Publication Cover
Studies in Psychology
Estudios de Psicología
Volume 28, 2007 - Issue 3
148
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Discapacidad visible y no visible: diferencias en el autoconcepto

Visible and non visible Disability: Differences in self-concept

, &
Pages 359-368 | Published online: 23 Jan 2014
 

Resumen

El presente estudio analizó posibles diferencias en el autoconcepto de 77 personas adultas con discapacidad física visible y discapacidad no visible, afectadas de retinosis pigmentaria. Se utilizó la escala de autoconcepto Tennessee (Fitts, 1965). Un primer análisis multivariante (MANOVA) mostró diferencias en el autoconcepto en función de la visibilidad de la discapacidad. Las personas con discapacidad visible presentaban un nivel de autoconcepto físico y moral-ético más bajo, en cambio, tenían más alto el autoconcepto familiar. Un segundo MANOVA pretendía conocer qué papel desempeñaban el género, la edad o el nivel de estudios. No se hallaron diferencias en estos aspectos, pues aunque había diferencias en función del género considerando el grupo en su conjunto, no las había en función de la visibilidad de la discapacidad. Los resultados recomiendan que las personas con discapacidad visible participen en programas de apoyo psicológico para favorecer su bienestar personal y social.

Abstract

Possible differences in the self-concept of 77 adults with either visible physical disabilities (21 men and 23 women) or non visible disabilities affected by retinitis pigmentosa (14 men and 19 women) were analysed in the study. The Tennessee Self-Concept Scale (Fitts, 1965) which evaluates five factors involved in self-concept was applied. Initial multivariate analysis (MANOVA) results showed that differences in self-concept were a function of the visibility of the disability. The group with visible disabilities had lower physical and moral-ethical self-concept, though their family self-concept was higher. A second MANOVA was performed to analyse the role of gender, age and level of education. However, no differences in these aspects were found, for although there were gender differences for the group as a whole, there were none related to visibility of disability. Finally, it is recommended that people with visible disabilities participate in psychological support programmes that favour their personal and social well-being.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.