid precursors causes erythroleukemias in mice. Studies of cultured mouse erythroleukemia cell lines indicate that one aspect of PU.1 function in erythroleukemogenesis is its ability to block erythroid differentiation by repressing GATA-1 (N. Rekhtman, F. Radparvar, T. Evans, and A. I. Skoultchi, Genes Dev. 13:1398-1411, 1999). We have investigated the mechanism of PU.1-mediated repression of GATA-1. We report here that PU.1 binds to GATA-1 on DNA. We localized the repression activity of PU.1 to a small acidic N-terminal domain that interacts with the C pocket of pRB, a well-known transcriptional corepressor. Repression of GATA-1 by PU.1 requires pRB, and pRB colocalizes with PU.1 and GATA-1 at repressed GATA-1 target genes. PU.1 and pRB also cooperate to block erythroid differentiation. Our results suggest that one of the mechanisms by which PU.1 antagonizes GATA-1 is by binding to it at GATA-1 target genes and tethering to these sites a corepressor that blocks transcriptional activity and thereby erythroid differentiation.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We are extremely grateful to Tianyuan Zhou and Cheng-Ming Chiang for carrying out the EMSA and footprinting experiments with PU.1 and GATA-1. We also thank Todd Evans, Richard Pestell, Leila Alland, and Liang Zhu for providing critical reagents and advice.

A.I.S. received support from National Cancer Institute Cancer Center grant 2P30CA13330. N.R., I.M., and K.C. were supported by NIH/MSTP 5T32GM07288-25. This work was supported by NIH grant 5R37CA16368.

I.M., S.M., and T.S. contributed equally to this study.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 61.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 265.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.